黎巴嫩乳腺癌患者雌激素受体、孕激素受体和HER2受体状态的免疫组织化学和微阵列基因表达谱的一致性

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2018-05-31 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/8530318
Ghina B Fakhri, Reem S Akel, Maya K Khalil, Deborah A Mukherji, Fouad I Boulos, Arafat H Tfayli
{"title":"黎巴嫩乳腺癌患者雌激素受体、孕激素受体和HER2受体状态的免疫组织化学和微阵列基因表达谱的一致性","authors":"Ghina B Fakhri,&nbsp;Reem S Akel,&nbsp;Maya K Khalil,&nbsp;Deborah A Mukherji,&nbsp;Fouad I Boulos,&nbsp;Arafat H Tfayli","doi":"10.1155/2018/8530318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 is critical when diagnosing invasive breast cancer for optimal treatment. The current evaluation method is via immunohistochemistry (IHC). In this paper, we compared results of ER, PR, and HER2 from microarray gene expression to IHC in 81 fresh breast cancer specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gene expression profiling was performed using the GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix Inc). Immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status was performed using standard methods at a CAP-accredited pathology laboratory. Concordance rates, agreement measures, and kappa scores were calculated for both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For ER, Kappa score was 0.918 (95% CI, 0.77.3-1.000) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%-99.7%). For PR, Kappa score was 0.652 (95% CI, 0.405-0.849) and concordance rate was 86.4% (95% CI, 77%-93%). For HER2, Kappa score was 0.709 (95% CI, 0.428-0.916) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%-99.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results are in line with the available evidence with the concordance rate being the lowest for the progesterone receptor. In general, microarray gene expression and IHC proved to have high concordance rates. Several factors can increase the discordance rate such as differences in sample processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Breast Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/8530318","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in Lebanon.\",\"authors\":\"Ghina B Fakhri,&nbsp;Reem S Akel,&nbsp;Maya K Khalil,&nbsp;Deborah A Mukherji,&nbsp;Fouad I Boulos,&nbsp;Arafat H Tfayli\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/8530318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 is critical when diagnosing invasive breast cancer for optimal treatment. The current evaluation method is via immunohistochemistry (IHC). In this paper, we compared results of ER, PR, and HER2 from microarray gene expression to IHC in 81 fresh breast cancer specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gene expression profiling was performed using the GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix Inc). Immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status was performed using standard methods at a CAP-accredited pathology laboratory. Concordance rates, agreement measures, and kappa scores were calculated for both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For ER, Kappa score was 0.918 (95% CI, 0.77.3-1.000) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%-99.7%). For PR, Kappa score was 0.652 (95% CI, 0.405-0.849) and concordance rate was 86.4% (95% CI, 77%-93%). For HER2, Kappa score was 0.709 (95% CI, 0.428-0.916) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%-99.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results are in line with the available evidence with the concordance rate being the lowest for the progesterone receptor. In general, microarray gene expression and IHC proved to have high concordance rates. Several factors can increase the discordance rate such as differences in sample processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/8530318\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8530318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8530318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

简介:准确评估雌激素和孕激素受体和HER2在诊断浸润性乳腺癌以获得最佳治疗时至关重要。目前的评估方法是通过免疫组织化学(IHC)。在本文中,我们比较了81例新鲜乳腺癌标本中从微阵列基因表达到IHC的ER、PR和HER2的结果。方法:采用GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0阵列(Affymetrix Inc .)进行基因表达谱分析。在cap认可的病理实验室使用标准方法进行雌激素受体、孕激素受体和HER2状态的免疫组织化学染色。计算两种方法的一致性率、一致性测量和kappa评分。结果:ER Kappa评分为0.918 (95% CI, 0.77.3 ~ 1.000),符合率为97.5% (95% CI, 91.4% ~ 99.7%)。PR的Kappa评分为0.652 (95% CI, 0.405 ~ 0.849),一致性率为86.4% (95% CI, 77% ~ 93%)。对于HER2, Kappa评分为0.709 (95% CI, 0.428-0.916),一致性率为97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%-99.7%)。结论:我们的结果与已有证据一致,黄体酮受体的符合率最低。总的来说,微阵列基因表达和免疫组化具有很高的一致性。有几个因素可以增加不一致率,如样品处理的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Concordance between Immunohistochemistry and Microarray Gene Expression Profiling for Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER2 Receptor Statuses in Breast Cancer Patients in Lebanon.

Introduction: Accurate evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 is critical when diagnosing invasive breast cancer for optimal treatment. The current evaluation method is via immunohistochemistry (IHC). In this paper, we compared results of ER, PR, and HER2 from microarray gene expression to IHC in 81 fresh breast cancer specimens.

Methods: Gene expression profiling was performed using the GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix Inc). Immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status was performed using standard methods at a CAP-accredited pathology laboratory. Concordance rates, agreement measures, and kappa scores were calculated for both methods.

Results: For ER, Kappa score was 0.918 (95% CI, 0.77.3-1.000) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%-99.7%). For PR, Kappa score was 0.652 (95% CI, 0.405-0.849) and concordance rate was 86.4% (95% CI, 77%-93%). For HER2, Kappa score was 0.709 (95% CI, 0.428-0.916) and concordance rate was 97.5% (95% CI, 91.4%-99.7%).

Conclusion: Our results are in line with the available evidence with the concordance rate being the lowest for the progesterone receptor. In general, microarray gene expression and IHC proved to have high concordance rates. Several factors can increase the discordance rate such as differences in sample processing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for scientists, clinicians, and health care professionals working in breast cancer research and management. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to molecular pathology, genomics, genetic predisposition, screening and diagnosis, disease markers, drug sensitivity and resistance, as well as novel therapies, with a specific focus on molecular targeted agents and immune therapies.
期刊最新文献
PI3K Mutation Profiles on Exons 9 (E545K and E542K) and 20 (H1047R) in Mexican Patients With HER-2 Overexpressed Breast Cancer and Its Relevance on Clinical-Pathological and Survival Biological Effects. Factors Associated With Uptake of Breast Cancer Screening Among Catholic Nuns in Lake Zone, Tanzania. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Tumor Immunogenicity and Beyond. Assessing Awareness, Attitude, and Practices of Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention Among General Public and Physicians in Pakistan: A Nation With the Highest Breast Cancer Incidence in Asia. Assessment of Tissue Eosinophilic Infiltration in Invasive Mammary Carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1