{"title":"种植研究的日益突出:牙周病期刊上100篇被引用最多的文章的时间趋势分析。","authors":"Ho-Sheng Chiang, Ren-Yeong Huang, Pei-Wei Weng, Lian-Ping Mau, Chi-Chun Su, Yi-Wen Cathy Tsai, Yu-Chiao Wu, Chi-Hsiang Chung, Yi-Shing Shieh, Wan-Chien Cheng","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify 100 top-cited articles published in periodontal journals and analyse the research trends by using citation analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>100 top-cited articles published in periodontal journals were retrieved by searching the database of the ISI Web of Science and Journal Citation reports. For each article, the following principal bibliometric parameters: authorship, geographic and institute origin, manuscript type, study design, scope of study, and citation count of each time period were analysed from 1965 to 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The identified 100 top-cited articles were retrieved from five periodontal journals and citation counts were recorded between 262 and 1,693 times. For the institute of origin, the most productive institute, in terms of the number of 100 top-cited articles published, was the University of Gothenburg (Sweden) (n = 19), followed by the Forsyth Dental Center (USA) (n = 15). Most manuscripts were original research (n = 74), and the inflammatory periodontal disease (n = 59) was the most frequent topic studied. Interestingly, the trend of increase average citation reached significance for implantology (β = 26.75, P = 0.003) and systemic interactions (β = 29.83, P = 0.005), but not for inflammatory disease (β = -10.30, P = 0.248) and tissue regeneration (β = 9.04, P = 0.081). By using multivariable linear regression in a generalised linear model, suitable published journal (Journal of Clinical Periodontology), geographic regions (Europe), more intense international collaboration, adequate manuscript type (review article) and study design (systematic review) could be attributed to escalating average citation counts in implantology (all P < 0.05). However, for systemic interactions, only geographic region and study design were significantly associated with the increasing citation trend.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These principal bibliometric characteristics revealed escalated trends in average citation count in implantology throughout time.</p>","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"11 1","pages":"97-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing prominence of implantology research: a chronological trend analysis of 100 top-cited articles in periodontal journals.\",\"authors\":\"Ho-Sheng Chiang, Ren-Yeong Huang, Pei-Wei Weng, Lian-Ping Mau, Chi-Chun Su, Yi-Wen Cathy Tsai, Yu-Chiao Wu, Chi-Hsiang Chung, Yi-Shing Shieh, Wan-Chien Cheng\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify 100 top-cited articles published in periodontal journals and analyse the research trends by using citation analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>100 top-cited articles published in periodontal journals were retrieved by searching the database of the ISI Web of Science and Journal Citation reports. For each article, the following principal bibliometric parameters: authorship, geographic and institute origin, manuscript type, study design, scope of study, and citation count of each time period were analysed from 1965 to 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The identified 100 top-cited articles were retrieved from five periodontal journals and citation counts were recorded between 262 and 1,693 times. For the institute of origin, the most productive institute, in terms of the number of 100 top-cited articles published, was the University of Gothenburg (Sweden) (n = 19), followed by the Forsyth Dental Center (USA) (n = 15). Most manuscripts were original research (n = 74), and the inflammatory periodontal disease (n = 59) was the most frequent topic studied. Interestingly, the trend of increase average citation reached significance for implantology (β = 26.75, P = 0.003) and systemic interactions (β = 29.83, P = 0.005), but not for inflammatory disease (β = -10.30, P = 0.248) and tissue regeneration (β = 9.04, P = 0.081). By using multivariable linear regression in a generalised linear model, suitable published journal (Journal of Clinical Periodontology), geographic regions (Europe), more intense international collaboration, adequate manuscript type (review article) and study design (systematic review) could be attributed to escalating average citation counts in implantology (all P < 0.05). However, for systemic interactions, only geographic region and study design were significantly associated with the increasing citation trend.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These principal bibliometric characteristics revealed escalated trends in average citation count in implantology throughout time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oral Implantology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"97-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oral Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:利用引文分析法对牙周病期刊发表的100篇被引频次最高的论文进行分析,并对其研究趋势进行分析。材料与方法:通过检索ISI Web of Science和Journal Citation reports数据库,检索100篇被引频次最高的牙周病期刊论文。对于每篇文章,分析了以下主要文献计量参数:作者、地理和研究所来源、手稿类型、研究设计、研究范围和每个时间段的引文计数。结果:检索到的100篇被引频次最高的文献来自5种牙周病期刊,被引频次在262 ~ 1693次之间。就发表的100篇被引文章数量而言,原籍研究所产出最多的是瑞典哥德堡大学(n = 19),其次是美国福赛斯牙科中心(n = 15)。大多数手稿是原创研究(n = 74),炎症性牙周病(n = 59)是最常见的研究主题。有趣的是,平均引用量的增加趋势在种植(β = 26.75, P = 0.003)和系统相互作用(β = 29.83, P = 0.005)方面达到了显著水平,但在炎症性疾病(β = -10.30, P = 0.248)和组织再生(β = 9.04, P = 0.081)方面没有达到显著水平。通过在广义线性模型中使用多变量线性回归,合适的出版期刊(journal of Clinical periodonology)、地理区域(欧洲)、更紧密的国际合作、适当的论文类型(综述文章)和研究设计(系统综述)可归因于种植学平均引用次数的上升(均P < 0.05)。然而,在系统交互作用中,只有地理区域和研究设计与引文增加趋势显著相关。结论:这些主要的文献计量学特征揭示了种植学的平均被引次数随着时间的推移呈上升趋势。
Increasing prominence of implantology research: a chronological trend analysis of 100 top-cited articles in periodontal journals.
Purpose: To identify 100 top-cited articles published in periodontal journals and analyse the research trends by using citation analysis.
Materials and methods: 100 top-cited articles published in periodontal journals were retrieved by searching the database of the ISI Web of Science and Journal Citation reports. For each article, the following principal bibliometric parameters: authorship, geographic and institute origin, manuscript type, study design, scope of study, and citation count of each time period were analysed from 1965 to 2015.
Results: The identified 100 top-cited articles were retrieved from five periodontal journals and citation counts were recorded between 262 and 1,693 times. For the institute of origin, the most productive institute, in terms of the number of 100 top-cited articles published, was the University of Gothenburg (Sweden) (n = 19), followed by the Forsyth Dental Center (USA) (n = 15). Most manuscripts were original research (n = 74), and the inflammatory periodontal disease (n = 59) was the most frequent topic studied. Interestingly, the trend of increase average citation reached significance for implantology (β = 26.75, P = 0.003) and systemic interactions (β = 29.83, P = 0.005), but not for inflammatory disease (β = -10.30, P = 0.248) and tissue regeneration (β = 9.04, P = 0.081). By using multivariable linear regression in a generalised linear model, suitable published journal (Journal of Clinical Periodontology), geographic regions (Europe), more intense international collaboration, adequate manuscript type (review article) and study design (systematic review) could be attributed to escalating average citation counts in implantology (all P < 0.05). However, for systemic interactions, only geographic region and study design were significantly associated with the increasing citation trend.
Conclusions: These principal bibliometric characteristics revealed escalated trends in average citation count in implantology throughout time.