不等概率样本有限总体分位数的贝叶斯推理。

IF 1.2 4区 数学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS Survey Methodology Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-12-19
Qixuan Chen, Michael R Elliott, Roderick J A Little
{"title":"不等概率样本有限总体分位数的贝叶斯推理。","authors":"Qixuan Chen,&nbsp;Michael R Elliott,&nbsp;Roderick J A Little","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper develops two Bayesian methods for inference about finite population quantiles of continuous survey variables from unequal probability sampling. The first method estimates cumulative distribution functions of the continuous survey variable by fitting a number of probit penalized spline regression models on the inclusion probabilities. The finite population quantiles are then obtained by inverting the estimated distribution function. This method is quite computationally demanding. The second method predicts non-sampled values by assuming a smoothly-varying relationship between the continuous survey variable and the probability of inclusion, by modeling both the mean function and the variance function using splines. The two Bayesian spline-model-based estimators yield a desirable balance between robustness and efficiency. Simulation studies show that both methods yield smaller root mean squared errors than the sample-weighted estimator and the ratio and difference estimators described by Rao, Kovar, and Mantel (RKM 1990), and are more robust to model misspecification than the regression through the origin model-based estimator described in Chambers and Dunstan (1986). When the sample size is small, the 95% credible intervals of the two new methods have closer to nominal confidence coverage than the sample-weighted estimator.</p>","PeriodicalId":51191,"journal":{"name":"Survey Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708554/pdf/nihms921237.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bayesian inference for finite population quantiles from unequal probability samples.\",\"authors\":\"Qixuan Chen,&nbsp;Michael R Elliott,&nbsp;Roderick J A Little\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper develops two Bayesian methods for inference about finite population quantiles of continuous survey variables from unequal probability sampling. The first method estimates cumulative distribution functions of the continuous survey variable by fitting a number of probit penalized spline regression models on the inclusion probabilities. The finite population quantiles are then obtained by inverting the estimated distribution function. This method is quite computationally demanding. The second method predicts non-sampled values by assuming a smoothly-varying relationship between the continuous survey variable and the probability of inclusion, by modeling both the mean function and the variance function using splines. The two Bayesian spline-model-based estimators yield a desirable balance between robustness and efficiency. Simulation studies show that both methods yield smaller root mean squared errors than the sample-weighted estimator and the ratio and difference estimators described by Rao, Kovar, and Mantel (RKM 1990), and are more robust to model misspecification than the regression through the origin model-based estimator described in Chambers and Dunstan (1986). When the sample size is small, the 95% credible intervals of the two new methods have closer to nominal confidence coverage than the sample-weighted estimator.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey Methodology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708554/pdf/nihms921237.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文发展了两种用不等概率抽样对连续调查变量有限总体分位数进行推断的贝叶斯方法。第一种方法通过对包含概率拟合多个概率惩罚样条回归模型来估计连续调查变量的累积分布函数。然后通过对估计的分布函数进行反求得到有限总体分位数。这种方法对计算量要求很高。第二种方法通过假设连续调查变量与包含概率之间的平滑变化关系,通过使用样条对均值函数和方差函数建模来预测非抽样值。这两个基于贝叶斯样条模型的估计器在鲁棒性和效率之间取得了理想的平衡。仿真研究表明,这两种方法产生的均方根误差都小于样本加权估计器和Rao、Kovar和Mantel (RKM 1990)描述的比率和差异估计器,并且比Chambers和Dunstan(1986)描述的基于起源模型的估计器的回归对模型错误规范的鲁棒性更强。当样本量较小时,两种新方法的95%可信区间比样本加权估计器更接近名义置信覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bayesian inference for finite population quantiles from unequal probability samples.

This paper develops two Bayesian methods for inference about finite population quantiles of continuous survey variables from unequal probability sampling. The first method estimates cumulative distribution functions of the continuous survey variable by fitting a number of probit penalized spline regression models on the inclusion probabilities. The finite population quantiles are then obtained by inverting the estimated distribution function. This method is quite computationally demanding. The second method predicts non-sampled values by assuming a smoothly-varying relationship between the continuous survey variable and the probability of inclusion, by modeling both the mean function and the variance function using splines. The two Bayesian spline-model-based estimators yield a desirable balance between robustness and efficiency. Simulation studies show that both methods yield smaller root mean squared errors than the sample-weighted estimator and the ratio and difference estimators described by Rao, Kovar, and Mantel (RKM 1990), and are more robust to model misspecification than the regression through the origin model-based estimator described in Chambers and Dunstan (1986). When the sample size is small, the 95% credible intervals of the two new methods have closer to nominal confidence coverage than the sample-weighted estimator.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Survey Methodology
Survey Methodology 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles dealing with various aspects of statistical development relevant to a statistical agency, such as design issues in the context of practical constraints, use of different data sources and collection techniques, total survey error, survey evaluation, research in survey methodology, time series analysis, seasonal adjustment, demographic studies, data integration, estimation and data analysis methods, and general survey systems development. The emphasis is placed on the development and evaluation of specific methodologies as applied to data collection or the data themselves.
期刊最新文献
The anchoring method: Estimation of interviewer effects in the absence of interpenetrated sample assignment. A note on multiply robust predictive mean matching imputation with complex survey data. Optimum allocation for a dual-frame telephone survey. Combining information from multiple complex surveys. A nonparametric method to generate synthetic populations to adjust for complex sampling design features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1