短期甲状腺手术:能否在低资源环境下复制?

IF 1.7 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Thyroid Research Pub Date : 2018-08-05 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/4910961
Naval Bansal, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Saroj Kanta Mishra, Kamal Kishore, Anjali Mishra, Gyan Chand, Gaurav Agarwal, Amit Agarwal, Ashok Kumar Verma
{"title":"短期甲状腺手术:能否在低资源环境下复制?","authors":"Naval Bansal,&nbsp;Sanjay Kumar Yadav,&nbsp;Saroj Kanta Mishra,&nbsp;Kamal Kishore,&nbsp;Anjali Mishra,&nbsp;Gyan Chand,&nbsp;Gaurav Agarwal,&nbsp;Amit Agarwal,&nbsp;Ashok Kumar Verma","doi":"10.1155/2018/4910961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The concept of short stay thyroidectomy has been tested and in practice in the developed world; the same has not been replicated in countries with limited resources due to lack of organized healthcare system. So, in this study, we tried to analyze if short stay thyroid surgery can be performed in a cost-effective way in developing countries and also if the endocrine surgical trainee can deliver these services safely.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted prospectively from January 2013 to July 2014, at Department of Endocrine Surgery, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India. Study group included patients undergoing short stay hemithyroidectomy whereas matched patients who qualified for inclusion criteria but did not undergo short stay surgery due to various reasons constituted control group. Outcome in both the groups was compared in terms of complication rates, cost benefit, and patient satisfaction. Subgroup analysis was also done for trainee versus consultant performed short stay thyroid surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 439 patients with surgical thyroid disorders were evaluated at our institute during the study period and out of these 110 patients (58 cases and 52 controls) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Younger patients with low socioeconomic status who were paying out of pocket were found to be more inclined to short stay thyroid surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postanesthetic discharge score (PADS), complication rates, and patients satisfaction; however there was significant reduction (p <0.001) in hospital cost in short stay group. In subgroup analysis, procedure time was more in trainee performed surgeries; however there was no significant difference in terms of mean PADS and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short stay thyroidectomy can provide a better cost-effective alternative to conventional thyroidectomy in patients undergoing thyroid surgery and can be safely performed by endocrine surgical trainees even in a low resource setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":17394,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thyroid Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/4910961","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short Stay Thyroid Surgery: Can We Replicate the Same in Low Resource Setting?\",\"authors\":\"Naval Bansal,&nbsp;Sanjay Kumar Yadav,&nbsp;Saroj Kanta Mishra,&nbsp;Kamal Kishore,&nbsp;Anjali Mishra,&nbsp;Gyan Chand,&nbsp;Gaurav Agarwal,&nbsp;Amit Agarwal,&nbsp;Ashok Kumar Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/4910961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The concept of short stay thyroidectomy has been tested and in practice in the developed world; the same has not been replicated in countries with limited resources due to lack of organized healthcare system. So, in this study, we tried to analyze if short stay thyroid surgery can be performed in a cost-effective way in developing countries and also if the endocrine surgical trainee can deliver these services safely.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted prospectively from January 2013 to July 2014, at Department of Endocrine Surgery, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India. Study group included patients undergoing short stay hemithyroidectomy whereas matched patients who qualified for inclusion criteria but did not undergo short stay surgery due to various reasons constituted control group. Outcome in both the groups was compared in terms of complication rates, cost benefit, and patient satisfaction. Subgroup analysis was also done for trainee versus consultant performed short stay thyroid surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 439 patients with surgical thyroid disorders were evaluated at our institute during the study period and out of these 110 patients (58 cases and 52 controls) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Younger patients with low socioeconomic status who were paying out of pocket were found to be more inclined to short stay thyroid surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postanesthetic discharge score (PADS), complication rates, and patients satisfaction; however there was significant reduction (p <0.001) in hospital cost in short stay group. In subgroup analysis, procedure time was more in trainee performed surgeries; however there was no significant difference in terms of mean PADS and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short stay thyroidectomy can provide a better cost-effective alternative to conventional thyroidectomy in patients undergoing thyroid surgery and can be safely performed by endocrine surgical trainees even in a low resource setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thyroid Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/4910961\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thyroid Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4910961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thyroid Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4910961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

简介:短期甲状腺切除术的概念已经在发达国家进行了测试和实践;由于缺乏有组织的卫生保健系统,资源有限的国家没有复制同样的情况。因此,在这项研究中,我们试图分析短期甲状腺手术能否在发展中国家以经济有效的方式进行,以及内分泌外科实习医生能否安全地提供这些服务。方法:前瞻性研究于2013年1月至2014年7月在印度勒克瑙SGPGIMS内分泌外科进行。研究组包括行短期半甲状腺切除术的患者,而符合纳入标准但因各种原因未行短期手术的匹配患者构成对照组。两组的结果在并发症发生率、成本效益和患者满意度方面进行比较。对短期甲状腺手术的受术者和顾问进行了亚组分析。结果:在研究期间,我所共评估了439例外科甲状腺疾病患者,其中110例患者(58例和52例对照)符合纳入标准。社会经济地位较低、自费的年轻患者更倾向于短期甲状腺手术。两组在麻醉后出院评分(PADS)、并发症发生率和患者满意度方面无显著差异;结论:短期甲状腺切除术可以为接受甲状腺手术的患者提供更好的成本效益替代传统甲状腺切除术,即使在资源匮乏的环境下,也可以由内分泌外科实习生安全地进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Short Stay Thyroid Surgery: Can We Replicate the Same in Low Resource Setting?

Introduction: The concept of short stay thyroidectomy has been tested and in practice in the developed world; the same has not been replicated in countries with limited resources due to lack of organized healthcare system. So, in this study, we tried to analyze if short stay thyroid surgery can be performed in a cost-effective way in developing countries and also if the endocrine surgical trainee can deliver these services safely.

Methods: The study was conducted prospectively from January 2013 to July 2014, at Department of Endocrine Surgery, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India. Study group included patients undergoing short stay hemithyroidectomy whereas matched patients who qualified for inclusion criteria but did not undergo short stay surgery due to various reasons constituted control group. Outcome in both the groups was compared in terms of complication rates, cost benefit, and patient satisfaction. Subgroup analysis was also done for trainee versus consultant performed short stay thyroid surgery.

Results: A total of 439 patients with surgical thyroid disorders were evaluated at our institute during the study period and out of these 110 patients (58 cases and 52 controls) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Younger patients with low socioeconomic status who were paying out of pocket were found to be more inclined to short stay thyroid surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postanesthetic discharge score (PADS), complication rates, and patients satisfaction; however there was significant reduction (p <0.001) in hospital cost in short stay group. In subgroup analysis, procedure time was more in trainee performed surgeries; however there was no significant difference in terms of mean PADS and complication rates.

Conclusion: Short stay thyroidectomy can provide a better cost-effective alternative to conventional thyroidectomy in patients undergoing thyroid surgery and can be safely performed by endocrine surgical trainees even in a low resource setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thyroid Research
Journal of Thyroid Research ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Thyroidectomy for Euthyroid Patients with Hashimoto Disease and Persistent Symptoms: An Observational, Postrandomization Study Endoscopic Thyroidectomy for Large-Sized Goiters: Merits of the Axillo-Breast Approach with Gas Insufflation. Occult Central Lymph Node Metastasis in cN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients Undergoing TOETVA Procedure. Hashimoto Thyroiditis beyond Cytology: A Correlation between Cytological, Hormonal, Serological, and Radiological Findings. Quality of Life and Surgical Outcome of Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach (TOETVA) versus Open Thyroid Surgery: Experience from a Single Center in Vietnam.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1