抑制磷酸二酯酶-5治疗慢性心力衰竭的益处:一项荟萃分析。

Renato De Vecchis, Arturo Cesaro, Carmelina Ariano
{"title":"抑制磷酸二酯酶-5治疗慢性心力衰竭的益处:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Renato De Vecchis,&nbsp;Arturo Cesaro,&nbsp;Carmelina Ariano","doi":"10.1556/1646.9.2017.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) have been shown to be beneficial for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, several studies would have documented a useful effect of PDE5i even for pulmonary hypertension secondary to left-sided chronic heart failure (CHF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which had compared PDE5i (mostly sildenafil) and placebo in CHF patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies enrolling a total of 928 patients were incorporated in the meta-analysis. In heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFREF), PDE5i, compared to placebo, significantly improved the composite of death and hospitalization (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.74). They also improved peak VO<sub>2</sub> [difference in means (MD): 3.76; 95% CI: 3.27-4.25], six-minute walking distance test (MD: 22.7 m; 95% CI: 8.19-37.21), and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (MD: -11.52 mmHg; 95% CI: -15.56 to -7.49). Conversely, in CHF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF), PDE5i proved not to yield any significant improvement of the investigated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In HFREF, PDE5i showed beneficial effects on the composite of death and hospitalization, as well as on exercise capacity and pulmonary hemodynamics. Conversely, in HFpEF, no significant clinical, spiroergometric, or hemodynamic improvement was achieved using PDE5i therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":45181,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1646.9.2017.26","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic benefits of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition in chronic heart failure: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Renato De Vecchis,&nbsp;Arturo Cesaro,&nbsp;Carmelina Ariano\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/1646.9.2017.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) have been shown to be beneficial for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, several studies would have documented a useful effect of PDE5i even for pulmonary hypertension secondary to left-sided chronic heart failure (CHF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which had compared PDE5i (mostly sildenafil) and placebo in CHF patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies enrolling a total of 928 patients were incorporated in the meta-analysis. In heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFREF), PDE5i, compared to placebo, significantly improved the composite of death and hospitalization (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.74). They also improved peak VO<sub>2</sub> [difference in means (MD): 3.76; 95% CI: 3.27-4.25], six-minute walking distance test (MD: 22.7 m; 95% CI: 8.19-37.21), and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (MD: -11.52 mmHg; 95% CI: -15.56 to -7.49). Conversely, in CHF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF), PDE5i proved not to yield any significant improvement of the investigated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In HFREF, PDE5i showed beneficial effects on the composite of death and hospitalization, as well as on exercise capacity and pulmonary hemodynamics. Conversely, in HFpEF, no significant clinical, spiroergometric, or hemodynamic improvement was achieved using PDE5i therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1646.9.2017.26\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.9.2017.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.9.2017.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂(PDE5i)已被证明对肺动脉高压患者有益。然而,一些研究已经证明PDE5i甚至对继发于左侧慢性心力衰竭(CHF)的肺动脉高压也有有益的作用。方法:我们进行了一项荟萃分析,包括随机对照试验(rct),比较了PDE5i(主要是西地那非)和安慰剂在CHF患者中的作用。结果:14项研究共纳入928例患者纳入meta分析。在左心室射血分数(HFREF)降低的心力衰竭中,与安慰剂相比,PDE5i显著改善了死亡和住院的综合情况(OR = 0.28;95% ci: 0.10-0.74)。它们还提高了峰值VO2[平均差值(MD): 3.76;95% CI: 3.27-4.25], 6分钟步行距离测试(MD: 22.7 m;95% CI: 8.19-37.21),肺动脉收缩压(MD: -11.52 mmHg;95% CI: -15.56 ~ -7.49)。相反,在保留左室射血分数(HFpEF)的CHF患者中,PDE5i被证明对研究结果没有任何显著改善。结论:在HFREF中,PDE5i对死亡和住院的综合、运动能力和肺血流动力学都有有益的影响。相反,在HFpEF中,使用PDE5i治疗没有显著的临床、肺活量测量或血流动力学改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic benefits of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition in chronic heart failure: A meta-analysis.

Background: Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) have been shown to be beneficial for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, several studies would have documented a useful effect of PDE5i even for pulmonary hypertension secondary to left-sided chronic heart failure (CHF).

Methods: We performed a meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which had compared PDE5i (mostly sildenafil) and placebo in CHF patients.

Results: Fourteen studies enrolling a total of 928 patients were incorporated in the meta-analysis. In heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFREF), PDE5i, compared to placebo, significantly improved the composite of death and hospitalization (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.74). They also improved peak VO2 [difference in means (MD): 3.76; 95% CI: 3.27-4.25], six-minute walking distance test (MD: 22.7 m; 95% CI: 8.19-37.21), and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (MD: -11.52 mmHg; 95% CI: -15.56 to -7.49). Conversely, in CHF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF), PDE5i proved not to yield any significant improvement of the investigated outcomes.

Conclusions: In HFREF, PDE5i showed beneficial effects on the composite of death and hospitalization, as well as on exercise capacity and pulmonary hemodynamics. Conversely, in HFpEF, no significant clinical, spiroergometric, or hemodynamic improvement was achieved using PDE5i therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Plasma interleukin-6 levels correlate with survival in patients with bacterial sepsis and septic shock. Levels of glucagon-like peptide 1 in hyperemesis gravidarum. ln vitro inhibition of beta-hematin formation and in vivo effects of Diospyros mespiliformis and Mondia whitei methanol extracts on chloroquine-susceptible Plasmodium berghei-induced malaria in mice. Pulsation of catheter during coronary angiography: Is it a sign of severe aortic regurgitation? Efficacy, safety and tolerability of bosentan as an adjuvant to sildenafil and sildenafil alone in persistant pulmonary hypertension of newborn (PPHN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1