首页 > 最新文献

Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease最新文献

英文 中文
Mind the Gut-displaying microbiome research through artistic collaboration. 注意通过艺术合作进行的肠道微生物组研究。
Pub Date : 2018-12-25 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/16512235.2018.1555433
Adam Bencard, Louise Emma Whiteley

This paper presents the Mind the Gut exhibition, opened in 2017 at the Medical Museion, the University of Copenhagen's museum for the culture and history of medicine. It is an experimental exhibition combining science, art, and history in an examination of the relationship between mind and gut, including the trillions of microbes that inhabits them. Mind the Gut was the result of a 2-year-long research and curatorial process, which began in 2015 when Museion was awarded the Bikuben Foundation Vision Award. The exhibition brings together the long history of attempts to understand and intervene in the relationship between mind and gut, between emotions and digestion with cutting-edge biomedical research, and includes the perspectives of science, medicine, and personal experience, via a combination of artworks, historical objects from the Medical Museion collections, items from laboratories, and individual stories. The exhibition is organized around different ways the body has been handled in order to intervene in interactions between mind, gut, and bacteria, including imaging, electrifying, feeding, drugging, and opening surgically. This paper outlines some of the thoughts on science communication that motivated the exhibition, discussing why the displays emphasize the exploratory over the explanatory. Also discussed are several artistic collaborations that formed part of the displays. Ultimately, Mind the Gut is created to be a public space that encourages reflection and curiosity, by showing how biomedicine fits into social, cultural, historical, and directly personal contexts. The exhibition does not aim to provide answers about what food the visitors should eat or what the truth of how gut and brain interactions might be. Rather, it emphasizes process over result, hopefully encouraging the visitors to ask their own questions of the relationship between mind and gut, between body and microbes.

本文介绍了Mind the Gut展览,该展览于2017年在哥本哈根大学医学博物馆医学博物馆开幕,该博物馆是医学文化和历史博物馆。这是一场结合科学、艺术和历史的实验性展览,旨在研究心灵与肠道之间的关系,包括栖息在肠道中的数万亿微生物。Mind the Gut是一个为期两年的研究和策展过程的结果,该过程始于2015年,当时Museion被授予Bikuben基金会愿景奖。本次展览通过艺术作品、医学博物馆收藏的历史物品、实验室物品和个人故事的组合,汇集了长期以来试图理解和干预心灵与肠道、情感与消化之间的关系的生物医学研究,包括科学、医学和个人经验的视角。展览围绕不同的身体处理方式来组织,以干预思想,肠道和细菌之间的相互作用,包括成像,通电,喂食,药物和手术打开。本文概述了推动展览的一些科学传播思想,讨论了为什么展览强调探索性而不是解释性。还讨论了构成展览一部分的几个艺术合作。最终,Mind the Gut被创造成一个鼓励反思和好奇心的公共空间,通过展示生物医学如何适应社会、文化、历史和直接的个人背景。展览的目的并不是提供参观者应该吃什么食物的答案,或者肠道和大脑相互作用的真相是什么。相反,它强调过程而不是结果,希望鼓励参观者提出他们自己的问题,即思想与肠道、身体与微生物之间的关系。
{"title":"<i>Mind the Gut</i>-displaying microbiome research through artistic collaboration.","authors":"Adam Bencard,&nbsp;Louise Emma Whiteley","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2018.1555433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2018.1555433","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents the <i>Mind the Gut</i> exhibition, opened in 2017 at the Medical Museion, the University of Copenhagen's museum for the culture and history of medicine. It is an experimental exhibition combining science, art, and history in an examination of the relationship between mind and gut, including the trillions of microbes that inhabits them. <i>Mind the Gut</i> was the result of a 2-year-long research and curatorial process, which began in 2015 when Museion was awarded the Bikuben Foundation Vision Award. The exhibition brings together the long history of attempts to understand and intervene in the relationship between mind and gut, between emotions and digestion with cutting-edge biomedical research, and includes the perspectives of science, medicine, and personal experience, via a combination of artworks, historical objects from the Medical Museion collections, items from laboratories, and individual stories. The exhibition is organized around different ways the body has been handled in order to intervene in interactions between mind, gut, and bacteria, including imaging, electrifying, feeding, drugging, and opening surgically. This paper outlines some of the thoughts on science communication that motivated the exhibition, discussing why the displays emphasize the exploratory over the explanatory. Also discussed are several artistic collaborations that formed part of the displays. Ultimately, <i>Mind the Gut</i> is created to be a public space that encourages reflection and curiosity, by showing how biomedicine fits into social, cultural, historical, and directly personal contexts. The exhibition does not aim to provide answers about what food the visitors should eat or what the truth of how gut and brain interactions might be. Rather, it emphasizes process over result, hopefully encouraging the visitors to ask their own questions of the relationship between mind and gut, between body and microbes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":"29 2","pages":"1555433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16512235.2018.1555433","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36872028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
'Neurasthenia gastrica' revisited: perceptions of nerve-gut interactions in nervous exhaustion, 1880-1920. “胃神经衰弱”重访:1880-1920年神经衰竭中神经-肠道相互作用的感知。
Pub Date : 2018-12-25 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/16512235.2018.1553438
Kristine Lillestøl

In this paper, some of the medical literature on the historical disease-concept of 'neurasthenia gastrica' is reviewed. Neurasthenia gastrica was defined as a sub-unit of the wider category of neurasthenia, also referred to as nervous exhaustion or nervous weakness. Neurasthenia was a commonly used diagnostic label at the end of the nineteenth century and a few decades onwards, and was used to describe a wide variety of symptoms for which no 'organic' basis could be found. In neurasthenia gastrica, however, the gastrointestinal symptoms predominated, and there was considerable debate as to how the gut interacted with the central nervous system in the development of these ailments. Some of these discussions may be seen as historical precedents for the current debates on the brain-gut-microbiota axis, particularly in relation to the so-called functional gastrointestinal disorders.

本文对“神经衰弱性胃炎”这一历史疾病概念的一些医学文献进行了综述。胃神经衰弱被定义为更广泛的神经衰弱的一个亚单位,也被称为神经衰竭或神经衰弱。在19世纪末和几十年后,神经衰弱是一种常用的诊断标签,它被用来描述各种各样的症状,而这些症状没有“有机”基础。然而,在神经衰弱性胃痛中,胃肠道症状占主导地位,关于肠道如何在这些疾病的发展中与中枢神经系统相互作用存在相当大的争议。其中一些讨论可能被视为当前关于脑-肠-微生物群轴的辩论的历史先例,特别是在所谓的功能性胃肠道疾病方面。
{"title":"'Neurasthenia gastrica' revisited: perceptions of nerve-gut interactions in nervous exhaustion, 1880-1920.","authors":"Kristine Lillestøl","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2018.1553438","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2018.1553438","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, some of the medical literature on the historical disease-concept of 'neurasthenia gastrica' is reviewed. Neurasthenia gastrica was defined as a sub-unit of the wider category of neurasthenia, also referred to as nervous exhaustion or nervous weakness. Neurasthenia was a commonly used diagnostic label at the end of the nineteenth century and a few decades onwards, and was used to describe a wide variety of symptoms for which no 'organic' basis could be found. In neurasthenia gastrica, however, the gastrointestinal symptoms predominated, and there was considerable debate as to how the gut interacted with the central nervous system in the development of these ailments. Some of these discussions may be seen as historical precedents for the current debates on the brain-gut-microbiota axis, particularly in relation to the so-called functional gastrointestinal disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":"29 2","pages":"1553438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16512235.2018.1553438","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36872027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Antimicrobial resistance due to the content of potentially toxic metals in soil and fertilizing products. 土壤和肥料产品中潜在有毒金属含量导致的抗菌剂抗药性。
Pub Date : 2018-12-11 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/16512235.2018.1548248
Siamak Yazdankhah, Eystein Skjerve, Yngvild Wasteson

Potentially toxic metals (PTM), along with PTM-resistant bacteria and PTM-resistance genes, may be introduced into soil and water through sewage systems, direct excretion, land application of biosolids (organic matter recycled from sewage, especially for use in agriculture) or animal manures as fertilizers, and irrigation with wastewater or treated effluents. In this review article, we have evaluated whether the content of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (CrIII + CrVI), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn) in soil and fertilizing products play a role in the development, spreading, and persistence of bacterial resistance to these elements, as well as cross- or co-resistance to antimicrobial agents. Several of the articles included in this review reported the development of resistance against PTM in both sewage and manure. Although PTM like As, Hg, Co, Cd, Pb, and Ni may be present in the fertilizing products, the concentration may be low since they occur due to pollution. In contrast, trace metals like Cu and Zn are actively added to animal feed in many countries. In several studies, several different bacterial species were shown to have a reduced susceptibility towards several PTM, simultaneously. However, neither the source of resistant bacteria nor the minimum co-selective concentration (MCC) for resistance induction are known. Co- or cross-resistance against highly important antimicrobials and critically important antimicrobials were identified in some of the bacterial isolates. This suggest that there is a genetic linkage or direct genetic causality between genetic determinants to these widely divergent antimicrobials, and metal resistance. Data regarding the routes and frequencies of transmission of AMR from bacteria of environmental origin to bacteria of animal and human origin were sparse. Due to the lack of such data, it is difficult to estimate the probability of development, transmission, and persistence of PTM resistance. Abbreviations: PTM: potentially toxic metals; AMR: antimicrobial resistance; ARG: antimicrobial resistance gene; MCC: minimum co-selective concentration; MDR: multidrug resistance; ARB: antimicrobial resistant bacteria; HGT: horizontal gene transfer; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.

潜在有毒金属 (PTM) 以及抗 PTM 细菌和抗 PTM 基因可能会通过污水系统、直接排泄、在土地上施用生物固体(从污水中回收的有机物,特别是用于农业的有机物)或动物粪便作为肥料,以及用废水或经处理的污水进行灌溉等方式进入土壤和水中。在这篇综述文章中,我们评估了土壤和肥料产品中砷(As)、镉(Cd)、铬(CrIII + CrVI)、铜(Cu)、铅(Pb)、汞(Hg)、镍(Ni)和锌(Zn)的含量是否会导致细菌对这些元素产生抗药性、交叉抗药性或共同抗药性,以及抗药性的发展、传播和持久性。本综述中的几篇文章报告了污水和粪便中 PTM 的抗药性发展情况。尽管肥料产品中可能含有砷、汞、钴、镉、铅和镍等 PTM,但由于污染原因,其浓度可能很低。相比之下,许多国家在动物饲料中积极添加铜和锌等微量金属。有几项研究表明,几种不同的细菌同时对几种 PTM 的敏感性降低。然而,耐药性细菌的来源和诱导耐药性的最小共选择浓度(MCC)都不清楚。在一些细菌分离物中发现了对高度重要的抗菌素和极其重要的抗菌素的共抗性或交叉抗性。这表明,这些差异很大的抗菌素的遗传决定因素与金属抗药性之间存在遗传联系或直接的遗传因果关系。有关 AMR 从环境源细菌传播到动物和人类源细菌的途径和频率的数据很少。由于缺乏此类数据,很难估计 PTM 耐药性的发展、传播和持续存在的概率。缩写:PTM:潜在毒性金属;AMR:抗菌药耐药性;ARG:抗菌药耐药性基因;MCC:最小共选择浓度;MDR:多重耐药性;ARB:抗菌药耐药菌;HGT:水平基因转移;MIC:最小抑制浓度。
{"title":"Antimicrobial resistance due to the content of potentially toxic metals in soil and fertilizing products.","authors":"Siamak Yazdankhah, Eystein Skjerve, Yngvild Wasteson","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2018.1548248","DOIUrl":"10.1080/16512235.2018.1548248","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Potentially toxic metals (PTM), along with PTM-resistant bacteria and PTM-resistance genes, may be introduced into soil and water through sewage systems, direct excretion, land application of biosolids (organic matter recycled from sewage, especially for use in agriculture) or animal manures as fertilizers, and irrigation with wastewater or treated effluents. In this review article, we have evaluated whether the content of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (CrIII + CrVI), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn) in soil and fertilizing products play a role in the development, spreading, and persistence of bacterial resistance to these elements, as well as cross- or co-resistance to antimicrobial agents. Several of the articles included in this review reported the development of resistance against PTM in both sewage and manure. Although PTM like As, Hg, Co, Cd, Pb, and Ni may be present in the fertilizing products, the concentration may be low since they occur due to pollution. In contrast, trace metals like Cu and Zn are actively added to animal feed in many countries. In several studies, several different bacterial species were shown to have a reduced susceptibility towards several PTM, simultaneously. However, neither the source of resistant bacteria nor the minimum co-selective concentration (MCC) for resistance induction are known. Co- or cross-resistance against <i>highly important antimicrobials</i> and <i>critically important antimicrobials</i> were identified in some of the bacterial isolates. This suggest that there is a genetic linkage or direct genetic causality between genetic determinants to these widely divergent antimicrobials, and metal resistance. Data regarding the routes and frequencies of transmission of AMR from bacteria of environmental origin to bacteria of animal and human origin were sparse. Due to the lack of such data, it is difficult to estimate the probability of development, transmission, and persistence of PTM resistance. <b>Abbreviations:</b> PTM: potentially toxic metals; AMR: antimicrobial resistance; ARG: antimicrobial resistance gene; MCC: minimum co-selective concentration; MDR: multidrug resistance; ARB: antimicrobial resistant bacteria; HGT: horizontal gene transfer; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.</p>","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":"29 1","pages":"1548248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273308/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38056871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Selection of fast and slow growing bacteria from fecal microbiota using continuous culture with changing dilution rate. 改变稀释率连续培养从粪便微生物群中选择生长快、慢的细菌。
Pub Date : 2018-11-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/16512235.2018.1549922
K Adamberg, S Adamberg

Background: Nutrient and energy metabolism in human colon depends on bacterial growth rate that is determined by the colonic transit rate. Objective: A novel approach, De-stat culture was used to distinguish the fast and slow growing sub-populations from fecal microbiota. Design: The enrichment and metabolism of bacteria from pooled fecal cultures of children was studied at dilution rates D = 0.2-0.0 1/h in mucin-supplemented media containing either arabinogalactan or apple pectin. Results: The study revealed clear differentiation of the fecal microbiota at higher (above 0.1 1/h) and lower (below 0.1 1/h) dilution rates, along with metabolic changes. Similarity of the fast and slow growing bacteria was observed in two different fecal pools and on both substrates, suggesting the dilution rate as the main triggering parameter for selection of bacteria. At high dilution rates, the species Collinsella aerofaciens, Dorea longicatena, Escherichia coli, Lachnoclostridium torques, and different Bacteroides (B. caccae, B. fragilis, B. ovatus, B. thetaiotaomicron, B. vulgatus) were dominant in both media variants. At low dilution rates, Akkermansia muciniphila, Eisenbergiella tayi, Negativicoccus succinivorans, and a group of Ruminococcaceae became dominant in both media and in both fecal pools. This change in bacterial population accompanied by the increased production of propionic and butyric acids as well as higher consumption of alanine and branched chain amino acids at low dilution rates. Conclusions: The study suggests that specific growth rate has important effect on the dynamics of colon microbiota. Manipulation of the proportions of fast and slow growing gut bacteria through modulation of the transit rate could be a target in human nutrition studies. The De-stat study would enable to predict changes in microbiota composition associated with the decrease or increase of the colonic transit rate.

背景:人类结肠的营养和能量代谢取决于细菌的生长速度,而细菌的生长速度又取决于结肠的转运速度。目的:采用De-stat培养方法区分粪便微生物群中快速和缓慢生长的亚群。设计:在稀释率为D = 0.2-0.0 1/h的条件下,研究了儿童粪便培养液中细菌的富集和代谢,培养基中分别含有阿拉伯半乳聚糖或苹果果胶。结果:研究显示,在较高(高于0.1 1/h)和较低(低于0.1 1/h)稀释率下,粪便微生物群明显分化,并伴有代谢变化。在两个不同的粪便池和两种基质上观察到快速和缓慢生长的细菌的相似性,提示稀释率是细菌选择的主要触发参数。在高稀释率条件下,两种培养基中均以气facselella、Dorea longicatena、Escherichia coli、Lachnoclostridium torques和不同拟杆菌(B. caccae、B. fragilis、B. ovatus、B. thetaiotaomicron、B. vulgatus)为优势菌种。在低稀释率下,嗜粘液阿克曼氏菌、艾森伯格氏菌、琥珀毒负球菌和一组瘤胃球菌科在两种培养基和两个粪便池中都占主导地位。这种细菌种群的变化伴随着丙酸和丁酸产量的增加以及丙氨酸和支链氨基酸在低稀释率下的更高消耗。结论:特定生长速率对肠道菌群动态有重要影响。通过调节转运速率来控制快速和缓慢生长的肠道细菌的比例可能是人类营养研究的一个目标。De-stat的研究将能够预测与结肠转运率降低或增加相关的微生物群组成的变化。
{"title":"Selection of fast and slow growing bacteria from fecal microbiota using continuous culture with changing dilution rate.","authors":"K Adamberg,&nbsp;S Adamberg","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2018.1549922","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2018.1549922","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Nutrient and energy metabolism in human colon depends on bacterial growth rate that is determined by the colonic transit rate. <b>Objective</b>: A novel approach, De-stat culture was used to distinguish the fast and slow growing sub-populations from fecal microbiota. <b>Design</b>: The enrichment and metabolism of bacteria from pooled fecal cultures of children was studied at dilution rates <i>D</i> = 0.2-0.0 1/h in mucin-supplemented media containing either arabinogalactan or apple pectin. <b>Results</b>: The study revealed clear differentiation of the fecal microbiota at higher (above 0.1 1/h) and lower (below 0.1 1/h) dilution rates, along with metabolic changes. Similarity of the fast and slow growing bacteria was observed in two different fecal pools and on both substrates, suggesting the dilution rate as the main triggering parameter for selection of bacteria. At high dilution rates, the species <i>Collinsella aerofaciens, Dorea longicatena, Escherichia coli, Lachnoclostridium torques</i>, and different <i>Bacteroides</i> (<i>B. caccae, B. fragilis, B. ovatus, B. thetaiotaomicron, B. vulgatus</i>) were dominant in both media variants. At low dilution rates, <i>Akkermansia muciniphila, Eisenbergiella tayi, Negativicoccus succinivorans</i>, and a group of Ruminococcaceae became dominant in both media and in both fecal pools. This change in bacterial population accompanied by the increased production of propionic and butyric acids as well as higher consumption of alanine and branched chain amino acids at low dilution rates. <b>Conclusions</b>: The study suggests that specific growth rate has important effect on the dynamics of colon microbiota. Manipulation of the proportions of fast and slow growing gut bacteria through modulation of the transit rate could be a target in human nutrition studies. The De-stat study would enable to predict changes in microbiota composition associated with the decrease or increase of the colonic transit rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":"29 1","pages":"1549922"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16512235.2018.1549922","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36811214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Gut thinking: the gut microbiome and mental health beyond the head. 肠道思维:超越头脑的肠道微生物组和心理健康。
Pub Date : 2018-11-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/16512235.2018.1548250
Grace Lucas

Background: In recent decades, dominant models of mental illness have become increasingly focused on the head, with mental disorders being figured as brain disorders. However, research into the active role that the microbiome-gut-brain axis plays in affecting mood and behaviour may lead to the conclusion that mental health is more than an internalised problem of individual brains. Objective: This article explores the implications of shifting understandings about mental health that have come about through research into links between the gut microbiome and mental health problems such as depression and anxiety. It aims to analyse the different ways that the lines between mind and body and mental and physical health are re-shaped by this research, which is starting to inform clinical and public understanding. Design: As mental health has become a pressing issue of political and public concern it has become increasingly constructed in socio-cultural and personal terms beyond clinical spaces, requiring a conceptual response that exceeds biomedical inquiry. This article argues that an interdisciplinary critical medical humanities approach is well positioned to analyse the impact of microbiome-gut-brain research on conceptions of mind. Results: The entanglement of mind and matter evinced by microbiome-gut-brain axis research potentially provides a different way to conceptualise the physical and social concomitants of mental distress. Conclusion: Mental health is not narrowly located in the head but is assimilated by the physical body and intermingled with the natural world, requiring different methods of research to unfold the meanings and implications of gut thinking for conceptions of human selfhood.

背景:近几十年来,主要的精神疾病模型越来越关注头部,精神障碍被认为是大脑障碍。然而,对微生物组-肠-脑轴在影响情绪和行为方面发挥的积极作用的研究可能会得出这样的结论,即心理健康不仅仅是个体大脑的内在问题。目的:本文探讨了通过研究肠道微生物组与抑郁和焦虑等心理健康问题之间的联系,人们对心理健康的理解发生了转变。它旨在分析这项研究以不同的方式重塑身心和身心健康之间的界限,这项研究开始为临床和公众的理解提供信息。设计:随着心理健康成为政治和公众关注的一个紧迫问题,它越来越多地从社会文化和个人角度构建,超出了临床空间,需要超越生物医学调查的概念回应。本文认为,跨学科的批判性医学人文方法非常适合分析微生物组-肠-脑研究对心智概念的影响。结果:微生物组-肠-脑轴研究表明,精神和物质的纠缠可能为概念化精神痛苦的身体和社会伴随因素提供了一种不同的方式。结论:心理健康并不局限于大脑,而是被身体吸收并与自然世界融为一体,需要不同的研究方法来揭示肠道思维对人类自我概念的意义和含义。
{"title":"Gut thinking: the gut microbiome and mental health beyond the head.","authors":"Grace Lucas","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2018.1548250","DOIUrl":"10.1080/16512235.2018.1548250","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In recent decades, dominant models of mental illness have become increasingly focused on the head, with mental disorders being figured as brain disorders. However, research into the active role that the microbiome-gut-brain axis plays in affecting mood and behaviour may lead to the conclusion that mental health is more than an internalised problem of individual brains. <b>Objective:</b> This article explores the implications of shifting understandings about mental health that have come about through research into links between the gut microbiome and mental health problems such as depression and anxiety. It aims to analyse the different ways that the lines between mind and body and mental and physical health are re-shaped by this research, which is starting to inform clinical and public understanding. <b>Design:</b> As mental health has become a pressing issue of political and public concern it has become increasingly constructed in socio-cultural and personal terms beyond clinical spaces, requiring a conceptual response that exceeds biomedical inquiry. This article argues that an interdisciplinary critical medical humanities approach is well positioned to analyse the impact of microbiome-gut-brain research on conceptions of mind. <b>Results:</b> The entanglement of mind and matter evinced by microbiome-gut-brain axis research potentially provides a different way to conceptualise the physical and social concomitants of mental distress. <b>Conclusion:</b> Mental health is not narrowly located in the head but is assimilated by the physical body and intermingled with the natural world, requiring different methods of research to unfold the meanings and implications of gut thinking for conceptions of human selfhood.</p>","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":"29 2","pages":"1548250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282467/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36811215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Autointoxication and historical precursors of the microbiome-gut-brain axis. 自身中毒和微生物组-肠-脑轴的历史前兆。
Pub Date : 2018-11-27 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/16512235.2018.1548249
Manon Mathias

This article focuses on autointoxication, a discredited medical theory from the late nineteenth century that provides important points of reflection for today's research on the role of microbes in the human gut for mental health. It considers how the theory of autointoxication, which came into great prominence amongst physicians and the general public worldwide, fell from grace by the middle of the twentieth century, and briefly asks why studies of the human microbiome are now back in vogue. It departs from earlier articles on the topic firstly by arguing that autointoxication theory was especially prevalent in France, and secondly by focusing on the application of this theory to mental health. Bringing to light medical treatises and theses from this period which have so far remained unexamined, it shows that examining the development and reception of medical theories form the past can help us today in understanding both the pitfalls and promise of research in this area.

这篇文章的重点是自中毒,这是一个来自19世纪末的不可信的医学理论,为今天关于微生物在人类肠道中对心理健康的作用的研究提供了重要的反思点。它考虑了在世界各地的医生和公众中非常突出的自身中毒理论是如何在20世纪中叶失宠的,并简要询问了为什么人类微生物组的研究现在重新流行起来。它与早期关于这一主题的文章不同,首先是认为自主中毒理论在法国特别流行,其次是关注这一理论在心理健康中的应用。揭示了这一时期迄今为止未经审查的医学论文和论文,这表明,审视过去医学理论的发展和接受,可以帮助我们今天理解这一领域研究的陷阱和前景。
{"title":"Autointoxication and historical precursors of the microbiome-gut-brain axis.","authors":"Manon Mathias","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2018.1548249","DOIUrl":"10.1080/16512235.2018.1548249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article focuses on autointoxication, a discredited medical theory from the late nineteenth century that provides important points of reflection for today's research on the role of microbes in the human gut for mental health. It considers how the theory of autointoxication, which came into great prominence amongst physicians and the general public worldwide, fell from grace by the middle of the twentieth century, and briefly asks why studies of the human microbiome are now back in vogue. It departs from earlier articles on the topic firstly by arguing that autointoxication theory was especially prevalent in France, and secondly by focusing on the application of this theory to mental health. Bringing to light medical treatises and theses from this period which have so far remained unexamined, it shows that examining the development and reception of medical theories form the past can help us today in understanding both the pitfalls and promise of research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":"29 2","pages":"1548249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6263106/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36748069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gut-brain axis in history and culture 历史文化中的肠脑轴
Pub Date : 2018-11-23 DOI: 10.1080/16512235.2019.1602995
J. Valeur
The gut–brain axis and the microbiome have recently acquired an important position in explaining a wide range of human behaviours and emotions. Researchers have typically presented developments in understandings of the microbiome as radical and new, offering huge potential for better understandings of our bodies and what it means to be human. Without refuting the value of this research, this article insists that, traditionally, doctors and patients acknowledged the complex interactions between their guts and emotions, although using alternative models often based on nerves or psychology. For example, nineteenthcentury doctors and patients would have been well acquainted with the idea that their stomachs and minds were somehow connected, and that this interaction could produce positive or negative physical and mental health impacts. To demonstrate this, this article offers a snapshot of medical and public thought on (what we currently call) the gut–brain axis in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, using Britain as a key case study due to the prevalence of gastric problems in that country. It commences by exploring how nineteenth-century doctors and patients took for granted the intimate relations between gut and mind and used their ideas on this to debate personal health, medical theory and social and political discourse. The article then moves on to argue that various medical sub-disciplines emerged (anatomy, physiology, surgery) that threatened to reduce the stomach to a physiologically complex organ but, in doing so, inadvertently began to erase ideas of a gut–mind connection. However, these new models proved unsatisfactory, allowing more holistic ideas of the body–mind relationship to continue to carry currency in twentieth-century psychological and medical thought. In the late century, pharmacological developments once again threatened to minimise the gut–brain axis, before it once again became popular in the early twenty-first century, now debated through a new language of microbiology. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 31 August 2018 Revised 18 October 2018 Accepted 25 October 2018
肠脑轴和微生物组最近在解释广泛的人类行为和情绪方面获得了重要地位。研究人员通常将对微生物组的理解进展描述为激进和全新的,为更好地理解我们的身体及其对人类的意义提供了巨大的潜力。在不否定这项研究价值的前提下,这篇文章坚持认为,传统上,医生和病人都承认他们的肠道和情绪之间存在复杂的相互作用,尽管使用的是基于神经或心理学的替代模型。例如,19世纪的医生和病人都很清楚,他们的胃和大脑在某种程度上是相连的,这种相互作用会对身体和精神健康产生积极或消极的影响。为了证明这一点,本文简要介绍了19世纪和20世纪医学界和公众对(我们目前所说的)肠脑轴的看法,并以英国为例,因为该国胃病普遍存在。它首先探讨了19世纪的医生和病人是如何理所当然地将肠道和心灵之间的亲密关系视为理所当然的,并利用他们的观点来辩论个人健康、医学理论以及社会和政治话语。文章接着指出,各种各样的医学分支学科(解剖学、生理学、外科)的出现,威胁着要把胃简化为一个生理上复杂的器官,但在这样做的过程中,无意中开始抹去肠道与心灵联系的想法。然而,这些新的模型被证明是不令人满意的,这使得关于身心关系的更全面的观点在20世纪的心理学和医学思想中继续流行。在20世纪后期,药理学的发展再次威胁到最小化肠脑轴,直到21世纪初它再次流行起来,现在通过一种新的微生物学语言进行辩论。文章历史2018年8月31日收稿修改2018年10月18日接受2018年10月25日
{"title":"Gut-brain axis in history and culture","authors":"J. Valeur","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2019.1602995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2019.1602995","url":null,"abstract":"The gut–brain axis and the microbiome have recently acquired an important position in explaining a wide range of human behaviours and emotions. Researchers have typically presented developments in understandings of the microbiome as radical and new, offering huge potential for better understandings of our bodies and what it means to be human. Without refuting the value of this research, this article insists that, traditionally, doctors and patients acknowledged the complex interactions between their guts and emotions, although using alternative models often based on nerves or psychology. For example, nineteenthcentury doctors and patients would have been well acquainted with the idea that their stomachs and minds were somehow connected, and that this interaction could produce positive or negative physical and mental health impacts. To demonstrate this, this article offers a snapshot of medical and public thought on (what we currently call) the gut–brain axis in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, using Britain as a key case study due to the prevalence of gastric problems in that country. It commences by exploring how nineteenth-century doctors and patients took for granted the intimate relations between gut and mind and used their ideas on this to debate personal health, medical theory and social and political discourse. The article then moves on to argue that various medical sub-disciplines emerged (anatomy, physiology, surgery) that threatened to reduce the stomach to a physiologically complex organ but, in doing so, inadvertently began to erase ideas of a gut–mind connection. However, these new models proved unsatisfactory, allowing more holistic ideas of the body–mind relationship to continue to carry currency in twentieth-century psychological and medical thought. In the late century, pharmacological developments once again threatened to minimise the gut–brain axis, before it once again became popular in the early twenty-first century, now debated through a new language of microbiology. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 31 August 2018 Revised 18 October 2018 Accepted 25 October 2018","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16512235.2019.1602995","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47415451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Gut-brain axis in history and culture 历史文化中的肠脑轴
Pub Date : 2018-11-23 DOI: 10.1080/16512235.2019.1567968
{"title":"Gut-brain axis in history and culture","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2019.1567968","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2019.1567968","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16512235.2019.1567968","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46612851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Special Issue Title Page - Gut-brain axis in history and culture 特刊标题页-历史文化中的肠脑轴
Pub Date : 2018-11-23 DOI: 10.1080/16512235.2019.1598041
{"title":"Special Issue Title Page - Gut-brain axis in history and culture","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2019.1598041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2019.1598041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16512235.2019.1598041","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46968870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contextualising the microbiota-gut-brain axis in history and culture. 将微生物群-肠-脑轴置于历史和文化背景中。
Pub Date : 2018-11-13 DOI: 10.1080/16512235.2019.1546267
Alison M Moore, Manon Mathias, Jørgen Valeur
This special edition on humanistic approaches to the microbiota–gut–brain axis was inspired by two symposia organised by literary scholar Dr Manon Mathias at the University of Aberdeen in 2017 and at the University of Glasgow in 2018, both involving the participation of medical historian Dr Alison M. Moore and gastroenterological researcher Dr Jørgen Valeur, with all the contributors to this special edition having spoken at one or other symposium. Mathias and Moore are among the rare cohort of humanities scholars who approach past literary, cultural and medical concepts with the aim of contextualising current medical models and research findings, while Valeur is among the even rarer cohort of medical researchers and clinicians to see inherent value in humanistic understandings of health. It is the shared premise of all three editors that historical and cultural perspectives enrich the current understanding of microbial ecology, and the science of microbe–host interactions. One reason it should interest all medical researchers and clinicians to read the articles in a special edition such as this, is to consider what is truly novel in current scientific models and what may be inherited from past medical concepts. Such earlier concepts may help or hinder current science, but without researchers knowing anything about them, it is most likely that their influence will not be helpful. As the American enteric nervous system researcher Michael D. Gershon noted in his 1998 book on the Second Brain, ‘hubris for scientists comes from inadequate knowledge and appreciation of the past’ [1]. Indeed, failures to see what is truly new in the treatment of gastroenterological disorders can be found throughout the scientific record. The history of faecal microbial transplant (FMT) is a case in point: though often claimed as a ‘new’ therapy [2], it has existed in the form of oral administration in European medical traditions since Ancient Greece, featured in severalmajorworks ofmedical description of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries [3], and has been used in Chinese medical traditions since the Don-jin dynasty (4 century CE) [4]. Rectal delivery of FMT was used by the American doctor I.O. Wilson in 1910, following the identification of changes in faecal bacterial composition among patients with functional bowel disorders [5]. Thus, FMT is anything but ‘new’ and its historical and trans-cultural ubiquity may indeed lend support to the emergent scientific model of the gut microbiome as an essential organ of the human body, composed of organisms that have co-evolved with our own cells such that they are to some extent ‘us’. This indeed is the very argument that FMT researcher Alexander Khoruts has made for why this therapy for Clostridium difficile should be seen not as a ‘drug’ but as a ‘transplant’ [6]. Themounting evidence for commensal and symbiotic intestinal microbes lends itself to this interpretation, and is consistent with the acceptance of the microbia
{"title":"Contextualising the microbiota-gut-brain axis in history and culture.","authors":"Alison M Moore,&nbsp;Manon Mathias,&nbsp;Jørgen Valeur","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2019.1546267","DOIUrl":"10.1080/16512235.2019.1546267","url":null,"abstract":"This special edition on humanistic approaches to the microbiota–gut–brain axis was inspired by two symposia organised by literary scholar Dr Manon Mathias at the University of Aberdeen in 2017 and at the University of Glasgow in 2018, both involving the participation of medical historian Dr Alison M. Moore and gastroenterological researcher Dr Jørgen Valeur, with all the contributors to this special edition having spoken at one or other symposium. Mathias and Moore are among the rare cohort of humanities scholars who approach past literary, cultural and medical concepts with the aim of contextualising current medical models and research findings, while Valeur is among the even rarer cohort of medical researchers and clinicians to see inherent value in humanistic understandings of health. It is the shared premise of all three editors that historical and cultural perspectives enrich the current understanding of microbial ecology, and the science of microbe–host interactions. One reason it should interest all medical researchers and clinicians to read the articles in a special edition such as this, is to consider what is truly novel in current scientific models and what may be inherited from past medical concepts. Such earlier concepts may help or hinder current science, but without researchers knowing anything about them, it is most likely that their influence will not be helpful. As the American enteric nervous system researcher Michael D. Gershon noted in his 1998 book on the Second Brain, ‘hubris for scientists comes from inadequate knowledge and appreciation of the past’ [1]. Indeed, failures to see what is truly new in the treatment of gastroenterological disorders can be found throughout the scientific record. The history of faecal microbial transplant (FMT) is a case in point: though often claimed as a ‘new’ therapy [2], it has existed in the form of oral administration in European medical traditions since Ancient Greece, featured in severalmajorworks ofmedical description of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries [3], and has been used in Chinese medical traditions since the Don-jin dynasty (4 century CE) [4]. Rectal delivery of FMT was used by the American doctor I.O. Wilson in 1910, following the identification of changes in faecal bacterial composition among patients with functional bowel disorders [5]. Thus, FMT is anything but ‘new’ and its historical and trans-cultural ubiquity may indeed lend support to the emergent scientific model of the gut microbiome as an essential organ of the human body, composed of organisms that have co-evolved with our own cells such that they are to some extent ‘us’. This indeed is the very argument that FMT researcher Alexander Khoruts has made for why this therapy for Clostridium difficile should be seen not as a ‘drug’ but as a ‘transplant’ [6]. Themounting evidence for commensal and symbiotic intestinal microbes lends itself to this interpretation, and is consistent with the acceptance of the microbia","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":"30 Suppl 1","pages":"1546267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16512235.2019.1546267","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36746988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
期刊
Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1