认知评估测试:一种检测轻度认知障碍的简短认知测试的验证。

Q1 Neuroscience International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2018-07-02 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/3280621
Kelly Estrada-Orozco, Kely Bonilla-Vargas, Francy Cruz, Oscar Mancera, Miguel Ruiz, Laura Alvarez, Rodrigo Pardo, Humberto Arboleda
{"title":"认知评估测试:一种检测轻度认知障碍的简短认知测试的验证。","authors":"Kelly Estrada-Orozco,&nbsp;Kely Bonilla-Vargas,&nbsp;Francy Cruz,&nbsp;Oscar Mancera,&nbsp;Miguel Ruiz,&nbsp;Laura Alvarez,&nbsp;Rodrigo Pardo,&nbsp;Humberto Arboleda","doi":"10.1155/2018/3280621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive disorders are a clinical and research challenge; in particular, the mild cognitive disorder (MiCD) requires diagnostic suspicion and tools with adequate performance for its detection. The objective of this study was the validation of a short cognitive test (CATest) for the detection of MiCD in population of 50 years or more.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diagnostic accuracy study was assembled and performed in a prospective cohort. A consecutive sample of 200 Colombian subjects who represented the whole spectrum of the condition of interest allowed us to reach the objective. Validity was determined by concurrent criteria. The cut points were determined by the ROC curves considering the best overall performance and accuracy of the test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CATest was validated to detection of MiCD at a cut-off point of 18. As a result, scores lower than 18 classified the participants as MiCD. At this cut-off point, CATest showed sensitivity of 84.3% (CI 76 to 90.16), specificity of 71.4% (<b>CI</b> 95% 61.8 to 79.43), positive predictive value of 75% ( 95% CI 66.79 to 82.42), and area under curve AUC 0.8518 (standard error SE 0.0265).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CATest has an adequate performance as a short cognitive test for the detection of MiCD. Its performance is superior to MiniMental and similar to Montreal Cognitive test (MoCA) according to the data reported in the literature. The advantages over other tests are the evaluation of all cognitive domains, time of application, and easy interpretation of results. CATest is a free use alternative for MiCD detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13802,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"2018 ","pages":"3280621"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/3280621","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Assessment Test: Validation of a Short Cognitive Test for the Detection of Mild Cognitive Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Kelly Estrada-Orozco,&nbsp;Kely Bonilla-Vargas,&nbsp;Francy Cruz,&nbsp;Oscar Mancera,&nbsp;Miguel Ruiz,&nbsp;Laura Alvarez,&nbsp;Rodrigo Pardo,&nbsp;Humberto Arboleda\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/3280621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive disorders are a clinical and research challenge; in particular, the mild cognitive disorder (MiCD) requires diagnostic suspicion and tools with adequate performance for its detection. The objective of this study was the validation of a short cognitive test (CATest) for the detection of MiCD in population of 50 years or more.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diagnostic accuracy study was assembled and performed in a prospective cohort. A consecutive sample of 200 Colombian subjects who represented the whole spectrum of the condition of interest allowed us to reach the objective. Validity was determined by concurrent criteria. The cut points were determined by the ROC curves considering the best overall performance and accuracy of the test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CATest was validated to detection of MiCD at a cut-off point of 18. As a result, scores lower than 18 classified the participants as MiCD. At this cut-off point, CATest showed sensitivity of 84.3% (CI 76 to 90.16), specificity of 71.4% (<b>CI</b> 95% 61.8 to 79.43), positive predictive value of 75% ( 95% CI 66.79 to 82.42), and area under curve AUC 0.8518 (standard error SE 0.0265).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CATest has an adequate performance as a short cognitive test for the detection of MiCD. Its performance is superior to MiniMental and similar to Montreal Cognitive test (MoCA) according to the data reported in the literature. The advantages over other tests are the evaluation of all cognitive domains, time of application, and easy interpretation of results. CATest is a free use alternative for MiCD detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\"2018 \",\"pages\":\"3280621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/3280621\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3280621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3280621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

引言:认知障碍是一项临床和研究挑战;特别是,轻度认知障碍(MiCD)需要诊断怀疑和具有足够性能的检测工具。本研究的目的是验证一种短认知测试(CATest)在50岁或以上人群中检测MiCD的有效性。方法:在前瞻性队列中进行诊断准确性研究。连续抽样200名哥伦比亚受试者,他们代表了所有感兴趣的条件,使我们能够达到目标。有效性由并发标准确定。切割点由ROC曲线确定,考虑测试的最佳整体性能和准确性。结果:CATest在截断点为18的情况下能够检测到MiCD。因此,得分低于18分的参与者被归类为MiCD。在该截止点,CATest的敏感性为84.3% (CI 76 ~ 90.16),特异性为71.4% (CI 95% 61.8 ~ 79.43),阳性预测值为75% (95% CI 66.79 ~ 82.42),曲线下面积AUC为0.8518(标准误差SE 0.0265)。讨论:CATest作为一种简短的认知测试,在检测MiCD方面有足够的表现。从文献数据来看,其性能优于MiniMental,与Montreal Cognitive test (MoCA)相近。与其他测试相比,其优点是评估所有认知领域,应用时间短,结果易于解释。CATest是一种免费的MiCD检测替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive Assessment Test: Validation of a Short Cognitive Test for the Detection of Mild Cognitive Disorder.

Introduction: Cognitive disorders are a clinical and research challenge; in particular, the mild cognitive disorder (MiCD) requires diagnostic suspicion and tools with adequate performance for its detection. The objective of this study was the validation of a short cognitive test (CATest) for the detection of MiCD in population of 50 years or more.

Methods: A diagnostic accuracy study was assembled and performed in a prospective cohort. A consecutive sample of 200 Colombian subjects who represented the whole spectrum of the condition of interest allowed us to reach the objective. Validity was determined by concurrent criteria. The cut points were determined by the ROC curves considering the best overall performance and accuracy of the test.

Results: CATest was validated to detection of MiCD at a cut-off point of 18. As a result, scores lower than 18 classified the participants as MiCD. At this cut-off point, CATest showed sensitivity of 84.3% (CI 76 to 90.16), specificity of 71.4% (CI 95% 61.8 to 79.43), positive predictive value of 75% ( 95% CI 66.79 to 82.42), and area under curve AUC 0.8518 (standard error SE 0.0265).

Discussion: CATest has an adequate performance as a short cognitive test for the detection of MiCD. Its performance is superior to MiniMental and similar to Montreal Cognitive test (MoCA) according to the data reported in the literature. The advantages over other tests are the evaluation of all cognitive domains, time of application, and easy interpretation of results. CATest is a free use alternative for MiCD detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inflammatory Manifestations Associated With Gut Dysbiosis in Alzheimer's Disease. Advancements and Challenges in Antiamyloid Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Novel Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease: Plasma Neurofilament Light and Cerebrospinal Fluid In Silico Investigation of Novel Compounds as Inhibitors of Acetylcholinesterase Enzyme for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Diseases In Silico Investigation of Novel Compounds as Inhibitors of Acetylcholinesterase Enzyme for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1