培训对新手和有经验的研究协调员的影响。

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Qualitative Report Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-12-03
Linda S Behar-Horenstein, JoNell Efantis Potter, Alena Prikhidko, Stephanie Swords, Stephen Sonstein, H Robert Kolb
{"title":"培训对新手和有经验的研究协调员的影响。","authors":"Linda S Behar-Horenstein,&nbsp;JoNell Efantis Potter,&nbsp;Alena Prikhidko,&nbsp;Stephanie Swords,&nbsp;Stephen Sonstein,&nbsp;H Robert Kolb","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Competency-based training and professional development is critical to the clinical research enterprise. Understanding research coordinators' perspectives is important for establishing a common core curriculum. The purpose of this study was to describe participants' perspectives regarding the impact of online and classroom training sessions. 27 participants among three institutions, completed a two-day classroom training session. 10 novice and seven experienced research coordinators participated in focus group interviews. Grounded theory revealed similarities in novice and experienced coordinator themes including Identifying Preferences for Instruction and Changing Self Perceptions. Differences, seen in experienced participants, focused on personal change, in the theme of Re-Assessing Skills. Infrastructure and cultural issues were evident in their theme, Promoting Leadership and Advocacy. Novice participants recommended ways to improve training via their theme of Making Programmatic Improvements. Participants reported a clear preference for classroom learning. Training played an influential role in changing participants' self-perceptions by validating their experiences. The findings provided guidance for developing a standardized curriculum. Training must be carefully tailored to the needs of participants while considering audience needs based on work experience, how technology can be used and offering content that is most urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51387,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/e3/nihms930239.PMC5752151.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training Impact on Novice and Experienced Research Coordinators.\",\"authors\":\"Linda S Behar-Horenstein,&nbsp;JoNell Efantis Potter,&nbsp;Alena Prikhidko,&nbsp;Stephanie Swords,&nbsp;Stephen Sonstein,&nbsp;H Robert Kolb\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Competency-based training and professional development is critical to the clinical research enterprise. Understanding research coordinators' perspectives is important for establishing a common core curriculum. The purpose of this study was to describe participants' perspectives regarding the impact of online and classroom training sessions. 27 participants among three institutions, completed a two-day classroom training session. 10 novice and seven experienced research coordinators participated in focus group interviews. Grounded theory revealed similarities in novice and experienced coordinator themes including Identifying Preferences for Instruction and Changing Self Perceptions. Differences, seen in experienced participants, focused on personal change, in the theme of Re-Assessing Skills. Infrastructure and cultural issues were evident in their theme, Promoting Leadership and Advocacy. Novice participants recommended ways to improve training via their theme of Making Programmatic Improvements. Participants reported a clear preference for classroom learning. Training played an influential role in changing participants' self-perceptions by validating their experiences. The findings provided guidance for developing a standardized curriculum. Training must be carefully tailored to the needs of participants while considering audience needs based on work experience, how technology can be used and offering content that is most urgently needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Report\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/e3/nihms930239.PMC5752151.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于能力的培训和专业发展对临床研究企业至关重要。了解研究协调员的观点对于建立共同的核心课程很重要。本研究的目的是描述参与者对在线和课堂培训课程影响的看法。来自三个机构的27名参与者完成了为期两天的课堂培训。10名新手和7名经验丰富的研究协调员参加了焦点小组访谈。扎根理论揭示了新手和经验丰富的协调员在识别教学偏好和改变自我感知等主题上的相似性。在经验丰富的参与者中,差异集中在个人变化上,在重新评估技能的主题上。基础设施和文化问题在其主题“促进领导和宣传”中得到了明显体现。新参加者以“有计划的改进”为主题,提出改善培训的方法。参与者报告了对课堂学习的明显偏好。培训通过验证参与者的经验,在改变他们的自我认知方面发挥了重要作用。调查结果为制定标准化课程提供了指导。培训必须根据参与者的需求精心定制,同时根据工作经验考虑受众的需求,如何使用技术并提供最迫切需要的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Training Impact on Novice and Experienced Research Coordinators.

Competency-based training and professional development is critical to the clinical research enterprise. Understanding research coordinators' perspectives is important for establishing a common core curriculum. The purpose of this study was to describe participants' perspectives regarding the impact of online and classroom training sessions. 27 participants among three institutions, completed a two-day classroom training session. 10 novice and seven experienced research coordinators participated in focus group interviews. Grounded theory revealed similarities in novice and experienced coordinator themes including Identifying Preferences for Instruction and Changing Self Perceptions. Differences, seen in experienced participants, focused on personal change, in the theme of Re-Assessing Skills. Infrastructure and cultural issues were evident in their theme, Promoting Leadership and Advocacy. Novice participants recommended ways to improve training via their theme of Making Programmatic Improvements. Participants reported a clear preference for classroom learning. Training played an influential role in changing participants' self-perceptions by validating their experiences. The findings provided guidance for developing a standardized curriculum. Training must be carefully tailored to the needs of participants while considering audience needs based on work experience, how technology can be used and offering content that is most urgently needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Report
Qualitative Report SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
148
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
"We Live on an Island": Perspectives on Rural Family Caregivers for Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in the United States. Managing Student Suicidality on Campus: Perspectives from Diverse Student Affairs Staff. Access to Eye Care Before and After Vision Loss: A Qualitative Study Investigating Eye Care Among Persons Who Have Become Blind. Medication Exposure Patterns in Primary Care Patients Prescribed Pharmacogenetically Actionable Opioids. Medication Exposure Patterns in Primary Care Patients Prescribed Pharmacogenetically Actionable Opioids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1