依那西普、阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗的剂量递增和联合治疗强化:CADURA研究。

Q4 Medicine Open Rheumatology Journal Pub Date : 2017-10-24 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874312901711010123
Carter Thorne, Gilles Boire, Andrew Chow, Kirsten Garces, Fang Liu, Melanie Poulin-Costello, Valery Walker, Boulos Haraoui
{"title":"依那西普、阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗的剂量递增和联合治疗强化:CADURA研究。","authors":"Carter Thorne,&nbsp;Gilles Boire,&nbsp;Andrew Chow,&nbsp;Kirsten Garces,&nbsp;Fang Liu,&nbsp;Melanie Poulin-Costello,&nbsp;Valery Walker,&nbsp;Boulos Haraoui","doi":"10.2174/1874312901711010123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare anti-TNF dose escalation, DMARD and/or glucocorticoid intensification, switches to another biologic, and drug and drug-related costs over 12 and 18 months for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initiating etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADA), or infliximab (IFX) in routine clinical practice across Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of biologic-naïve adult RA patients newly initiating ADA, ETN, or IFX between January 01, 2006 and December 31, 2012 from 11 practices across Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 314 patients in the 12-month analysis and 217 in the 18-month analysis. No dose escalation occurred with ETN over 12 and 18 months versus 38% and 32% for IFX (p<0.001) and 2% and 2% for ADA (p=0.199, p=0.218). Over 18 months, dose escalation and/or DMARD and/or glucocorticoid intensification was less frequent among ETN (16%) versus IFX (44%, p=0.005) and ADA (34%, p=0.004). By 18 months, 22% of patients initiating ADA had switched to another biologic compared with 6% of ETN patients (p=0.001).Patients initiating ETN had lower total (drug and drug-related) costs over 12 and 18 months compared to IFX, and no difference compared to ADA when adjusted for potential confounders. Patients with dose escalation had higher costs compared to those with no dose escalation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians were more likely to escalate the dose of IFX, but optimize co-therapy with ADA and ETN. ETN patients had no dose escalation and were less likely to have DMARD and/or glucocorticoid intensification than ADA patients. ETN-treated patients had lower costs compared to IFX patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39124,"journal":{"name":"Open Rheumatology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744265/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose Escalation and Co-therapy Intensification Between Etanercept, Adalimumab, and Infliximab: The CADURA Study.\",\"authors\":\"Carter Thorne,&nbsp;Gilles Boire,&nbsp;Andrew Chow,&nbsp;Kirsten Garces,&nbsp;Fang Liu,&nbsp;Melanie Poulin-Costello,&nbsp;Valery Walker,&nbsp;Boulos Haraoui\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874312901711010123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare anti-TNF dose escalation, DMARD and/or glucocorticoid intensification, switches to another biologic, and drug and drug-related costs over 12 and 18 months for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initiating etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADA), or infliximab (IFX) in routine clinical practice across Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of biologic-naïve adult RA patients newly initiating ADA, ETN, or IFX between January 01, 2006 and December 31, 2012 from 11 practices across Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 314 patients in the 12-month analysis and 217 in the 18-month analysis. No dose escalation occurred with ETN over 12 and 18 months versus 38% and 32% for IFX (p<0.001) and 2% and 2% for ADA (p=0.199, p=0.218). Over 18 months, dose escalation and/or DMARD and/or glucocorticoid intensification was less frequent among ETN (16%) versus IFX (44%, p=0.005) and ADA (34%, p=0.004). By 18 months, 22% of patients initiating ADA had switched to another biologic compared with 6% of ETN patients (p=0.001).Patients initiating ETN had lower total (drug and drug-related) costs over 12 and 18 months compared to IFX, and no difference compared to ADA when adjusted for potential confounders. Patients with dose escalation had higher costs compared to those with no dose escalation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians were more likely to escalate the dose of IFX, but optimize co-therapy with ADA and ETN. ETN patients had no dose escalation and were less likely to have DMARD and/or glucocorticoid intensification than ADA patients. ETN-treated patients had lower costs compared to IFX patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Rheumatology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5744265/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Rheumatology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874312901711010123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Rheumatology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874312901711010123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:比较加拿大常规临床实践中使用依那西普(ETN)、阿达木单抗(ADA)或英夫利昔单抗(IFX)的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者抗tnf剂量递增、DMARD和/或糖皮质激素强化、切换到另一种生物制剂、药物和药物相关成本超过12和18个月。方法:回顾性分析2006年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间加拿大11家医院中biologic-naïve成年RA患者新开始使用ADA、ETN或IFX的病例。结果:12个月分析314例,18个月分析217例。ETN在12个月和18个月内没有剂量增加,而IFX则为38%和32%(结论:医生更有可能增加IFX的剂量,但优化与ADA和ETN的联合治疗。ETN患者没有剂量递增,与ADA患者相比,发生DMARD和/或糖皮质激素强化的可能性更小。与IFX患者相比,etn治疗患者的费用更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dose Escalation and Co-therapy Intensification Between Etanercept, Adalimumab, and Infliximab: The CADURA Study.

Objective: To compare anti-TNF dose escalation, DMARD and/or glucocorticoid intensification, switches to another biologic, and drug and drug-related costs over 12 and 18 months for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients initiating etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADA), or infliximab (IFX) in routine clinical practice across Canada.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of biologic-naïve adult RA patients newly initiating ADA, ETN, or IFX between January 01, 2006 and December 31, 2012 from 11 practices across Canada.

Results: There were 314 patients in the 12-month analysis and 217 in the 18-month analysis. No dose escalation occurred with ETN over 12 and 18 months versus 38% and 32% for IFX (p<0.001) and 2% and 2% for ADA (p=0.199, p=0.218). Over 18 months, dose escalation and/or DMARD and/or glucocorticoid intensification was less frequent among ETN (16%) versus IFX (44%, p=0.005) and ADA (34%, p=0.004). By 18 months, 22% of patients initiating ADA had switched to another biologic compared with 6% of ETN patients (p=0.001).Patients initiating ETN had lower total (drug and drug-related) costs over 12 and 18 months compared to IFX, and no difference compared to ADA when adjusted for potential confounders. Patients with dose escalation had higher costs compared to those with no dose escalation.

Conclusion: Physicians were more likely to escalate the dose of IFX, but optimize co-therapy with ADA and ETN. ETN patients had no dose escalation and were less likely to have DMARD and/or glucocorticoid intensification than ADA patients. ETN-treated patients had lower costs compared to IFX patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Rheumatology Journal
Open Rheumatology Journal Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: ENTHAM Open publishes a number of peer-reviewed, open access journals. These free-to-view online journals cover all major disciplines of science, medicine, technology and social sciences. BENTHAM Open provides researchers a platform to rapidly publish their research in a good-quality peer-reviewed journal. All peer-reviewed accepted submissions meeting high research and ethical standards are published with free access to all.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Features, Socio-cultural Characteristics, Sleep Patterns, and Depression in Fibromyalgia Patients from India: A Cross-Sectional Study The Diagnostic Significance of Serum Sclerostin in Early Detection of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Syrian Patients Clinical Characteristics of Systemic Sclerosis-associated Myopathy Patients Comparing Different Subgroups of Inflammatory Myopathies Association of Interleukin-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Gene Polymorphisms with Gnetic Susceptibility of Psoriatic Arthritis in Kuwaiti Arab Patients The Etiopathogenesis and Genetic Factors in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: A Review Article
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1