Luciano Rodrigo Peres, Matheus Silva Teixeira, Caetano Scalizi Júnior, Wolf Akl Filho
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建中股骨隧道定位的影像学评价","authors":"Luciano Rodrigo Peres, Matheus Silva Teixeira, Caetano Scalizi Júnior, Wolf Akl Filho","doi":"10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the inclination and the length of the femoral tunnel in patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) surgery by transtibial and anatomical techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is an analytical observational study in patients with ACL injury that underwent arthroscopic reconstruction through transtibial and anatomical surgical techniques. In the immediate postoperative period, computed tomography (CT) and anteroposterior (AP) view digital radiographs (X-rays) were performed to evaluate the inclination and length of the femoral tunnel.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-two patients were analyzed: 27 underwent anatomical reconstruction and 15, transtibial reconstruction. The inclination angle and tunnel length by the transtibial technique are always greater than by the anatomical technique. The mean inclination angles were 59.75° (53.9–66.1°) in the X-rays and 54.17° (43.5–62.3°) in CT for the transtibial technique, and 42.91° (29.3–57.4°) in the X-rays and 39.10° (23.8–50.6°) in CT for the anatomical technique. Regarding the length of the femoral tunnel, the transtibial technique promotes longer tunnels: mean 55.7<!--> <!-->mm (40.0–70.2<!--> <!-->mm) in the transtibial and 35.5<!--> <!-->mm (24.5–47<!--> <!-->mm) in the anatomical technique. No statistically significant correlation was observed between the length and the inclination of the tunnel, regardless of the technique used. Thus, these variables can be considered as independent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The anatomical reconstruction technique presented shorter femoral tunnels and lower angle of inclination than the transtibial technique. The CT showed smaller inclination angle than the X-rays, regardless of the surgical technique.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101095,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)","volume":"53 4","pages":"Pages 397-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.001","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Luciano Rodrigo Peres, Matheus Silva Teixeira, Caetano Scalizi Júnior, Wolf Akl Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the inclination and the length of the femoral tunnel in patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) surgery by transtibial and anatomical techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is an analytical observational study in patients with ACL injury that underwent arthroscopic reconstruction through transtibial and anatomical surgical techniques. In the immediate postoperative period, computed tomography (CT) and anteroposterior (AP) view digital radiographs (X-rays) were performed to evaluate the inclination and length of the femoral tunnel.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-two patients were analyzed: 27 underwent anatomical reconstruction and 15, transtibial reconstruction. The inclination angle and tunnel length by the transtibial technique are always greater than by the anatomical technique. The mean inclination angles were 59.75° (53.9–66.1°) in the X-rays and 54.17° (43.5–62.3°) in CT for the transtibial technique, and 42.91° (29.3–57.4°) in the X-rays and 39.10° (23.8–50.6°) in CT for the anatomical technique. Regarding the length of the femoral tunnel, the transtibial technique promotes longer tunnels: mean 55.7<!--> <!-->mm (40.0–70.2<!--> <!-->mm) in the transtibial and 35.5<!--> <!-->mm (24.5–47<!--> <!-->mm) in the anatomical technique. No statistically significant correlation was observed between the length and the inclination of the tunnel, regardless of the technique used. Thus, these variables can be considered as independent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The anatomical reconstruction technique presented shorter femoral tunnels and lower angle of inclination than the transtibial technique. The CT showed smaller inclination angle than the X-rays, regardless of the surgical technique.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 397-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.001\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255497118300661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255497118300661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
目的探讨经胫骨和解剖技术行前交叉韧带重建术患者股骨隧道的倾斜度和长度。方法对前交叉韧带损伤患者进行经胫骨和解剖手术技术的关节镜重建的分析性观察研究。术后立即行计算机断层扫描(CT)和正位数字x线片(x线)评估股骨隧道的倾斜度和长度。结果42例患者中解剖重建27例,经胫骨重建15例。经胫法的倾斜角度和隧道长度总是大于解剖法。经骨技术x线平均倾角59.75°(53.9 ~ 66.1°),CT平均倾角54.17°(43.5 ~ 62.3°);解剖技术x线平均倾角42.91°(29.3 ~ 57.4°),CT平均倾角39.10°(23.8 ~ 50.6°)。关于股骨隧道的长度,经胫骨技术可延长隧道长度:经胫骨平均55.7 mm (40.0-70.2 mm),解剖技术平均35.5 mm (24.5-47 mm)。无论使用何种技术,隧道的长度和倾斜度之间没有统计学上的显著相关性。因此,这些变量可以被认为是独立的。结论解剖重建技术与经胫骨技术相比,股骨隧道更短,股骨倾斜角度更小。无论手术技术如何,CT显示的倾斜角度都小于x线。
Radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Objective
To evaluate the inclination and the length of the femoral tunnel in patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) surgery by transtibial and anatomical techniques.
Methods
This is an analytical observational study in patients with ACL injury that underwent arthroscopic reconstruction through transtibial and anatomical surgical techniques. In the immediate postoperative period, computed tomography (CT) and anteroposterior (AP) view digital radiographs (X-rays) were performed to evaluate the inclination and length of the femoral tunnel.
Results
Forty-two patients were analyzed: 27 underwent anatomical reconstruction and 15, transtibial reconstruction. The inclination angle and tunnel length by the transtibial technique are always greater than by the anatomical technique. The mean inclination angles were 59.75° (53.9–66.1°) in the X-rays and 54.17° (43.5–62.3°) in CT for the transtibial technique, and 42.91° (29.3–57.4°) in the X-rays and 39.10° (23.8–50.6°) in CT for the anatomical technique. Regarding the length of the femoral tunnel, the transtibial technique promotes longer tunnels: mean 55.7 mm (40.0–70.2 mm) in the transtibial and 35.5 mm (24.5–47 mm) in the anatomical technique. No statistically significant correlation was observed between the length and the inclination of the tunnel, regardless of the technique used. Thus, these variables can be considered as independent.
Conclusion
The anatomical reconstruction technique presented shorter femoral tunnels and lower angle of inclination than the transtibial technique. The CT showed smaller inclination angle than the X-rays, regardless of the surgical technique.