锥形束计算机断层扫描与超低剂量方案的植入前放射学评估:一项体外研究。

Q1 Dentistry European Journal of Oral Implantology Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Robert Liljeholm, Nils Kadesjö, Daniel Benchimol, Kristina Hellén-Halme, Xie-Qi Shi
{"title":"锥形束计算机断层扫描与超低剂量方案的植入前放射学评估:一项体外研究。","authors":"Robert Liljeholm,&nbsp;Nils Kadesjö,&nbsp;Daniel Benchimol,&nbsp;Kristina Hellén-Halme,&nbsp;Xie-Qi Shi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the ultra-low dose scanning protocols of a newly developed CBCT for pre-implant radiographic assessment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total number of 32 CBCT scans were exposed at 90 kV using ProMax 3D's standard (GS) and three ultra-low dose scanning protocols: high, mid and low definition (UL-HD, UL-MD and UL-LD) on eight human dry skulls with simulated soft tissue. The mAs values and the voxel size were 96mAs/200 µm, 28mAs/150 µm, 22.4mAs/200 µm and 7.5mAs/400 µm for scanning protocols GS, UL-HD, UL-MD and UL-LD, respectively. The overall image quality and the precision of anatomical landmarks were assessed on a 4-rank ordinal scale by seven observers. Logistic regression analysis and post-hoc Scheffé test were applied to analyse possible differences in image quality and recognition of the anatomical structures for the three ultra-low dose protocols, compared with the standard protocol. Additionally, observers performed bone quality assessment and bone quantity measurement at 96 predefined 2D cross-sectional images. A Pearson Chi-square test and a paired t-test were used to analyse assessed bone quality and quantity using the four scanning protocols respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the CBCT unit, ProMax 3D, UL-LD was not diagnostically acceptable for pre-implant assessment, whereas the UL-HD and UL-MD were diagnostically acceptable regarding overall image quality, visibility of most anatomical structures and bone quality assessment. However, to recognise the border of mandibular canal and the border of maxillary sinus, standard protocol may be indicated for some cases. No statistically significant differences in bone height measurement were found when applying standard protocol and the three ultra-low dose protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose scanning protocols may be applied for pre-implant radiographic assessment, although image quality can be hampered if the radiation exposure is too low and the voxel size too large.</p>","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"10 3","pages":"351-359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cone-beam computed tomography with ultra-low dose protocols for pre-implant radiographic assessment: An in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Liljeholm,&nbsp;Nils Kadesjö,&nbsp;Daniel Benchimol,&nbsp;Kristina Hellén-Halme,&nbsp;Xie-Qi Shi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the ultra-low dose scanning protocols of a newly developed CBCT for pre-implant radiographic assessment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total number of 32 CBCT scans were exposed at 90 kV using ProMax 3D's standard (GS) and three ultra-low dose scanning protocols: high, mid and low definition (UL-HD, UL-MD and UL-LD) on eight human dry skulls with simulated soft tissue. The mAs values and the voxel size were 96mAs/200 µm, 28mAs/150 µm, 22.4mAs/200 µm and 7.5mAs/400 µm for scanning protocols GS, UL-HD, UL-MD and UL-LD, respectively. The overall image quality and the precision of anatomical landmarks were assessed on a 4-rank ordinal scale by seven observers. Logistic regression analysis and post-hoc Scheffé test were applied to analyse possible differences in image quality and recognition of the anatomical structures for the three ultra-low dose protocols, compared with the standard protocol. Additionally, observers performed bone quality assessment and bone quantity measurement at 96 predefined 2D cross-sectional images. A Pearson Chi-square test and a paired t-test were used to analyse assessed bone quality and quantity using the four scanning protocols respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the CBCT unit, ProMax 3D, UL-LD was not diagnostically acceptable for pre-implant assessment, whereas the UL-HD and UL-MD were diagnostically acceptable regarding overall image quality, visibility of most anatomical structures and bone quality assessment. However, to recognise the border of mandibular canal and the border of maxillary sinus, standard protocol may be indicated for some cases. No statistically significant differences in bone height measurement were found when applying standard protocol and the three ultra-low dose protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose scanning protocols may be applied for pre-implant radiographic assessment, although image quality can be hampered if the radiation exposure is too low and the voxel size too large.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oral Implantology\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"351-359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oral Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价一种新型CBCT的超低剂量扫描方案在种植前放射学评估中的应用。材料和方法:采用ProMax 3D标准(GS)和3种超低剂量扫描方案(高、中、低清(UL-HD、UL-MD和UL-LD),在90 kV下对8个具有模拟软组织的人体干颅骨进行32次CBCT扫描。扫描协议GS、UL-HD、UL-MD和UL-LD的mAs值和体素大小分别为96mAs/200µm、28mAs/150µm、22.4mAs/200µm和7.5mAs/400µm。整体图像质量和解剖标志的精度由7名观察员在4级有序尺度上进行评估。采用Logistic回归分析和事后scheff检验分析三种超低剂量方案与标准方案相比在图像质量和解剖结构识别方面可能存在的差异。此外,观察人员在96张预定义的2D横截面图像上进行骨质量评估和骨量测量。使用Pearson卡方检验和配对t检验分别分析使用四种扫描方案评估的骨质量和骨数量。结果:对于CBCT单元,ProMax 3D、UL-LD在植入前评估方面不能被诊断为可接受的,而UL-HD和UL-MD在整体图像质量、大多数解剖结构的可见性和骨质量评估方面可被诊断为可接受的。然而,为了识别下颌骨管的边界和上颌窦的边界,在某些情况下可能需要标准的方案。应用标准方案和三种超低剂量方案时,骨高度测量结果无统计学差异。结论:低剂量扫描方案可用于植入前放射学评估,但如果辐射暴露过低且体素大小过大,则会影响图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cone-beam computed tomography with ultra-low dose protocols for pre-implant radiographic assessment: An in vitro study.

Purpose: To evaluate the ultra-low dose scanning protocols of a newly developed CBCT for pre-implant radiographic assessment.

Materials and methods: A total number of 32 CBCT scans were exposed at 90 kV using ProMax 3D's standard (GS) and three ultra-low dose scanning protocols: high, mid and low definition (UL-HD, UL-MD and UL-LD) on eight human dry skulls with simulated soft tissue. The mAs values and the voxel size were 96mAs/200 µm, 28mAs/150 µm, 22.4mAs/200 µm and 7.5mAs/400 µm for scanning protocols GS, UL-HD, UL-MD and UL-LD, respectively. The overall image quality and the precision of anatomical landmarks were assessed on a 4-rank ordinal scale by seven observers. Logistic regression analysis and post-hoc Scheffé test were applied to analyse possible differences in image quality and recognition of the anatomical structures for the three ultra-low dose protocols, compared with the standard protocol. Additionally, observers performed bone quality assessment and bone quantity measurement at 96 predefined 2D cross-sectional images. A Pearson Chi-square test and a paired t-test were used to analyse assessed bone quality and quantity using the four scanning protocols respectively.

Results: For the CBCT unit, ProMax 3D, UL-LD was not diagnostically acceptable for pre-implant assessment, whereas the UL-HD and UL-MD were diagnostically acceptable regarding overall image quality, visibility of most anatomical structures and bone quality assessment. However, to recognise the border of mandibular canal and the border of maxillary sinus, standard protocol may be indicated for some cases. No statistically significant differences in bone height measurement were found when applying standard protocol and the three ultra-low dose protocols.

Conclusions: Low-dose scanning protocols may be applied for pre-implant radiographic assessment, although image quality can be hampered if the radiation exposure is too low and the voxel size too large.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Implantology
European Journal of Oral Implantology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.35
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Immediate loading of fixed prostheses in fully edentulous jaws - 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study. Research in focus. Dental implants with internal versus external connections: 1-year post-loading results from a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial. Research in focus. Immediate, early (6 weeks) and delayed loading (3 months) of single, partial and full fixed implant supported prostheses: 1-year post-loading data from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1