{"title":"基于GHBMC第50百分位男性行人简化模型的可调节通用简化车辆行人碰撞建模及相应参考PMHS测试仿真","authors":"Eric Song, Philippe Petit, Jerome Uriot","doi":"10.4271/2018-22-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a previous study (Song et al. 2017), an adjustable generic simplified vehicle buck was developed; eleven PMHS were impacted by the buck representing a SUV, a van and a sedan successively; and biofidelity corridors were established. The objectives of the current study were 1) to develop the computational model of the buck, and 2) to simulate these PMHS tests with the buck model and to assess the biofidelity of the GHBMC 50<sup>th</sup> percentile male pedestrian simplified model (GHBMC M50-PS). First, coupon tensile tests and static and dynamic compression tests were performed on the steel tubes representing the bonnet leading edge (BLE), the bumper and the spoiler used in the above PMHS tests. Based on these tests, the computational models of the above components were then developed and validated. Next, the buck model was built with the component models, and used to simulate the PMHS tests with the GHBMC M50-PS model. These simulations allowed to evaluate the biofidelity of the GHBMC M50-PS model in terms of 1) impact forces between the pedestrian and the buck, 2) pedestrian kinematics, and 3) injury outcome resulted. The model well predicted the total longitudinal impact force between the pedestrian and the buck for all three vehicle types, with a total CORA score between 0.72 and 0.78. However, the force distribution across the BLE, bumper and spoiler showed some significant deviations. The kinematic response of the model was rated as fair with a total CORA score ranging between 0.52 and 0.58. It seems necessary to increase the compliance of the GHBMC M50-PS model and its energy dissipation capability in order to achieve a better correlation of its kinematic response. Finally, the model predicted more knee ligament ruptures than observed in the PMHS tests, but less bone fracture of the femur and the fibula.</p>","PeriodicalId":35289,"journal":{"name":"Stapp car crash journal","volume":"62 ","pages":"443-487"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling of an Adjustable Generic Simplified Vehicle for Pedestrian Impact and Simulations of Corresponding Reference PMHS Tests Using the GHBMC 50<sup>th</sup> Percentile Male Pedestrian Simplified Model.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Song, Philippe Petit, Jerome Uriot\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/2018-22-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a previous study (Song et al. 2017), an adjustable generic simplified vehicle buck was developed; eleven PMHS were impacted by the buck representing a SUV, a van and a sedan successively; and biofidelity corridors were established. The objectives of the current study were 1) to develop the computational model of the buck, and 2) to simulate these PMHS tests with the buck model and to assess the biofidelity of the GHBMC 50<sup>th</sup> percentile male pedestrian simplified model (GHBMC M50-PS). First, coupon tensile tests and static and dynamic compression tests were performed on the steel tubes representing the bonnet leading edge (BLE), the bumper and the spoiler used in the above PMHS tests. Based on these tests, the computational models of the above components were then developed and validated. Next, the buck model was built with the component models, and used to simulate the PMHS tests with the GHBMC M50-PS model. These simulations allowed to evaluate the biofidelity of the GHBMC M50-PS model in terms of 1) impact forces between the pedestrian and the buck, 2) pedestrian kinematics, and 3) injury outcome resulted. The model well predicted the total longitudinal impact force between the pedestrian and the buck for all three vehicle types, with a total CORA score between 0.72 and 0.78. However, the force distribution across the BLE, bumper and spoiler showed some significant deviations. The kinematic response of the model was rated as fair with a total CORA score ranging between 0.52 and 0.58. It seems necessary to increase the compliance of the GHBMC M50-PS model and its energy dissipation capability in order to achieve a better correlation of its kinematic response. Finally, the model predicted more knee ligament ruptures than observed in the PMHS tests, but less bone fracture of the femur and the fibula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stapp car crash journal\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"443-487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stapp car crash journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-22-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stapp car crash journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-22-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在之前的一项研究中(Song et al. 2017),开发了一种可调节的通用简化车辆buck;11名PMHS依次受到代表SUV、面包车和轿车的雄鹿的影响;并建立了生物保真走廊。本研究的目的是:(1)建立buck的计算模型;(2)用buck模型模拟PMHS测试,并评估GHBMC第50百分位男性行人简化模型(GHBMC M50-PS)的生物保真度。首先,对上述PMHS试验中使用的代表发动机罩前缘(BLE)、保险杠和扰流板的钢管进行了联片拉伸试验和静态和动态压缩试验。在这些试验的基础上,建立并验证了上述构件的计算模型。其次,利用构件模型建立buck模型,并利用GHBMC M50-PS模型对PMHS试验进行仿真。这些模拟可以从以下几个方面评估GHBMC M50-PS模型的生物保真度:1)行人与雄鹿之间的冲击力,2)行人运动学,以及3)损伤结果。该模型较好地预测了三种车型的行人与雄鹿之间的总纵向冲击力,总CORA得分在0.72 ~ 0.78之间。然而,在低挡板、保险杠和扰流板上的力分布表现出一些显著的偏差。模型的运动响应被评为公平,总CORA得分在0.52到0.58之间。为了获得更好的运动学响应相关性,有必要提高GHBMC M50-PS模型的柔度和耗能能力。最后,该模型预测的膝关节韧带破裂比PMHS试验中观察到的更多,但股骨和腓骨骨折较少。
Modelling of an Adjustable Generic Simplified Vehicle for Pedestrian Impact and Simulations of Corresponding Reference PMHS Tests Using the GHBMC 50th Percentile Male Pedestrian Simplified Model.
In a previous study (Song et al. 2017), an adjustable generic simplified vehicle buck was developed; eleven PMHS were impacted by the buck representing a SUV, a van and a sedan successively; and biofidelity corridors were established. The objectives of the current study were 1) to develop the computational model of the buck, and 2) to simulate these PMHS tests with the buck model and to assess the biofidelity of the GHBMC 50th percentile male pedestrian simplified model (GHBMC M50-PS). First, coupon tensile tests and static and dynamic compression tests were performed on the steel tubes representing the bonnet leading edge (BLE), the bumper and the spoiler used in the above PMHS tests. Based on these tests, the computational models of the above components were then developed and validated. Next, the buck model was built with the component models, and used to simulate the PMHS tests with the GHBMC M50-PS model. These simulations allowed to evaluate the biofidelity of the GHBMC M50-PS model in terms of 1) impact forces between the pedestrian and the buck, 2) pedestrian kinematics, and 3) injury outcome resulted. The model well predicted the total longitudinal impact force between the pedestrian and the buck for all three vehicle types, with a total CORA score between 0.72 and 0.78. However, the force distribution across the BLE, bumper and spoiler showed some significant deviations. The kinematic response of the model was rated as fair with a total CORA score ranging between 0.52 and 0.58. It seems necessary to increase the compliance of the GHBMC M50-PS model and its energy dissipation capability in order to achieve a better correlation of its kinematic response. Finally, the model predicted more knee ligament ruptures than observed in the PMHS tests, but less bone fracture of the femur and the fibula.