模拟益生菌在单菌种产品和多菌种产品中的结肠存活。

Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease Pub Date : 2017-10-17 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1080/16512235.2017.1378061
S D Forssten, A C Ouwehand
{"title":"模拟益生菌在单菌种产品和多菌种产品中的结肠存活。","authors":"S D Forssten,&nbsp;A C Ouwehand","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2017.1378061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Probiotic formulations can be single- or multi-strain. Commercially, multi-strain preparations have been suggested to have improved functionality over single-strain cultures. Probiotics are often tested as single-strain preparations but may subsequently be commercially formulated as multi-strain products. <b>Objective</b>: The aim of this study was to determine what happens at the site of action, the intestine, with probiotics as single- compared to multi-strain preparations. The human gastrointestinal tract contains a broad mixture of different microbes which may affect the survival of different probiotics in different ways. <b>Design</b>: The current study was performed to evaluate, in an <i>in vitro</i> colon simulation, whether probiotics influence each other's survival when they are taken as a combination of several strains (HOWARU Restore; <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> NCFM, <i>Lactobacillus paracasei</i> Lpc-37, <i>Bifidobacterium lactis</i> Bl-04 and <i>B. lactis</i> Bi-07) compared to the strains as single preparations. <b>Results</b>: All strains could be detected after the colon simulations and there were no substantial differences in levels of the same strain when comparing single- and multi-strain products. <b>Conclusions</b>: It can be concluded that probiotics do not have an antagonistic effect on each other's survival when used in a multi-strain product compared to a single-strain product, at least within a microbiota in a simulated colonic environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":"1378061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16512235.2017.1378061","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulating colonic survival of probiotics in single-strain products compared to multi-strain products.\",\"authors\":\"S D Forssten,&nbsp;A C Ouwehand\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16512235.2017.1378061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Probiotic formulations can be single- or multi-strain. Commercially, multi-strain preparations have been suggested to have improved functionality over single-strain cultures. Probiotics are often tested as single-strain preparations but may subsequently be commercially formulated as multi-strain products. <b>Objective</b>: The aim of this study was to determine what happens at the site of action, the intestine, with probiotics as single- compared to multi-strain preparations. The human gastrointestinal tract contains a broad mixture of different microbes which may affect the survival of different probiotics in different ways. <b>Design</b>: The current study was performed to evaluate, in an <i>in vitro</i> colon simulation, whether probiotics influence each other's survival when they are taken as a combination of several strains (HOWARU Restore; <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> NCFM, <i>Lactobacillus paracasei</i> Lpc-37, <i>Bifidobacterium lactis</i> Bl-04 and <i>B. lactis</i> Bi-07) compared to the strains as single preparations. <b>Results</b>: All strains could be detected after the colon simulations and there were no substantial differences in levels of the same strain when comparing single- and multi-strain products. <b>Conclusions</b>: It can be concluded that probiotics do not have an antagonistic effect on each other's survival when used in a multi-strain product compared to a single-strain product, at least within a microbiota in a simulated colonic environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"1378061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16512235.2017.1378061\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2017.1378061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2017.1378061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

背景:益生菌制剂可以是单菌株或多菌株。商业上,多菌种制剂已被认为比单菌种培养具有更好的功能。益生菌通常作为单菌株制剂进行测试,但随后可能作为多菌株产品进行商业配制。目的:本研究的目的是确定与多菌株制剂相比,单一益生菌制剂在肠道作用部位发生了什么。人体胃肠道中含有多种不同的微生物,这些微生物可能以不同的方式影响不同益生菌的生存。设计:本研究旨在通过体外结肠模拟来评估益生菌作为几种菌株的组合是否会影响彼此的生存(HOWARU Restore;嗜酸乳杆菌NCFM、副干酪乳杆菌Lpc-37、乳酸双歧杆菌Bl-04和乳酸双歧杆菌Bi-07)作为单一制剂进行比较。结果:结肠模拟后所有菌株均可检出,单菌株与多菌株产品比较,同一菌株水平无显著差异。结论:可以得出结论,与单菌株产品相比,益生菌在多菌株产品中使用时不会对彼此的生存产生拮抗作用,至少在模拟结肠环境中的微生物群中是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simulating colonic survival of probiotics in single-strain products compared to multi-strain products.

Background: Probiotic formulations can be single- or multi-strain. Commercially, multi-strain preparations have been suggested to have improved functionality over single-strain cultures. Probiotics are often tested as single-strain preparations but may subsequently be commercially formulated as multi-strain products. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine what happens at the site of action, the intestine, with probiotics as single- compared to multi-strain preparations. The human gastrointestinal tract contains a broad mixture of different microbes which may affect the survival of different probiotics in different ways. Design: The current study was performed to evaluate, in an in vitro colon simulation, whether probiotics influence each other's survival when they are taken as a combination of several strains (HOWARU Restore; Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM, Lactobacillus paracasei Lpc-37, Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04 and B. lactis Bi-07) compared to the strains as single preparations. Results: All strains could be detected after the colon simulations and there were no substantial differences in levels of the same strain when comparing single- and multi-strain products. Conclusions: It can be concluded that probiotics do not have an antagonistic effect on each other's survival when used in a multi-strain product compared to a single-strain product, at least within a microbiota in a simulated colonic environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
'Neurasthenia gastrica' revisited: perceptions of nerve-gut interactions in nervous exhaustion, 1880-1920. Mind the Gut-displaying microbiome research through artistic collaboration. Antimicrobial resistance due to the content of potentially toxic metals in soil and fertilizing products. Selection of fast and slow growing bacteria from fecal microbiota using continuous culture with changing dilution rate. Gut thinking: the gut microbiome and mental health beyond the head.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1