Rui-Feng Guo, Hou-Tian Yan, Rui-Xue Liu, Hong-Chang Li, Yan-Cheng Liu, Zhen-Feng Chen and Hong Liang
{"title":"一种新型铜基恩诺沙星衍生物的结构表征和体外/体内药理学评价","authors":"Rui-Feng Guo, Hou-Tian Yan, Rui-Xue Liu, Hong-Chang Li, Yan-Cheng Liu, Zhen-Feng Chen and Hong Liang","doi":"10.1039/D0MT00155D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Enrofloxacin (EFX) was selected as the medicinal ligand to afford a new copper(<small>II</small>)-based complex, EFX-Cu, which was structurally characterized by spectroscopic analyses including X-ray single crystal diffraction. It was also stable and could retain the coordination state in aqueous solution. The <em>in vitro</em> antibacterial activity of EFX-Cu against a panel of pathogenic bacteria was about the same as that of EFX, except that it was twice as active against <em>E. coli</em>. The <em>in vivo</em> test on mice gave a LD<small><sub>50</sub></small> value of 8148 mg kg<small><sup>?1</sup></small> for EFX-Cu, which was much lower than those for EFX (LD<small><sub>50</sub></small>, 5312 mg kg<small><sup>?1</sup></small>) and its clinically used sodium salt, EFX-Na (LD<small><sub>50</sub></small>, 1421 mg kg<small><sup>?1</sup></small>). In addition, no obvious lesions in the organs of the dead mice were found by histopathological examination. Pharmacokinetic studies on rats suggested similar pharmacokinetics between EFX-Cu and EFX. On the other hand, EFX-Cu showed higher acute toxicity than EFX-Na in zebrafish, which was inconsistent with that in mice. The ROS-related inflammation and anti-inflammatory assay of EFX-Cu, respectively, in normal cells and zebrafish could be ascribed to its ROS-related redox property. Unfortunately, the final <em>in vivo</em> therapeutic assay in the <em>E. coli</em>-infected mouse model indicated that the therapeutic effect of EFX-Cu, mainly in terms of mortality in mice, was found to be lower than that of EFX-Na at the same dosage (800 mg kg<small><sup>?1</sup></small>, continuous gavage), although the contradictory factors between toxicity and antibacterial activity could not be excluded in this trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":89,"journal":{"name":"Metallomics","volume":" 12","pages":" 2145-2160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/D0MT00155D","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural characterization and pharmacological assessment in vitro/in vivo of a new copper(ii)-based derivative of enrofloxacin†\",\"authors\":\"Rui-Feng Guo, Hou-Tian Yan, Rui-Xue Liu, Hong-Chang Li, Yan-Cheng Liu, Zhen-Feng Chen and Hong Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D0MT00155D\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Enrofloxacin (EFX) was selected as the medicinal ligand to afford a new copper(<small>II</small>)-based complex, EFX-Cu, which was structurally characterized by spectroscopic analyses including X-ray single crystal diffraction. It was also stable and could retain the coordination state in aqueous solution. The <em>in vitro</em> antibacterial activity of EFX-Cu against a panel of pathogenic bacteria was about the same as that of EFX, except that it was twice as active against <em>E. coli</em>. The <em>in vivo</em> test on mice gave a LD<small><sub>50</sub></small> value of 8148 mg kg<small><sup>?1</sup></small> for EFX-Cu, which was much lower than those for EFX (LD<small><sub>50</sub></small>, 5312 mg kg<small><sup>?1</sup></small>) and its clinically used sodium salt, EFX-Na (LD<small><sub>50</sub></small>, 1421 mg kg<small><sup>?1</sup></small>). In addition, no obvious lesions in the organs of the dead mice were found by histopathological examination. Pharmacokinetic studies on rats suggested similar pharmacokinetics between EFX-Cu and EFX. On the other hand, EFX-Cu showed higher acute toxicity than EFX-Na in zebrafish, which was inconsistent with that in mice. The ROS-related inflammation and anti-inflammatory assay of EFX-Cu, respectively, in normal cells and zebrafish could be ascribed to its ROS-related redox property. Unfortunately, the final <em>in vivo</em> therapeutic assay in the <em>E. coli</em>-infected mouse model indicated that the therapeutic effect of EFX-Cu, mainly in terms of mortality in mice, was found to be lower than that of EFX-Na at the same dosage (800 mg kg<small><sup>?1</sup></small>, continuous gavage), although the contradictory factors between toxicity and antibacterial activity could not be excluded in this trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metallomics\",\"volume\":\" 12\",\"pages\":\" 2145-2160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/D0MT00155D\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metallomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/mt/d0mt00155d\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metallomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/mt/d0mt00155d","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Structural characterization and pharmacological assessment in vitro/in vivo of a new copper(ii)-based derivative of enrofloxacin†
Enrofloxacin (EFX) was selected as the medicinal ligand to afford a new copper(II)-based complex, EFX-Cu, which was structurally characterized by spectroscopic analyses including X-ray single crystal diffraction. It was also stable and could retain the coordination state in aqueous solution. The in vitro antibacterial activity of EFX-Cu against a panel of pathogenic bacteria was about the same as that of EFX, except that it was twice as active against E. coli. The in vivo test on mice gave a LD50 value of 8148 mg kg?1 for EFX-Cu, which was much lower than those for EFX (LD50, 5312 mg kg?1) and its clinically used sodium salt, EFX-Na (LD50, 1421 mg kg?1). In addition, no obvious lesions in the organs of the dead mice were found by histopathological examination. Pharmacokinetic studies on rats suggested similar pharmacokinetics between EFX-Cu and EFX. On the other hand, EFX-Cu showed higher acute toxicity than EFX-Na in zebrafish, which was inconsistent with that in mice. The ROS-related inflammation and anti-inflammatory assay of EFX-Cu, respectively, in normal cells and zebrafish could be ascribed to its ROS-related redox property. Unfortunately, the final in vivo therapeutic assay in the E. coli-infected mouse model indicated that the therapeutic effect of EFX-Cu, mainly in terms of mortality in mice, was found to be lower than that of EFX-Na at the same dosage (800 mg kg?1, continuous gavage), although the contradictory factors between toxicity and antibacterial activity could not be excluded in this trial.