肩前路不稳的Hill-Sachs损伤三维模型测量

Alberto Naoki Miyazaki, Luciana Andrade Silva, Pedro Doneux Santos, Guilherme do Val Sella, Leonardo Hideto Nagaya, Sergio Luiz Checchia
{"title":"肩前路不稳的Hill-Sachs损伤三维模型测量","authors":"Alberto Naoki Miyazaki,&nbsp;Luciana Andrade Silva,&nbsp;Pedro Doneux Santos,&nbsp;Guilherme do Val Sella,&nbsp;Leonardo Hideto Nagaya,&nbsp;Sergio Luiz Checchia","doi":"10.1016/j.rboe.2018.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of Hill–Sachs lesion measurement from computed tomography images, with computer software and tridimensional prototype.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three-dimensional models were made from computed tomography images from 14 patients with anterior shoulder instability, using InVesalius 3.0® software. Hill–Sachs lesions were measured with Rhinocerus 5.0® software with pre-determined position. Mid-lateral distance, perpendicular to humeral shaft, cranial-caudal distance, parallel to humeral shaft, and the longitudinal distance of the lesion were measured. Using the Printer-ZP 310 three-dimensional printer, plaster models were made. To measure the Hill–Sachs lesion, a calibrated universal digital caliper was used in the same way as the software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was intra-observer and inter-observer variability for measurement of the same model. Observers did not perform the measurements in a similar way, showing difficulty to use the method (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05). Using the software to measure the mid-lateral distance, as well as in the measurement with the caliper, the model type influenced the measurements for each of the observers, rendering the method invalid (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no reproducibility and repeatability for Hill–Sachs lesion measurement between plaster models and software models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101095,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)","volume":"53 3","pages":"Pages 357-363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.03.008","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hill–Sachs lesion measurement with tridimensional models in anterior shoulder instability\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Naoki Miyazaki,&nbsp;Luciana Andrade Silva,&nbsp;Pedro Doneux Santos,&nbsp;Guilherme do Val Sella,&nbsp;Leonardo Hideto Nagaya,&nbsp;Sergio Luiz Checchia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rboe.2018.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of Hill–Sachs lesion measurement from computed tomography images, with computer software and tridimensional prototype.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three-dimensional models were made from computed tomography images from 14 patients with anterior shoulder instability, using InVesalius 3.0® software. Hill–Sachs lesions were measured with Rhinocerus 5.0® software with pre-determined position. Mid-lateral distance, perpendicular to humeral shaft, cranial-caudal distance, parallel to humeral shaft, and the longitudinal distance of the lesion were measured. Using the Printer-ZP 310 three-dimensional printer, plaster models were made. To measure the Hill–Sachs lesion, a calibrated universal digital caliper was used in the same way as the software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was intra-observer and inter-observer variability for measurement of the same model. Observers did not perform the measurements in a similar way, showing difficulty to use the method (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05). Using the software to measure the mid-lateral distance, as well as in the measurement with the caliper, the model type influenced the measurements for each of the observers, rendering the method invalid (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no reproducibility and repeatability for Hill–Sachs lesion measurement between plaster models and software models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"53 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 357-363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.03.008\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255497118300478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255497118300478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的利用计算机软件和三维模型,评价ct图像对Hill-Sachs病变测量的再现性和可重复性。方法采用InVesalius 3.0®软件对14例前路肩关节不稳患者的计算机断层图像进行三维建模。使用Rhinocerus 5.0®软件测量Hill-Sachs病变,并预先确定位置。测量中外侧距离,垂直于肱骨干,颅尾距离,平行于肱骨干,以及病变的纵向距离。利用printer - zp310三维打印机制作石膏模型。为了测量Hill-Sachs病变,采用与软件相同的方法校准通用数字卡尺。结果同一模型的测量存在观察者内部和观察者之间的变异。观测者没有以类似的方式进行测量,这表明使用该方法很困难(p <0.05)。使用软件测量中侧向距离,以及在用卡尺测量时,模型类型影响了每个观测者的测量结果,导致该方法无效(p <0.05)。结论石膏模型与软件模型间Hill-Sachs损伤测量无重现性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hill–Sachs lesion measurement with tridimensional models in anterior shoulder instability

Objective

To evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of Hill–Sachs lesion measurement from computed tomography images, with computer software and tridimensional prototype.

Methods

Three-dimensional models were made from computed tomography images from 14 patients with anterior shoulder instability, using InVesalius 3.0® software. Hill–Sachs lesions were measured with Rhinocerus 5.0® software with pre-determined position. Mid-lateral distance, perpendicular to humeral shaft, cranial-caudal distance, parallel to humeral shaft, and the longitudinal distance of the lesion were measured. Using the Printer-ZP 310 three-dimensional printer, plaster models were made. To measure the Hill–Sachs lesion, a calibrated universal digital caliper was used in the same way as the software.

Results

There was intra-observer and inter-observer variability for measurement of the same model. Observers did not perform the measurements in a similar way, showing difficulty to use the method (p < 0.05). Using the software to measure the mid-lateral distance, as well as in the measurement with the caliper, the model type influenced the measurements for each of the observers, rendering the method invalid (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

There was no reproducibility and repeatability for Hill–Sachs lesion measurement between plaster models and software models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical treatment of chondral knee defects using a collagen membrane – autologus matrix-induced chondrogenesis Evaluation of the use of tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty Clinical and radiographic outcomes of hip resurfacing arthroplasty after eight years – a retrospective study Effect of surgical treatment on the quality of life in patients with non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head Is there a relationship between the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and bilaterality in patients with coxarthrosis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1