日本妇产科医生对代孕的看法:1983年人类体外受精的成功应用。

Minobu Sadaoka
{"title":"日本妇产科医生对代孕的看法:1983年人类体外受精的成功应用。","authors":"Minobu Sadaoka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study confirmed opinions on surrogacy conducted by obstetricians who were affiliated with a university in the 1980s, based on the clue that a child was born using human in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1983. This research also examined the question of why Japanese obstetricians limited the target population for IVF to legally married couples and excluded women (wives) who had undergone total hysterectomies. The women's movement has criticized the gender discrimination that occurred in IVF. Obstetricians had predicted the advancement of human IVF, and that it would raise legal and ethical issues regarding this form of surrogacy. Around this time, there was a lawsuit known as the Fujimi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Case, which exposed the realities of performing a total hysterectomy after an unjustified diagnosis. It was believed that obstetricians had obstructed the normal sequence of events in which a patient selects surrogacy after undergoing a hysterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74310,"journal":{"name":"Nihon ishigaku zasshi. [Journal of Japanese history of medicine]","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetricians' and Gynecologists' Opinion on Surrogacy in Japan: The Successful Use of Human In Vitro Fertilization in 1983.\",\"authors\":\"Minobu Sadaoka\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study confirmed opinions on surrogacy conducted by obstetricians who were affiliated with a university in the 1980s, based on the clue that a child was born using human in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1983. This research also examined the question of why Japanese obstetricians limited the target population for IVF to legally married couples and excluded women (wives) who had undergone total hysterectomies. The women's movement has criticized the gender discrimination that occurred in IVF. Obstetricians had predicted the advancement of human IVF, and that it would raise legal and ethical issues regarding this form of surrogacy. Around this time, there was a lawsuit known as the Fujimi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Case, which exposed the realities of performing a total hysterectomy after an unjustified diagnosis. It was believed that obstetricians had obstructed the normal sequence of events in which a patient selects surrogacy after undergoing a hysterectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon ishigaku zasshi. [Journal of Japanese history of medicine]\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon ishigaku zasshi. [Journal of Japanese history of medicine]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon ishigaku zasshi. [Journal of Japanese history of medicine]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究以1983年通过体外受精(IVF)出生的婴儿为线索,确认了80年代某大学附属产科医生对代孕的看法。这项研究还调查了为什么日本产科医生将试管婴儿的目标人群限制在合法结婚的夫妇中,而排除了接受过全子宫切除术的妇女(妻子)。妇女运动批评了试管婴儿中出现的性别歧视。产科医生已经预测到人类体外受精的进步,并且它会引起关于这种形式的代孕的法律和伦理问题。大约在这个时候,发生了一起被称为藤井妇产科医院案的诉讼,它暴露了在不合理的诊断后进行全子宫切除术的现实。人们认为,产科医生阻碍了患者在子宫切除术后选择代孕的正常顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Obstetricians' and Gynecologists' Opinion on Surrogacy in Japan: The Successful Use of Human In Vitro Fertilization in 1983.

This study confirmed opinions on surrogacy conducted by obstetricians who were affiliated with a university in the 1980s, based on the clue that a child was born using human in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 1983. This research also examined the question of why Japanese obstetricians limited the target population for IVF to legally married couples and excluded women (wives) who had undergone total hysterectomies. The women's movement has criticized the gender discrimination that occurred in IVF. Obstetricians had predicted the advancement of human IVF, and that it would raise legal and ethical issues regarding this form of surrogacy. Around this time, there was a lawsuit known as the Fujimi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Case, which exposed the realities of performing a total hysterectomy after an unjustified diagnosis. It was believed that obstetricians had obstructed the normal sequence of events in which a patient selects surrogacy after undergoing a hysterectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
History of Western Artistic Anatomy in the 19th Century: Prehistory of Artistic Anatomy in Japan. A Consideration on the Origin of Seishu Hanaoka's Nyugan-jun and Nyugan-jun Furoku. Dutch Research on Beriberi: I. Christiaan Eijkman's Research and Evaluation of Kanehiro Takaki's Diet Reforms of the Japanese Navy. Three Newly-Discovered Copies of the Manuscript Mayaku Ko, Written by Shutei Nakagawa, with Special Reference to their Appearance and Genealogy. Ryozo Chiba's Ben-nyugansho narabini Chiho Soko and Nyuganbensho or Nyuganben: The Practice of Hanaoka's Breast Cancer Surgery in 1811.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1