{"title":"[监控摄像头、过去乱扔垃圾、环境、招牌对防止乱扔垃圾的影响]。","authors":"Tomoko Nakamata, Tsuneyuki Abe","doi":"10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two experiments were conducted to assess litter control at a riverside location. Experiment 1 examined the\neffects of a security camera (presence/absence), past littering (presence/absence), and environmental features\n(tussock/plain ground/flowerbed). Two scenes containing combinations of these factors were presented.\nParticipants chose the scene in which they felt it was to easier to litter. Participants also reported their emotional\nresponse to the presence/absence of a security camera and environmental features in scenes with litter. The results\nrevealed that the presence of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, and plain ground inhibited littering.\nLittering in the presence of a security camera facilitated discomfort, anger, and shame, and littering in flowerbeds\ncaused discomfort, anger, shame, and sadness. Using a similar method, Experiment 2 addressed the particular\neffects of a security camera combined with other factors: past littering, environmental features, and signboards\n(no sign/sign with eyes/security camera images). The results demonstrated the effectiveness of a security camera,\nno past littering, flowerbeds, plain ground, signboards presenting eyes, and images from a security camera in\npreventing littering.</p>","PeriodicalId":53680,"journal":{"name":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The effects of security camera, past littering, environment, and signboards on littering prevention].\",\"authors\":\"Tomoko Nakamata, Tsuneyuki Abe\",\"doi\":\"10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two experiments were conducted to assess litter control at a riverside location. Experiment 1 examined the\\neffects of a security camera (presence/absence), past littering (presence/absence), and environmental features\\n(tussock/plain ground/flowerbed). Two scenes containing combinations of these factors were presented.\\nParticipants chose the scene in which they felt it was to easier to litter. Participants also reported their emotional\\nresponse to the presence/absence of a security camera and environmental features in scenes with litter. The results\\nrevealed that the presence of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, and plain ground inhibited littering.\\nLittering in the presence of a security camera facilitated discomfort, anger, and shame, and littering in flowerbeds\\ncaused discomfort, anger, shame, and sadness. Using a similar method, Experiment 2 addressed the particular\\neffects of a security camera combined with other factors: past littering, environmental features, and signboards\\n(no sign/sign with eyes/security camera images). The results demonstrated the effectiveness of a security camera,\\nno past littering, flowerbeds, plain ground, signboards presenting eyes, and images from a security camera in\\npreventing littering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shinrigaku Kenkyu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shinrigaku Kenkyu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
[The effects of security camera, past littering, environment, and signboards on littering prevention].
Two experiments were conducted to assess litter control at a riverside location. Experiment 1 examined the
effects of a security camera (presence/absence), past littering (presence/absence), and environmental features
(tussock/plain ground/flowerbed). Two scenes containing combinations of these factors were presented.
Participants chose the scene in which they felt it was to easier to litter. Participants also reported their emotional
response to the presence/absence of a security camera and environmental features in scenes with litter. The results
revealed that the presence of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, and plain ground inhibited littering.
Littering in the presence of a security camera facilitated discomfort, anger, and shame, and littering in flowerbeds
caused discomfort, anger, shame, and sadness. Using a similar method, Experiment 2 addressed the particular
effects of a security camera combined with other factors: past littering, environmental features, and signboards
(no sign/sign with eyes/security camera images). The results demonstrated the effectiveness of a security camera,
no past littering, flowerbeds, plain ground, signboards presenting eyes, and images from a security camera in
preventing littering.