Brian Taylor, Campbell Killick, Teresa Bertotti, Guy Enosh, Joel Gautschi, Johanna Hietamäki, Alessandro Sicora, Andrew Whittaker
{"title":"欧洲社会工作研究协会SIG研究决策,评估和风险。","authors":"Brian Taylor, Campbell Killick, Teresa Bertotti, Guy Enosh, Joel Gautschi, Johanna Hietamäki, Alessandro Sicora, Andrew Whittaker","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The increasing interest in professional judgement and decision making is often separate from the discourse about \"risk,\" and the time-honored focus on assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The need to develop research in and across these topics was recognized in the founding of a Decisions, Assessment, and Risk Special Interest Group (DARSIG) by the European Social Work Research Association in 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Group's interests include cognitive judgements; decision processes with clients, families, other professionals and courts; assessment tools and processes; the assessment, communication, and management of risk; and legal, ethical, and emotional aspects of these. This article outlines the founding and scope of DARSIG; gives an overview of decision making, assessment, and risk for practice; illustrates connections between these; and highlights future research directions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Professional knowledge about decision making, assessment, and risk complements knowledge about effectiveness of interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DARSIG promises to be a useful mechanism for the purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"15 1","pages":"82-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Social Work Research Association SIG to Study Decisions, Assessment, and Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Taylor, Campbell Killick, Teresa Bertotti, Guy Enosh, Joel Gautschi, Johanna Hietamäki, Alessandro Sicora, Andrew Whittaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The increasing interest in professional judgement and decision making is often separate from the discourse about \\\"risk,\\\" and the time-honored focus on assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The need to develop research in and across these topics was recognized in the founding of a Decisions, Assessment, and Risk Special Interest Group (DARSIG) by the European Social Work Research Association in 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Group's interests include cognitive judgements; decision processes with clients, families, other professionals and courts; assessment tools and processes; the assessment, communication, and management of risk; and legal, ethical, and emotional aspects of these. This article outlines the founding and scope of DARSIG; gives an overview of decision making, assessment, and risk for practice; illustrates connections between these; and highlights future research directions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Professional knowledge about decision making, assessment, and risk complements knowledge about effectiveness of interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DARSIG promises to be a useful mechanism for the purpose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evidence-informed social work\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"82-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evidence-informed social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
目的:对专业判断和决策制定的日益增长的兴趣通常与关于“风险”的论述和对评估的长期关注是分开的。方法:2014年,欧洲社会工作研究协会(European Social Work research Association)成立了一个决策、评估和风险特别兴趣小组(DARSIG),认识到在这些主题中开展研究的必要性。结果:群体利益包括认知判断;与客户、家属、其他专业人员和法院的决策过程;评估工具和程序;风险的评估、沟通和管理;以及法律,道德和情感方面的问题。本文概述了DARSIG的成立和范围;给出决策的概述,评估和风险的做法;说明了这些之间的联系;并指出了未来的研究方向。讨论:有关决策、评估和风险的专业知识补充了有关干预措施有效性的知识。结论:DARSIG有望成为一种有效的机制。
European Social Work Research Association SIG to Study Decisions, Assessment, and Risk.
Purpose: The increasing interest in professional judgement and decision making is often separate from the discourse about "risk," and the time-honored focus on assessment.
Method: The need to develop research in and across these topics was recognized in the founding of a Decisions, Assessment, and Risk Special Interest Group (DARSIG) by the European Social Work Research Association in 2014.
Results: The Group's interests include cognitive judgements; decision processes with clients, families, other professionals and courts; assessment tools and processes; the assessment, communication, and management of risk; and legal, ethical, and emotional aspects of these. This article outlines the founding and scope of DARSIG; gives an overview of decision making, assessment, and risk for practice; illustrates connections between these; and highlights future research directions.
Discussion: Professional knowledge about decision making, assessment, and risk complements knowledge about effectiveness of interventions.
Conclusion: DARSIG promises to be a useful mechanism for the purpose.