从人群水平的证据理解最佳氟化物摄入量。

Q1 Medicine Advances in Dental Research Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI:10.1177/0022034517750592
A J Spencer, L G Do, U Mueller, J Baines, M Foley, M A Peres
{"title":"从人群水平的证据理解最佳氟化物摄入量。","authors":"A J Spencer,&nbsp;L G Do,&nbsp;U Mueller,&nbsp;J Baines,&nbsp;M Foley,&nbsp;M A Peres","doi":"10.1177/0022034517750592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy on fluoride intake involves balancing caries against dental fluorosis in populations. The origin of this balance lies with Dean's research on fluoride concentration in water supplies, caries, and fluorosis. Dean identified cut points in the Index of Dental Fluorosis of 0.4 and 0.6 as critical. These equate to 1.3 and 1.6 mg fluoride (F)/L. However, 1.0 mg F/L, initially called a permissible level, was adopted for fluoridation programs. McClure, in 1943, derived an \"optimum\" fluoride intake based on this permissible concentration. It was not until 1944 that Dean referred to this concentration as the \"optimal\" concentration. These were critical steps that have informed health authorities through to today. Several countries have derived toxicological estimates of an adequate and an upper level of intake of fluoride as an important nutrient. The US Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1997 estimated an Adequate Intake (AI) of 0.05 mg F/kg bodyweight (bw)/d and a Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) of 0.10 mg F/kg bw/d. These have been widely promulgated. However, a conundrum has existed with estimates of actual fluoride intake that exceed the UL without the expected adverse fluorosis effects being observed. Both the AI and UL need review. Fluoride intake at an individual level should be interpreted to inform more nuanced guidelines for individual behavior. An \"optimum\" intake should be based on community perceptions of caries and fluorosis, while the ultimate test for fluoride intake is monitoring caries and fluorosis in populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7300,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dental Research","volume":"29 2","pages":"144-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0022034517750592","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Optimum Fluoride Intake from Population-Level Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"A J Spencer,&nbsp;L G Do,&nbsp;U Mueller,&nbsp;J Baines,&nbsp;M Foley,&nbsp;M A Peres\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0022034517750592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Policy on fluoride intake involves balancing caries against dental fluorosis in populations. The origin of this balance lies with Dean's research on fluoride concentration in water supplies, caries, and fluorosis. Dean identified cut points in the Index of Dental Fluorosis of 0.4 and 0.6 as critical. These equate to 1.3 and 1.6 mg fluoride (F)/L. However, 1.0 mg F/L, initially called a permissible level, was adopted for fluoridation programs. McClure, in 1943, derived an \\\"optimum\\\" fluoride intake based on this permissible concentration. It was not until 1944 that Dean referred to this concentration as the \\\"optimal\\\" concentration. These were critical steps that have informed health authorities through to today. Several countries have derived toxicological estimates of an adequate and an upper level of intake of fluoride as an important nutrient. The US Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1997 estimated an Adequate Intake (AI) of 0.05 mg F/kg bodyweight (bw)/d and a Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) of 0.10 mg F/kg bw/d. These have been widely promulgated. However, a conundrum has existed with estimates of actual fluoride intake that exceed the UL without the expected adverse fluorosis effects being observed. Both the AI and UL need review. Fluoride intake at an individual level should be interpreted to inform more nuanced guidelines for individual behavior. An \\\"optimum\\\" intake should be based on community perceptions of caries and fluorosis, while the ultimate test for fluoride intake is monitoring caries and fluorosis in populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"144-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0022034517750592\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517750592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517750592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

关于氟化物摄入的政策包括在人群中平衡龋齿和氟斑牙。这种平衡源于Dean对供水中氟化物浓度、龋齿和氟中毒的研究。迪恩认为氟斑牙指数的临界值为0.4和0.6。这相当于1.3和1.6毫克氟(F)/升。然而,最初被称为允许水平的1.0 mg F/L被氟化方案所采用。麦克卢尔在1943年根据这一允许浓度得出了“最佳”氟化物摄入量。直到1944年,迪安才把这个浓度称为“最佳”浓度。这些关键步骤至今仍为卫生当局提供了信息。一些国家已经得出了作为一种重要营养物质的适当摄入量和较高摄入量的毒理学估计。美国医学研究所(IOM)在1997年估计,适当摄入量(AI)为0.05 mg F/kg体重(bw)/d,可耐受最高摄入量(UL)为0.10 mg F/kg体重/d。这些都被广为传播。然而,存在一个难题,即对实际氟化物摄入量的估计超过了限量,而没有观察到预期的不良氟中毒效应。AI和UL都需要审查。个人层面的氟化物摄入量应该被解释为为个人行为提供更细致入微的指导。“最佳”摄入量应以社区对龋齿和氟中毒的认识为基础,而对氟化物摄入量的最终检验是监测人群中的龋齿和氟中毒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding Optimum Fluoride Intake from Population-Level Evidence.

Policy on fluoride intake involves balancing caries against dental fluorosis in populations. The origin of this balance lies with Dean's research on fluoride concentration in water supplies, caries, and fluorosis. Dean identified cut points in the Index of Dental Fluorosis of 0.4 and 0.6 as critical. These equate to 1.3 and 1.6 mg fluoride (F)/L. However, 1.0 mg F/L, initially called a permissible level, was adopted for fluoridation programs. McClure, in 1943, derived an "optimum" fluoride intake based on this permissible concentration. It was not until 1944 that Dean referred to this concentration as the "optimal" concentration. These were critical steps that have informed health authorities through to today. Several countries have derived toxicological estimates of an adequate and an upper level of intake of fluoride as an important nutrient. The US Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1997 estimated an Adequate Intake (AI) of 0.05 mg F/kg bodyweight (bw)/d and a Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) of 0.10 mg F/kg bw/d. These have been widely promulgated. However, a conundrum has existed with estimates of actual fluoride intake that exceed the UL without the expected adverse fluorosis effects being observed. Both the AI and UL need review. Fluoride intake at an individual level should be interpreted to inform more nuanced guidelines for individual behavior. An "optimum" intake should be based on community perceptions of caries and fluorosis, while the ultimate test for fluoride intake is monitoring caries and fluorosis in populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Dental Research
Advances in Dental Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women in Dental Clinical and Translational Research. Geroscience: Aging and Oral Health Research. Commentary: Challenges and Opportunities for Women in Dental Research Then and Now—A Look Inside the Lives of 11 Women Presidents of the IADR Women Recipients of IADR Distinguished Scientist Awards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1