有或没有乳头肌逼近的限制性二尖瓣环成形术治疗功能性二尖瓣反流。

Q3 Medicine Journal of Heart Valve Disease Pub Date : 2017-07-01
Yusuke Misumi, Takafumi Masai, Koichi Toda, Teruya Nakamura, Shigeru Miyagawa, Yasushi Yoshikawa, Satsuki Fukushima, Shunsuke Saito, Keitaro Domae, Satoshi Kainuma, Takayoshi Ueno, Toru Kuratani, Takashi Daimon, Yoshiki Sawa
{"title":"有或没有乳头肌逼近的限制性二尖瓣环成形术治疗功能性二尖瓣反流。","authors":"Yusuke Misumi,&nbsp;Takafumi Masai,&nbsp;Koichi Toda,&nbsp;Teruya Nakamura,&nbsp;Shigeru Miyagawa,&nbsp;Yasushi Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Satsuki Fukushima,&nbsp;Shunsuke Saito,&nbsp;Keitaro Domae,&nbsp;Satoshi Kainuma,&nbsp;Takayoshi Ueno,&nbsp;Toru Kuratani,&nbsp;Takashi Daimon,&nbsp;Yoshiki Sawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim of the study: </strong>The impact of adding papillary muscle approximation (PMA) to restrictive mitral annuloplasty (RMA) on postoperative left ventricular (LV) function is unknown. Changes in LV function parameters and clinical outcome were evaluated following RMA with and without PMA in patients with clinically relevant functional mitral regurgitation (FMR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 176 patients with advanced cardiomyopathy underwent RMA either with (n = 59) or without (n = 117) PMA. Propensity score analysis was used to adjust for group differences in several baseline characteristics, such as age, gender and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (C-statistic = 0.80, goodness-of-fit value = 0.58).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serial echocardiography in 30 propensity score-matched pairs demonstrated decreases in LV end-systolic dimension (RMA alone: 57 ± 9 mm at baseline versus 54 ±11 mm at one month versus 56 ± 13 mm at latest examination; RMA + PMA: 56 ± 8 mm versus 53 ± 9 mm versus 48 ± 11 mm, respectively) and improvement in LVEF (RMA alone: 28 ± 8% versus 28 ± 11% versus 29 ± 10%; RMA + PMA: 30 ± 8% versus 30 ± 9% versus 36 ± 13%, respectively) in both groups. Greater degrees of changes in value were noted for patients receiving RMA + PMA (group effect p <0.05 for both). The two-year survival of both groups was similar (73 ± 8% versus 77 ± 23%, p = 0.7), but the RMA + PMA group showed a trend towards a greater freedom from composite events, defined as mortality and/or unscheduled heart failure re-admission (48 ± 9% versus 63 ± 9%, p = 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RMA + PMA induced greater long-term effects on unloading of the left ventricle and improvements in LV systolic function than did RMA alone. PMA may be a useful adjunct repair in combination with RMA, although its clinical benefits remain to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":50184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heart Valve Disease","volume":"26 4","pages":"447-455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restrictive Mitral Annuloplasty With or Without Papillary Muscle Approximation for Functional Mitral Regurgitation.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Misumi,&nbsp;Takafumi Masai,&nbsp;Koichi Toda,&nbsp;Teruya Nakamura,&nbsp;Shigeru Miyagawa,&nbsp;Yasushi Yoshikawa,&nbsp;Satsuki Fukushima,&nbsp;Shunsuke Saito,&nbsp;Keitaro Domae,&nbsp;Satoshi Kainuma,&nbsp;Takayoshi Ueno,&nbsp;Toru Kuratani,&nbsp;Takashi Daimon,&nbsp;Yoshiki Sawa\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim of the study: </strong>The impact of adding papillary muscle approximation (PMA) to restrictive mitral annuloplasty (RMA) on postoperative left ventricular (LV) function is unknown. Changes in LV function parameters and clinical outcome were evaluated following RMA with and without PMA in patients with clinically relevant functional mitral regurgitation (FMR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 176 patients with advanced cardiomyopathy underwent RMA either with (n = 59) or without (n = 117) PMA. Propensity score analysis was used to adjust for group differences in several baseline characteristics, such as age, gender and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (C-statistic = 0.80, goodness-of-fit value = 0.58).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serial echocardiography in 30 propensity score-matched pairs demonstrated decreases in LV end-systolic dimension (RMA alone: 57 ± 9 mm at baseline versus 54 ±11 mm at one month versus 56 ± 13 mm at latest examination; RMA + PMA: 56 ± 8 mm versus 53 ± 9 mm versus 48 ± 11 mm, respectively) and improvement in LVEF (RMA alone: 28 ± 8% versus 28 ± 11% versus 29 ± 10%; RMA + PMA: 30 ± 8% versus 30 ± 9% versus 36 ± 13%, respectively) in both groups. Greater degrees of changes in value were noted for patients receiving RMA + PMA (group effect p <0.05 for both). The two-year survival of both groups was similar (73 ± 8% versus 77 ± 23%, p = 0.7), but the RMA + PMA group showed a trend towards a greater freedom from composite events, defined as mortality and/or unscheduled heart failure re-admission (48 ± 9% versus 63 ± 9%, p = 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RMA + PMA induced greater long-term effects on unloading of the left ventricle and improvements in LV systolic function than did RMA alone. PMA may be a useful adjunct repair in combination with RMA, although its clinical benefits remain to be determined.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heart Valve Disease\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"447-455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heart Valve Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heart Valve Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景和目的:在限制性二尖瓣成形术(RMA)中加入乳头状肌近似术(PMA)对术后左心室(LV)功能的影响尚不清楚。对伴有临床上相关的功能性二尖瓣反流(FMR)的患者进行有PMA和无PMA的RMA后左室功能参数和临床结果的变化进行评估。方法:共有176例晚期心肌病患者接受了RMA治疗,其中有PMA (n = 59)或没有PMA (n = 117)。使用倾向评分分析来调整几个基线特征的组差异,如年龄、性别和左室射血分数(LVEF) (C-statistic = 0.80,拟合优度值= 0.58)。结果:30对倾向评分匹配的连续超声心动图显示左室收缩末期尺寸减小(仅RMA:基线时57±9 mm, 1个月时54±11 mm,最近一次检查时56±13 mm;RMA + PMA:分别为56±8 mm和53±9 mm和48±11 mm)和LVEF的改善(RMA单独:28±8%对28±11%对29±10%;RMA + PMA:分别为30±8%和30±9%和36±13%)。结论:与单独RMA相比,RMA + PMA对左心室卸荷和左室收缩功能的改善有更大的长期影响。PMA可能是一种有用的辅助修复联合RMA,尽管其临床效益仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Restrictive Mitral Annuloplasty With or Without Papillary Muscle Approximation for Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

Background and aim of the study: The impact of adding papillary muscle approximation (PMA) to restrictive mitral annuloplasty (RMA) on postoperative left ventricular (LV) function is unknown. Changes in LV function parameters and clinical outcome were evaluated following RMA with and without PMA in patients with clinically relevant functional mitral regurgitation (FMR).

Methods: A total of 176 patients with advanced cardiomyopathy underwent RMA either with (n = 59) or without (n = 117) PMA. Propensity score analysis was used to adjust for group differences in several baseline characteristics, such as age, gender and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (C-statistic = 0.80, goodness-of-fit value = 0.58).

Results: Serial echocardiography in 30 propensity score-matched pairs demonstrated decreases in LV end-systolic dimension (RMA alone: 57 ± 9 mm at baseline versus 54 ±11 mm at one month versus 56 ± 13 mm at latest examination; RMA + PMA: 56 ± 8 mm versus 53 ± 9 mm versus 48 ± 11 mm, respectively) and improvement in LVEF (RMA alone: 28 ± 8% versus 28 ± 11% versus 29 ± 10%; RMA + PMA: 30 ± 8% versus 30 ± 9% versus 36 ± 13%, respectively) in both groups. Greater degrees of changes in value were noted for patients receiving RMA + PMA (group effect p <0.05 for both). The two-year survival of both groups was similar (73 ± 8% versus 77 ± 23%, p = 0.7), but the RMA + PMA group showed a trend towards a greater freedom from composite events, defined as mortality and/or unscheduled heart failure re-admission (48 ± 9% versus 63 ± 9%, p = 0.1).

Conclusions: RMA + PMA induced greater long-term effects on unloading of the left ventricle and improvements in LV systolic function than did RMA alone. PMA may be a useful adjunct repair in combination with RMA, although its clinical benefits remain to be determined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Heart Valve Disease
Journal of Heart Valve Disease 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Heart Valve Disease (ISSN 0966-8519) is the official journal of The Society for Heart Valve Disease. It is indexed/abstracted by Index Medicus, Medline, Medlar, PubMed, Science Citation Index, Scisearch, Research Alert, Biomedical Products, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine. It is issued bi-monthly in one indexed volume by ICR Publishers Ltd., Crispin House, 12A South Approach, Moor Park, Northwood HA6 2ET, United Kingdom. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI standard Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
期刊最新文献
ABO Blood Group: A Risk Factor for a Cardiovascular Disease in Adults in Morocco Anti-Hypertensive Medication in Geriatric Population with HFpEF Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients with STEMI in Croatia and Kosovo Radiofrequency Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias on Bioprosthetic Valve, a Never Found Case Before An Interesting Case of Heart Failure in a Patient with Bicuspid Aortic Valve - Unveiling the Diagnosis of Amyloidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1