Charlson合并症指数与支架再狭窄及冠状动脉病变程度的关系。

Turgut Karabağ, Emіne Altuntaş, Belma Kalaycı, Bahar Şahіn, Mustafa Umut Somuncu, Mustafa Ozan Çakır
{"title":"Charlson合并症指数与支架再狭窄及冠状动脉病变程度的关系。","authors":"Turgut Karabağ,&nbsp;Emіne Altuntaş,&nbsp;Belma Kalaycı,&nbsp;Bahar Şahіn,&nbsp;Mustafa Umut Somuncu,&nbsp;Mustafa Ozan Çakır","doi":"10.1556/1646.10.2018.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of comorbid conditions [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)] on stent restenosis who underwent coronary angioplasty earlier.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups; patients with critical restenosis [recurrent diameter stenosis >50% at the stent segment or its edges (5-mm segments adjacent to the stent) (Group 1; <i>n</i> = 53, mean age: 63.8 ± 9.9 years)] and patients with no critical restenosis [<50% obstruction (Group 2; <i>n</i> = 94, mean age: 62.1 ± 9.1 years)]. The CCI and modified CCI were used for the presence of comorbid conditions. The Gensini scoring system was used to assess the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 had a significantly greater CCI and modified CCI score compared to Group 2 (7.1 ± 3.7 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, <i>p</i> = 0.006; 6.9 ± 3.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5, <i>p</i> = 0.008, respectively). There was a weak correlation, albeit significant, between the modified CCI score and restenosis percentage (<i>r</i> = 0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>r</i> = 0.25, <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, the CCI score is greater among patients with stent restenosis than those without. CCI score is higher among patients with a more diffuse CAD than with a milder disease extent.</p>","PeriodicalId":45181,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","volume":"10 2","pages":"70-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1646.10.2018.20","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship of Charlson comorbidity index with stent restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease.\",\"authors\":\"Turgut Karabağ,&nbsp;Emіne Altuntaş,&nbsp;Belma Kalaycı,&nbsp;Bahar Şahіn,&nbsp;Mustafa Umut Somuncu,&nbsp;Mustafa Ozan Çakır\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/1646.10.2018.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of comorbid conditions [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)] on stent restenosis who underwent coronary angioplasty earlier.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups; patients with critical restenosis [recurrent diameter stenosis >50% at the stent segment or its edges (5-mm segments adjacent to the stent) (Group 1; <i>n</i> = 53, mean age: 63.8 ± 9.9 years)] and patients with no critical restenosis [<50% obstruction (Group 2; <i>n</i> = 94, mean age: 62.1 ± 9.1 years)]. The CCI and modified CCI were used for the presence of comorbid conditions. The Gensini scoring system was used to assess the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 had a significantly greater CCI and modified CCI score compared to Group 2 (7.1 ± 3.7 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, <i>p</i> = 0.006; 6.9 ± 3.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5, <i>p</i> = 0.008, respectively). There was a weak correlation, albeit significant, between the modified CCI score and restenosis percentage (<i>r</i> = 0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>r</i> = 0.25, <i>p</i> = 0.003, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, the CCI score is greater among patients with stent restenosis than those without. CCI score is higher among patients with a more diffuse CAD than with a milder disease extent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"70-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1646.10.2018.20\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.10.2018.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Medicine and Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.10.2018.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是探讨合并症[Charlson共病指数(CCI)]对早期行冠状动脉血管成形术患者支架再狭窄的影响。方法:将患者分为两组;严重再狭窄患者[支架段或其边缘(与支架相邻的5mm段)复发直径狭窄>50%](1组;N = 53,平均年龄:63.8±9.9岁)和无危重性再狭窄患者[N = 94,平均年龄:62.1±9.1岁)]。CCI和改良的CCI用于存在合并症的情况。采用Gensini评分系统评估冠状动脉病变(CAD)程度。结果:1组CCI和改良CCI评分明显高于2组(7.1±3.7 vs. 5.6±1.6,p = 0.006;6.9±3.6和4.5±1.5,p = 0.008)。改良后的CCI评分与再狭窄百分比之间虽有统计学意义,但相关性较弱(r = 0.29, p r = 0.25, p = 0.003)。结论:支架再狭窄患者CCI评分高于支架再狭窄患者。弥漫性冠心病患者的CCI评分高于病情较轻的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship of Charlson comorbidity index with stent restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of comorbid conditions [Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)] on stent restenosis who underwent coronary angioplasty earlier.

Methods: Patients were divided into two groups; patients with critical restenosis [recurrent diameter stenosis >50% at the stent segment or its edges (5-mm segments adjacent to the stent) (Group 1; n = 53, mean age: 63.8 ± 9.9 years)] and patients with no critical restenosis [<50% obstruction (Group 2; n = 94, mean age: 62.1 ± 9.1 years)]. The CCI and modified CCI were used for the presence of comorbid conditions. The Gensini scoring system was used to assess the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD).

Results: Group 1 had a significantly greater CCI and modified CCI score compared to Group 2 (7.1 ± 3.7 vs. 5.6 ± 1.6, p = 0.006; 6.9 ± 3.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.5, p = 0.008, respectively). There was a weak correlation, albeit significant, between the modified CCI score and restenosis percentage (r = 0.29, p < 0.001; r = 0.25, p = 0.003, respectively).

Conclusions: In conclusion, the CCI score is greater among patients with stent restenosis than those without. CCI score is higher among patients with a more diffuse CAD than with a milder disease extent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science
Interventional Medicine and Applied Science MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Plasma interleukin-6 levels correlate with survival in patients with bacterial sepsis and septic shock. Levels of glucagon-like peptide 1 in hyperemesis gravidarum. ln vitro inhibition of beta-hematin formation and in vivo effects of Diospyros mespiliformis and Mondia whitei methanol extracts on chloroquine-susceptible Plasmodium berghei-induced malaria in mice. Pulsation of catheter during coronary angiography: Is it a sign of severe aortic regurgitation? Efficacy, safety and tolerability of bosentan as an adjuvant to sildenafil and sildenafil alone in persistant pulmonary hypertension of newborn (PPHN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1