患者对平价医疗法案在耳鼻喉科实践的意见:意识形态分歧。

Jared C Hiebert, Robert M Rhodes, Michael P Anderson, Nilesh R Vasan
{"title":"患者对平价医疗法案在耳鼻喉科实践的意见:意识形态分歧。","authors":"Jared C Hiebert,&nbsp;Robert M Rhodes,&nbsp;Michael P Anderson,&nbsp;Nilesh R Vasan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To assess patient opinion on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in an Otolaryngology practice and the factors that influence those opinions. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: An anonymous survey assessing patient opinion on the PPACA, demographic information, political affiliation, medical diagnosis, and insurance status was distributed to patients in three separate Otolaryngology clinics (General, cancer, and Low-income/Indigent) from April to June 2014. A total of 300 surveys were distributed and 207 were used for final analysis. The primary study outcome measures were patient opinion of the PPACA and statistically significant variables affecting that opinion. The association of Support for the PPACA and variables were tested using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: The only variables that showed a significant association with support for the PPACA were Political Party (p<0.0001) and Ethnicity (p=0.0050). Specifically, a higher proportion of Democrats support the PPACA than Republicans and a higher proportion of African Americans and Hispanic/Latinos support the PPACA than Whites and Native Americans. CONCLUSION: Our survey of current Otolaryngology patients mirrors national findings of the division between Republicans and Democrats in their attitudes towards the Affordable Care Act. Political party appears to be the most significant factor in shaping patient opinion on this controversial subject regardless of insurance status or cancer diagnosis and a higher proportion of African Americans and Hispanic/Latinos support the PPACA than Whites and Native Americans. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":75127,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association","volume":"109 9","pages":"441-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Opinion on the Affordable Care Act in an Otolaryngology Practice: the Ideological Divide.\",\"authors\":\"Jared C Hiebert,&nbsp;Robert M Rhodes,&nbsp;Michael P Anderson,&nbsp;Nilesh R Vasan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: To assess patient opinion on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in an Otolaryngology practice and the factors that influence those opinions. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: An anonymous survey assessing patient opinion on the PPACA, demographic information, political affiliation, medical diagnosis, and insurance status was distributed to patients in three separate Otolaryngology clinics (General, cancer, and Low-income/Indigent) from April to June 2014. A total of 300 surveys were distributed and 207 were used for final analysis. The primary study outcome measures were patient opinion of the PPACA and statistically significant variables affecting that opinion. The association of Support for the PPACA and variables were tested using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: The only variables that showed a significant association with support for the PPACA were Political Party (p<0.0001) and Ethnicity (p=0.0050). Specifically, a higher proportion of Democrats support the PPACA than Republicans and a higher proportion of African Americans and Hispanic/Latinos support the PPACA than Whites and Native Americans. CONCLUSION: Our survey of current Otolaryngology patients mirrors national findings of the division between Republicans and Democrats in their attitudes towards the Affordable Care Act. Political party appears to be the most significant factor in shaping patient opinion on this controversial subject regardless of insurance status or cancer diagnosis and a higher proportion of African Americans and Hispanic/Latinos support the PPACA than Whites and Native Americans. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"109 9\",\"pages\":\"441-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估患者对耳鼻喉科实践中患者保护和平价医疗法案(PPACA)的意见以及影响这些意见的因素。研究设计:观察性研究。方法:2014年4月至6月,对三个独立的耳鼻喉科诊所(普通科、癌症科和低收入/贫困科)的患者进行匿名调查,评估患者对PPACA的意见、人口统计信息、政治派别、医疗诊断和保险状况。共发放了300份调查问卷,其中207份用于最终分析。主要研究结果测量是患者对PPACA的意见和影响该意见的有统计学意义的变量。采用卡方检验检验PPACA支持度与变量的相关性。结果:唯一显示与PPACA支持显著相关的变量是政党(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Opinion on the Affordable Care Act in an Otolaryngology Practice: the Ideological Divide.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient opinion on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in an Otolaryngology practice and the factors that influence those opinions. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: An anonymous survey assessing patient opinion on the PPACA, demographic information, political affiliation, medical diagnosis, and insurance status was distributed to patients in three separate Otolaryngology clinics (General, cancer, and Low-income/Indigent) from April to June 2014. A total of 300 surveys were distributed and 207 were used for final analysis. The primary study outcome measures were patient opinion of the PPACA and statistically significant variables affecting that opinion. The association of Support for the PPACA and variables were tested using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: The only variables that showed a significant association with support for the PPACA were Political Party (p<0.0001) and Ethnicity (p=0.0050). Specifically, a higher proportion of Democrats support the PPACA than Republicans and a higher proportion of African Americans and Hispanic/Latinos support the PPACA than Whites and Native Americans. CONCLUSION: Our survey of current Otolaryngology patients mirrors national findings of the division between Republicans and Democrats in their attitudes towards the Affordable Care Act. Political party appears to be the most significant factor in shaping patient opinion on this controversial subject regardless of insurance status or cancer diagnosis and a higher proportion of African Americans and Hispanic/Latinos support the PPACA than Whites and Native Americans. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical question: Can virtual reality be an effective adjunctive to conventional treatment in patients with chronic lower back pain? Hospital Admission Rates and Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients with COVID-19 Discharged with Remote Patient Monitoring with or without HO2ME - A Value-Based Approach. Investigation of Geographical Disparities: The Use of An Interpolation Method For Cancer Registry Data. In patients with osteoarthritis, is curcumin, compared to placebo, effective in reducing pain? A Snapshot of Oklahoma's CHR/CHW Workforce: Results from the Region 6 Training Needs Assessment Survey, 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1