基于标准的群体社会工作能力清单的因素结构。

Mark J Macgowan, Frank R Dillon, Christine E Spadola
{"title":"基于标准的群体社会工作能力清单的因素结构。","authors":"Mark J Macgowan,&nbsp;Frank R Dillon,&nbsp;Christine E Spadola","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2018.1464996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purposes: </strong>This study extends previous findings on a measure of competencies based on Standards for Social Work Practice with Groups. The Inventory of Competencies in Social Work with Groups (ICSWG) measures confidence in performing the Standards. This study examines the latent structure of the Inventory, while illuminating the underlying structure of the Standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multinational sample of 586 persons completed the ICSWG. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), reliability estimates, standard error of measurement estimates, and a range of validity tests were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA yielded a six-factor solution consisting of core values, mutuality/connectivity, collaboration, and three phases of group development (planning, beginnings/middles, endings). The alphas were .98 for the scale and ranged from .85 to .95 for the subscales. Correlations between the subscales and validators supported evidence of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest key group work domains that should be taught and practiced in social work with groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"15 4","pages":"403-419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2018.1464996","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factor structure of a standards-based inventory of competencies in social work with groups.\",\"authors\":\"Mark J Macgowan,&nbsp;Frank R Dillon,&nbsp;Christine E Spadola\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23761407.2018.1464996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purposes: </strong>This study extends previous findings on a measure of competencies based on Standards for Social Work Practice with Groups. The Inventory of Competencies in Social Work with Groups (ICSWG) measures confidence in performing the Standards. This study examines the latent structure of the Inventory, while illuminating the underlying structure of the Standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multinational sample of 586 persons completed the ICSWG. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), reliability estimates, standard error of measurement estimates, and a range of validity tests were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA yielded a six-factor solution consisting of core values, mutuality/connectivity, collaboration, and three phases of group development (planning, beginnings/middles, endings). The alphas were .98 for the scale and ranged from .85 to .95 for the subscales. Correlations between the subscales and validators supported evidence of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings suggest key group work domains that should be taught and practiced in social work with groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evidence-informed social work\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"403-419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2018.1464996\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evidence-informed social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2018.1464996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/5/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2018.1464996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究扩展了先前基于团体社会工作实践标准的能力测量结果。团体社会工作能力清单(ICSWG)衡量执行标准的信心。本研究考察了清单的潜在结构,同时阐明了标准的潜在结构。方法:586人的跨国样本完成了ICSWG。进行探索性因子分析(EFA)、信度估计、测量估计的标准误差和一系列效度检验。结果:EFA产生了一个六要素解决方案,包括核心价值、相互性/连通性、协作和团队发展的三个阶段(计划、开始/中间、结束)。量表的alpha值为0.98,子量表的alpha值为0.85至0.95。子量表和验证者之间的相关性支持构念效度的证据。讨论:研究结果提出了在社会工作中应该教授和实践的关键小组工作领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factor structure of a standards-based inventory of competencies in social work with groups.

Purposes: This study extends previous findings on a measure of competencies based on Standards for Social Work Practice with Groups. The Inventory of Competencies in Social Work with Groups (ICSWG) measures confidence in performing the Standards. This study examines the latent structure of the Inventory, while illuminating the underlying structure of the Standards.

Methods: A multinational sample of 586 persons completed the ICSWG. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), reliability estimates, standard error of measurement estimates, and a range of validity tests were conducted.

Results: The EFA yielded a six-factor solution consisting of core values, mutuality/connectivity, collaboration, and three phases of group development (planning, beginnings/middles, endings). The alphas were .98 for the scale and ranged from .85 to .95 for the subscales. Correlations between the subscales and validators supported evidence of construct validity.

Discussion: The findings suggest key group work domains that should be taught and practiced in social work with groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Freeing Chinese Abused Women From Stereotype: A Pretest-Posttest Comparison Study on Group Intervention in Refuge Centers. Making and sustaining change from psychotherapy: A mixed methods study. Toward evidence-based anti-human trafficking policy: a rapid review of CSE rehabilitation and evaluation of Indian legislation. Developing your communication skills in social work. The new social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1