欧洲社会工作研究协会SIG研究决策,评估和风险。

Brian Taylor, Campbell Killick, Teresa Bertotti, Guy Enosh, Joel Gautschi, Johanna Hietamäki, Alessandro Sicora, Andrew Whittaker
{"title":"欧洲社会工作研究协会SIG研究决策,评估和风险。","authors":"Brian Taylor,&nbsp;Campbell Killick,&nbsp;Teresa Bertotti,&nbsp;Guy Enosh,&nbsp;Joel Gautschi,&nbsp;Johanna Hietamäki,&nbsp;Alessandro Sicora,&nbsp;Andrew Whittaker","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The increasing interest in professional judgement and decision making is often separate from the discourse about \"risk,\" and the time-honored focus on assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The need to develop research in and across these topics was recognized in the founding of a Decisions, Assessment, and Risk Special Interest Group (DARSIG) by the European Social Work Research Association in 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Group's interests include cognitive judgements; decision processes with clients, families, other professionals and courts; assessment tools and processes; the assessment, communication, and management of risk; and legal, ethical, and emotional aspects of these. This article outlines the founding and scope of DARSIG; gives an overview of decision making, assessment, and risk for practice; illustrates connections between these; and highlights future research directions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Professional knowledge about decision making, assessment, and risk complements knowledge about effectiveness of interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DARSIG promises to be a useful mechanism for the purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"15 1","pages":"82-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Social Work Research Association SIG to Study Decisions, Assessment, and Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Taylor,&nbsp;Campbell Killick,&nbsp;Teresa Bertotti,&nbsp;Guy Enosh,&nbsp;Joel Gautschi,&nbsp;Johanna Hietamäki,&nbsp;Alessandro Sicora,&nbsp;Andrew Whittaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The increasing interest in professional judgement and decision making is often separate from the discourse about \\\"risk,\\\" and the time-honored focus on assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The need to develop research in and across these topics was recognized in the founding of a Decisions, Assessment, and Risk Special Interest Group (DARSIG) by the European Social Work Research Association in 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Group's interests include cognitive judgements; decision processes with clients, families, other professionals and courts; assessment tools and processes; the assessment, communication, and management of risk; and legal, ethical, and emotional aspects of these. This article outlines the founding and scope of DARSIG; gives an overview of decision making, assessment, and risk for practice; illustrates connections between these; and highlights future research directions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Professional knowledge about decision making, assessment, and risk complements knowledge about effectiveness of interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DARSIG promises to be a useful mechanism for the purpose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evidence-informed social work\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"82-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evidence-informed social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

目的:对专业判断和决策制定的日益增长的兴趣通常与关于“风险”的论述和对评估的长期关注是分开的。方法:2014年,欧洲社会工作研究协会(European Social Work research Association)成立了一个决策、评估和风险特别兴趣小组(DARSIG),认识到在这些主题中开展研究的必要性。结果:群体利益包括认知判断;与客户、家属、其他专业人员和法院的决策过程;评估工具和程序;风险的评估、沟通和管理;以及法律,道德和情感方面的问题。本文概述了DARSIG的成立和范围;给出决策的概述,评估和风险的做法;说明了这些之间的联系;并指出了未来的研究方向。讨论:有关决策、评估和风险的专业知识补充了有关干预措施有效性的知识。结论:DARSIG有望成为一种有效的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
European Social Work Research Association SIG to Study Decisions, Assessment, and Risk.

Purpose: The increasing interest in professional judgement and decision making is often separate from the discourse about "risk," and the time-honored focus on assessment.

Method: The need to develop research in and across these topics was recognized in the founding of a Decisions, Assessment, and Risk Special Interest Group (DARSIG) by the European Social Work Research Association in 2014.

Results: The Group's interests include cognitive judgements; decision processes with clients, families, other professionals and courts; assessment tools and processes; the assessment, communication, and management of risk; and legal, ethical, and emotional aspects of these. This article outlines the founding and scope of DARSIG; gives an overview of decision making, assessment, and risk for practice; illustrates connections between these; and highlights future research directions.

Discussion: Professional knowledge about decision making, assessment, and risk complements knowledge about effectiveness of interventions.

Conclusion: DARSIG promises to be a useful mechanism for the purpose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Freeing Chinese Abused Women From Stereotype: A Pretest-Posttest Comparison Study on Group Intervention in Refuge Centers. Making and sustaining change from psychotherapy: A mixed methods study. Toward evidence-based anti-human trafficking policy: a rapid review of CSE rehabilitation and evaluation of Indian legislation. Developing your communication skills in social work. The new social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1