Rachel E Zigler, Jeffrey F Peipert, Qiuhong Zhao, Ragini Maddipati, Colleen McNicholas
{"title":"住院医师妇产科培训项目中长效可逆避孕的使用情况。","authors":"Rachel E Zigler, Jeffrey F Peipert, Qiuhong Zhao, Ragini Maddipati, Colleen McNicholas","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S126771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of the study was to estimate the personal usage of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) among obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents in the United States and compare usage between programs with and without a Ryan Residency Training Program (Ryan Program), an educational program implemented to enhance resident training in family planning.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a web-based, cross-sectional survey to explore contraceptive use among Ob/Gyn residents between November and December 2014. Thirty-two Ob/Gyn programs were invited to participate, and 24 programs (75%) agreed to participate. We divided respondents into two groups based on whether or not their program had a Ryan Program. We excluded male residents without a current female partner as well as residents who were currently pregnant or trying to conceive. We evaluated predictors of LARC use using bivariate analysis and multivariable Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 638 residents surveyed, 384 (60.2%) responded to our survey and 351 were eligible for analysis. Of those analyzed, 49.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.1%, 54.5%) reported current LARC use: 70.0% of residents in Ryan Programs compared to 26.8% in non-Ryan Programs (RR<sub>adj</sub> 2.14, 95% CI 1.63-2.80). Residents reporting a religious affiliation were less likely to use LARC than those who described themselves as non-religious (RR<sub>adj</sub> 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.92). Of residents reporting LARC use, 91% were using the levonorgestrel intrauterine device.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LARC use in this population of women's health specialists is substantially higher than in the general population (49% vs. 12%). Ob/Gyn residents in programs affiliated with the Ryan Program were more likely to use LARC.</p>","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":"8 ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJC.S126771","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-acting reversible contraception use among residents in obstetrics/gynecology training programs.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel E Zigler, Jeffrey F Peipert, Qiuhong Zhao, Ragini Maddipati, Colleen McNicholas\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OAJC.S126771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of the study was to estimate the personal usage of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) among obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents in the United States and compare usage between programs with and without a Ryan Residency Training Program (Ryan Program), an educational program implemented to enhance resident training in family planning.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a web-based, cross-sectional survey to explore contraceptive use among Ob/Gyn residents between November and December 2014. Thirty-two Ob/Gyn programs were invited to participate, and 24 programs (75%) agreed to participate. We divided respondents into two groups based on whether or not their program had a Ryan Program. We excluded male residents without a current female partner as well as residents who were currently pregnant or trying to conceive. We evaluated predictors of LARC use using bivariate analysis and multivariable Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 638 residents surveyed, 384 (60.2%) responded to our survey and 351 were eligible for analysis. Of those analyzed, 49.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.1%, 54.5%) reported current LARC use: 70.0% of residents in Ryan Programs compared to 26.8% in non-Ryan Programs (RR<sub>adj</sub> 2.14, 95% CI 1.63-2.80). Residents reporting a religious affiliation were less likely to use LARC than those who described themselves as non-religious (RR<sub>adj</sub> 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.92). Of residents reporting LARC use, 91% were using the levonorgestrel intrauterine device.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LARC use in this population of women's health specialists is substantially higher than in the general population (49% vs. 12%). Ob/Gyn residents in programs affiliated with the Ryan Program were more likely to use LARC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open access journal of contraception\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJC.S126771\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open access journal of contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S126771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S126771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
背景:本研究的目的是估计美国妇产科(Ob/Gyn)住院医师中长效可逆避孕(LARC)的个人使用情况,并比较有和没有瑞安住院医师培训计划(Ryan Program)的项目的使用情况。瑞安住院医师培训计划是一项旨在加强住院医师计划生育培训的教育项目。材料和方法:我们进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查,以探讨2014年11月至12月期间妇产科住院医师的避孕使用情况。邀请32个妇产科项目参与,其中24个项目(75%)同意参与。我们将受访者分为两组基于他们的节目是否有瑞安计划。我们排除了目前没有女性伴侣的男性居民以及目前怀孕或试图怀孕的居民。我们使用双变量分析和多变量泊松回归评估LARC的预测因子。结果:在接受调查的638名居民中,384人(60.2%)回复了我们的调查,351人符合分析条件。在这些分析中,49.3%(95%置信区间[CI]: 44.1%, 54.5%)报告了目前的LARC使用情况:瑞安计划中70.0%的居民使用LARC,而非瑞安计划中的26.8% (RRadj 2.14, 95% CI 1.63-2.80)。有宗教信仰的居民比无宗教信仰的居民更不可能使用LARC (RRadj 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.92)。在报告使用LARC的居民中,91%使用左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器。结论:该人群中女性健康专家使用LARC的比例明显高于普通人群(49%对12%)。瑞安项目附属项目的妇产科住院医师更有可能使用LARC。
Long-acting reversible contraception use among residents in obstetrics/gynecology training programs.
Background: The objective of the study was to estimate the personal usage of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) among obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents in the United States and compare usage between programs with and without a Ryan Residency Training Program (Ryan Program), an educational program implemented to enhance resident training in family planning.
Materials and methods: We performed a web-based, cross-sectional survey to explore contraceptive use among Ob/Gyn residents between November and December 2014. Thirty-two Ob/Gyn programs were invited to participate, and 24 programs (75%) agreed to participate. We divided respondents into two groups based on whether or not their program had a Ryan Program. We excluded male residents without a current female partner as well as residents who were currently pregnant or trying to conceive. We evaluated predictors of LARC use using bivariate analysis and multivariable Poisson regression.
Results: Of the 638 residents surveyed, 384 (60.2%) responded to our survey and 351 were eligible for analysis. Of those analyzed, 49.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.1%, 54.5%) reported current LARC use: 70.0% of residents in Ryan Programs compared to 26.8% in non-Ryan Programs (RRadj 2.14, 95% CI 1.63-2.80). Residents reporting a religious affiliation were less likely to use LARC than those who described themselves as non-religious (RRadj 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.92). Of residents reporting LARC use, 91% were using the levonorgestrel intrauterine device.
Conclusion: LARC use in this population of women's health specialists is substantially higher than in the general population (49% vs. 12%). Ob/Gyn residents in programs affiliated with the Ryan Program were more likely to use LARC.