空心菌科,重点研究葫芦科和圆菌科。

IF 14.1 1区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY Studies in Mycology Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003
N. Valenzuela-Lopez , J.F. Cano-Lira , J. Guarro , D.A. Sutton , N. Wiederhold , P.W. Crous , A.M. Stchigel
{"title":"空心菌科,重点研究葫芦科和圆菌科。","authors":"N. Valenzuela-Lopez ,&nbsp;J.F. Cano-Lira ,&nbsp;J. Guarro ,&nbsp;D.A. Sutton ,&nbsp;N. Wiederhold ,&nbsp;P.W. Crous ,&nbsp;A.M. Stchigel","doi":"10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The taxonomy of the coelomycetes has undergone dramatic changes in recent years, but remains controversial due to the high number of taxa involved, their poor morphological differentiation, the rare occurrence of the sexual morphs, and rapid loss of fertility <em>in vitro</em>. In the present study, we revisited the families <em>Cucurbitariaceae</em> and <em>Didymellaceae</em> (<em>Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes</em>), which include numerous plant pathogens, endophytic species associated with a wide host range, and saprobes. The taxonomy of two of the most relevant genera, i.e. <em>Phoma</em> and <em>Pyrenochaeta</em>, remains ambiguous after several phylogenetic studies, and needs further revision. We have studied a total of 143 strains of coelomycetes from clinical or environmental origin, by combining the LSU, ITS, <em>tub</em>2 and <em>rpb</em>2 sequences for a multi-locus analysis and a detailed morphological comparison. The resulting phylogenetic tree revealed that some fungi previously considered as members of <em>Cucurbitariaceae</em> represented five different families, and four of them, <em>Neopyrenochaetaceae</em>, <em>Parapyrenochaetaceae</em>, <em>Pseudopyrenochaetaceae</em> and <em>Pyrenochaetopsidaceae</em>, are proposed here as new. Furthermore, 13 new genera, 28 new species, and 20 new combinations are proposed within the <em>Pleosporineae</em>. Moreover, four new typifications are introduced to stabilise the taxonomy of these fungi.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22036,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Mycology","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 1-69"},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003","citationCount":"113","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae\",\"authors\":\"N. Valenzuela-Lopez ,&nbsp;J.F. Cano-Lira ,&nbsp;J. Guarro ,&nbsp;D.A. Sutton ,&nbsp;N. Wiederhold ,&nbsp;P.W. Crous ,&nbsp;A.M. Stchigel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The taxonomy of the coelomycetes has undergone dramatic changes in recent years, but remains controversial due to the high number of taxa involved, their poor morphological differentiation, the rare occurrence of the sexual morphs, and rapid loss of fertility <em>in vitro</em>. In the present study, we revisited the families <em>Cucurbitariaceae</em> and <em>Didymellaceae</em> (<em>Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes</em>), which include numerous plant pathogens, endophytic species associated with a wide host range, and saprobes. The taxonomy of two of the most relevant genera, i.e. <em>Phoma</em> and <em>Pyrenochaeta</em>, remains ambiguous after several phylogenetic studies, and needs further revision. We have studied a total of 143 strains of coelomycetes from clinical or environmental origin, by combining the LSU, ITS, <em>tub</em>2 and <em>rpb</em>2 sequences for a multi-locus analysis and a detailed morphological comparison. The resulting phylogenetic tree revealed that some fungi previously considered as members of <em>Cucurbitariaceae</em> represented five different families, and four of them, <em>Neopyrenochaetaceae</em>, <em>Parapyrenochaetaceae</em>, <em>Pseudopyrenochaetaceae</em> and <em>Pyrenochaetopsidaceae</em>, are proposed here as new. Furthermore, 13 new genera, 28 new species, and 20 new combinations are proposed within the <em>Pleosporineae</em>. Moreover, four new typifications are introduced to stabilise the taxonomy of these fungi.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Mycology\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003\",\"citationCount\":\"113\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Mycology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166061617300490\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Mycology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166061617300490","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 113

摘要

近年来,腔肠菌的分类发生了巨大的变化,但由于涉及的类群数量多,形态分化差,性形态罕见,体外生殖力丧失迅速,因此仍然存在争议。在本研究中,我们重新审视了葫芦科和Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes),其中包括许多植物病原体,与广泛寄主范围相关的内生物种和物种。两个最相关的属,即Phoma和Pyrenochaeta的分类在经过几次系统发育研究后仍然不明确,需要进一步修订。我们通过LSU、ITS、tub2和rpb2序列的组合,对143株临床或环境来源的腔菌进行了多位点分析和详细的形态比较。系统发育树结果显示,一些以前被认为是葫芦科成员的真菌分别代表了5个不同的科,其中4个科,即新葡萄毛囊科、副葡萄毛囊科、假葡萄毛囊科和Pyrenochaetopsidaceae,在这里被作为新成员提出。在多孢菌科中发现13个新属、28个新种和20个新组合。此外,介绍了四种新的类型来稳定这些真菌的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae

The taxonomy of the coelomycetes has undergone dramatic changes in recent years, but remains controversial due to the high number of taxa involved, their poor morphological differentiation, the rare occurrence of the sexual morphs, and rapid loss of fertility in vitro. In the present study, we revisited the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes), which include numerous plant pathogens, endophytic species associated with a wide host range, and saprobes. The taxonomy of two of the most relevant genera, i.e. Phoma and Pyrenochaeta, remains ambiguous after several phylogenetic studies, and needs further revision. We have studied a total of 143 strains of coelomycetes from clinical or environmental origin, by combining the LSU, ITS, tub2 and rpb2 sequences for a multi-locus analysis and a detailed morphological comparison. The resulting phylogenetic tree revealed that some fungi previously considered as members of Cucurbitariaceae represented five different families, and four of them, Neopyrenochaetaceae, Parapyrenochaetaceae, Pseudopyrenochaetaceae and Pyrenochaetopsidaceae, are proposed here as new. Furthermore, 13 new genera, 28 new species, and 20 new combinations are proposed within the Pleosporineae. Moreover, four new typifications are introduced to stabilise the taxonomy of these fungi.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Mycology
Studies in Mycology 生物-真菌学
CiteScore
35.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The international journal Studies in Mycology focuses on advancing the understanding of filamentous fungi, yeasts, and various aspects of mycology. It publishes comprehensive systematic monographs as well as topical issues covering a wide range of subjects including biotechnology, ecology, molecular biology, pathology, and systematics. This Open-Access journal offers unrestricted access to its content. Each issue of Studies in Mycology consists of around 5 to 6 papers, either in the form of monographs or special focused topics. Unlike traditional length restrictions, the journal encourages submissions of manuscripts with a minimum of 50 A4 pages in print. This ensures a thorough exploration and presentation of the research findings, maximizing the depth of the published work.
期刊最新文献
What are the 100 most cited fungal genera? The genus Fomitopsis (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) reconsidered. Worldwide forest surveys reveal forty-three new species in Phytophthora major Clade 2 with fundamental implications for the evolution and biogeography of the genus and global plant biosecurity. Family matters inside the order Agaricales: systematic reorganization and classification of incertae sedis clitocyboid, pleurotoid and tricholomatoid taxa based on an updated 6-gene phylogeny A review of recently introduced Aspergillus, Penicillium, Talaromyces and other Eurotiales species
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1