具有重复纵向结果的计划随机双臂干预前后试验的功效估计。

Journal of biometrics & biostatistics Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-06-20 DOI:10.4172/2155-6180.1000403
Yirui Hu, Donald R Hoover
{"title":"具有重复纵向结果的计划随机双臂干预前后试验的功效估计。","authors":"Yirui Hu,&nbsp;Donald R Hoover","doi":"10.4172/2155-6180.1000403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intervention effect on ongoing medical processes is estimated from clinical trials on units (i.e. persons or facilities) with fixed timing of repeated longitudinal measurements. All units start out untreated. A randomly chosen subset is switched to the intervention at the same time point. The pre-post switch change in the outcome between these units and unswitched controls is compared using Generalized Least Squares models. Power estimation for such studies is hindered by lack of available GLS based approaches and normative data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We derive Generalized Least Squares variance of the intervention effect. For the commonly assumed compound symmetry correlation structure, this leads to simple power formulas with important optimality properties. To maximize power given a constrained number of total time points, we investigate on the optimal pre-post allocation with the local minimization of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In four examples from nursing home and HIV patients, the Toepltiz within-unit correlation of repeated measures differed from compound symmetry. We applied empirical Toeplitz based calculations for variance of the estimated intervention effect to these examples (each with up to seven longitudinal measures). Unlike what happened under compound symmetry, where power was often maximized with multiple observations being pre-intervention, for these examples, having one pre-intervention measure tended to maximize power. Attempts to approximate the Toeplitz variance structures with compound symmetry (to take advantage of the simpler formulas) resulted in overestimation of power for these examples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While compound symmetry correlation among repeated within-unit measures leads to simple power estimation formulas, this structure often did not hold. There may be strong underestimation of variance of the intervention effect estimate from incorporating short-term within-unit correlation estimates as a common compound symmetry correlation to approximate an unknown Toeplitz correlation without adequately accounting for the correlation between repeated measures declining with time.</p>","PeriodicalId":87294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6180.1000403","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power Estimation in Planning Randomized Two-Arm Pre-Post Intervention Trials with Repeated Longitudinal Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Yirui Hu,&nbsp;Donald R Hoover\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-6180.1000403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intervention effect on ongoing medical processes is estimated from clinical trials on units (i.e. persons or facilities) with fixed timing of repeated longitudinal measurements. All units start out untreated. A randomly chosen subset is switched to the intervention at the same time point. The pre-post switch change in the outcome between these units and unswitched controls is compared using Generalized Least Squares models. Power estimation for such studies is hindered by lack of available GLS based approaches and normative data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We derive Generalized Least Squares variance of the intervention effect. For the commonly assumed compound symmetry correlation structure, this leads to simple power formulas with important optimality properties. To maximize power given a constrained number of total time points, we investigate on the optimal pre-post allocation with the local minimization of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In four examples from nursing home and HIV patients, the Toepltiz within-unit correlation of repeated measures differed from compound symmetry. We applied empirical Toeplitz based calculations for variance of the estimated intervention effect to these examples (each with up to seven longitudinal measures). Unlike what happened under compound symmetry, where power was often maximized with multiple observations being pre-intervention, for these examples, having one pre-intervention measure tended to maximize power. Attempts to approximate the Toeplitz variance structures with compound symmetry (to take advantage of the simpler formulas) resulted in overestimation of power for these examples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While compound symmetry correlation among repeated within-unit measures leads to simple power estimation formulas, this structure often did not hold. There may be strong underestimation of variance of the intervention effect estimate from incorporating short-term within-unit correlation estimates as a common compound symmetry correlation to approximate an unknown Toeplitz correlation without adequately accounting for the correlation between repeated measures declining with time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6180.1000403\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.1000403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.1000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:干预对正在进行的医疗过程的影响是通过对单位(即人员或设施)进行临床试验来估计的,这些单位具有固定的重复纵向测量时间。所有单位一开始都没有治疗。一个随机选择的子集在同一时间点切换到干预。使用广义最小二乘模型比较这些单元和未切换控制之间的结果在切换前和切换后的变化。由于缺乏可用的基于GLS的方法和规范数据,此类研究的功率估计受到阻碍。方法:导出干预效果的广义最小二乘方差。对于通常假设的复合对称相关结构,这导致了具有重要最优性的简单幂公式。为了在给定总时间点数量的约束下使功率最大化,我们研究了局部方差最小的最优前后分配问题。结果:在4例养老院和HIV患者中,重复测量的Toepltiz单位内相关不同于复合对称。我们对这些例子(每个例子最多有七个纵向测量)应用了基于实证Toeplitz的估计干预效果方差计算。与复合对称不同的是,在这种情况下,权力往往是通过多次观察作为预干预来最大化的,对于这些例子来说,有一个预干预措施往往会最大化权力。试图用复合对称近似Toeplitz方差结构(以利用更简单的公式)会导致对这些示例的功率估计过高。结论:虽然重复单位内测量之间的复合对称相关导致简单的功率估计公式,但这种结构往往不成立。由于将短期单位内相关估计作为一种常见的复合对称相关来近似未知的Toeplitz相关,而没有充分考虑随时间下降的重复测量之间的相关性,可能会严重低估干预效果估计的方差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Power Estimation in Planning Randomized Two-Arm Pre-Post Intervention Trials with Repeated Longitudinal Outcomes.

Background: Intervention effect on ongoing medical processes is estimated from clinical trials on units (i.e. persons or facilities) with fixed timing of repeated longitudinal measurements. All units start out untreated. A randomly chosen subset is switched to the intervention at the same time point. The pre-post switch change in the outcome between these units and unswitched controls is compared using Generalized Least Squares models. Power estimation for such studies is hindered by lack of available GLS based approaches and normative data.

Methods: We derive Generalized Least Squares variance of the intervention effect. For the commonly assumed compound symmetry correlation structure, this leads to simple power formulas with important optimality properties. To maximize power given a constrained number of total time points, we investigate on the optimal pre-post allocation with the local minimization of variance.

Results: In four examples from nursing home and HIV patients, the Toepltiz within-unit correlation of repeated measures differed from compound symmetry. We applied empirical Toeplitz based calculations for variance of the estimated intervention effect to these examples (each with up to seven longitudinal measures). Unlike what happened under compound symmetry, where power was often maximized with multiple observations being pre-intervention, for these examples, having one pre-intervention measure tended to maximize power. Attempts to approximate the Toeplitz variance structures with compound symmetry (to take advantage of the simpler formulas) resulted in overestimation of power for these examples.

Conclusions: While compound symmetry correlation among repeated within-unit measures leads to simple power estimation formulas, this structure often did not hold. There may be strong underestimation of variance of the intervention effect estimate from incorporating short-term within-unit correlation estimates as a common compound symmetry correlation to approximate an unknown Toeplitz correlation without adequately accounting for the correlation between repeated measures declining with time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROSPECTIVELY ESTIMATING THE AGE OF INITIATION OF E-CIGARETTES AMONG U.S. YOUTH: FINDINGS FROM THE POPULATION ASSESSMENT OF TOBACCO AND HEALTH (PATH) STUDY, 2013-2017. The Kumaraswamy-Rani Distribution and Its Applications Analytical Visual Methods to Describe Practice Patterns in a Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Non-Interventional Disease Registry Short Prognostic APP for Multiple Myeloma Sample Size Charts for Spearman and Kendall Coefficients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1