新型全自动实时逆转录聚合酶链反应试剂盒检测诺如病毒的性能评价

Tomohiro Hosoda, Yuki Uehara, Naoto Matsuda, Yukiko Kawase', Mika Tanei, Yuichiro Haba, Ayako Nakamura, Yoko Tabe, Toshio Naito, Akimichi Ohsaka
{"title":"新型全自动实时逆转录聚合酶链反应试剂盒检测诺如病毒的性能评价","authors":"Tomohiro Hosoda,&nbsp;Yuki Uehara,&nbsp;Naoto Matsuda,&nbsp;Yukiko Kawase',&nbsp;Mika Tanei,&nbsp;Yuichiro Haba,&nbsp;Ayako Nakamura,&nbsp;Yoko Tabe,&nbsp;Toshio Naito,&nbsp;Akimichi Ohsaka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rapid and accurate detection of norovirus is essential for the prevention and control of the out- breaks. The aim of this study is to compare the fully automated real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction method (EV-kit) with the conventional immunochromatography method (IC) for diagnosis of norovirus, using one-tube reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2013 and March 2014, clinical data and fecal specimens (53 bulk stools, 41 rectal swabs) were collected from 94 patients who visited the Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University Hospital for acute diarrhea. The sensitivity and specificity of each study test was determined by comparing with RT-PCR, and reproducibility was analyzed by determining Cohen's kappa coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 94 specimens, 35(37%, 26 bulk stools, 9 rectal swabs) were positive for norovirus antigen by RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's kappa coefficient of the EV-kit were 91% (32/35), 88% (52/59), and 0.778, respectively; those of the IC were 54% (19/35), 90% (53/59), and 0.468, respectively. For rectal swab testing, the sensitivity was 89% (8/9) for the EV-kit and 33% (3/9) for IC, ana that for bulk stool testing was 92% (24/26) for the EV-kit and 62% (16/26) for IC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of the EV-kit was significantly more sensitive than was IC testing, taking RT-PCR analy- sis as the gold standard. Rectal swab or bulk stool specimens may be adequate for the detection of norovirus antigen when the EV-kit is used. [Original].</p>","PeriodicalId":21457,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology","volume":"64 12","pages":"1347-1352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of a Novel Fully Automated Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction Kit for the Detection of Norovirus.\",\"authors\":\"Tomohiro Hosoda,&nbsp;Yuki Uehara,&nbsp;Naoto Matsuda,&nbsp;Yukiko Kawase',&nbsp;Mika Tanei,&nbsp;Yuichiro Haba,&nbsp;Ayako Nakamura,&nbsp;Yoko Tabe,&nbsp;Toshio Naito,&nbsp;Akimichi Ohsaka\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rapid and accurate detection of norovirus is essential for the prevention and control of the out- breaks. The aim of this study is to compare the fully automated real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction method (EV-kit) with the conventional immunochromatography method (IC) for diagnosis of norovirus, using one-tube reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2013 and March 2014, clinical data and fecal specimens (53 bulk stools, 41 rectal swabs) were collected from 94 patients who visited the Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University Hospital for acute diarrhea. The sensitivity and specificity of each study test was determined by comparing with RT-PCR, and reproducibility was analyzed by determining Cohen's kappa coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 94 specimens, 35(37%, 26 bulk stools, 9 rectal swabs) were positive for norovirus antigen by RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's kappa coefficient of the EV-kit were 91% (32/35), 88% (52/59), and 0.778, respectively; those of the IC were 54% (19/35), 90% (53/59), and 0.468, respectively. For rectal swab testing, the sensitivity was 89% (8/9) for the EV-kit and 33% (3/9) for IC, ana that for bulk stool testing was 92% (24/26) for the EV-kit and 62% (16/26) for IC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of the EV-kit was significantly more sensitive than was IC testing, taking RT-PCR analy- sis as the gold standard. Rectal swab or bulk stool specimens may be adequate for the detection of norovirus antigen when the EV-kit is used. [Original].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology\",\"volume\":\"64 12\",\"pages\":\"1347-1352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:快速、准确地检测诺如病毒对预防和控制疫情至关重要。本研究以单管逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)为金标准,比较全自动实时逆转录-聚合酶链反应法(EV-kit)与常规免疫层析法(IC)诊断诺如病毒的效果。方法:收集2013年11月至2014年3月在中山大学附属医院综合内科就诊的94例急性腹泻患者的临床资料和粪便标本(大便53例,直肠拭子41例)。通过与RT-PCR的比较确定各研究试验的敏感性和特异性,并通过测定Cohen’s kappa系数分析重复性。结果:94份标本中,35份(37%)经RT-PCR检测为诺如病毒抗原阳性,26份为散装粪便,9份为直肠拭子。EV-kit的敏感性为91%(32/35),特异性为88% (52/59),Cohen’s kappa系数为0.778;IC组分别为54%(19/35)、90%(53/59)和0.468。直肠拭子检测中,EV-kit的灵敏度为89% (8/9),IC的灵敏度为33%(3/9),大大便检测中EV-kit的灵敏度为92% (24/26),IC的灵敏度为62%(16/26)。结论:以RT-PCR分析为金标准,EV-kit的使用明显高于IC检测。当使用EV-kit时,直肠拭子或大块粪便标本可能足以检测诺如病毒抗原。(最初的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Evaluation of a Novel Fully Automated Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction Kit for the Detection of Norovirus.

Objective: Rapid and accurate detection of norovirus is essential for the prevention and control of the out- breaks. The aim of this study is to compare the fully automated real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction method (EV-kit) with the conventional immunochromatography method (IC) for diagnosis of norovirus, using one-tube reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis as the gold standard.

Methods: Between November 2013 and March 2014, clinical data and fecal specimens (53 bulk stools, 41 rectal swabs) were collected from 94 patients who visited the Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University Hospital for acute diarrhea. The sensitivity and specificity of each study test was determined by comparing with RT-PCR, and reproducibility was analyzed by determining Cohen's kappa coefficients.

Results: Of 94 specimens, 35(37%, 26 bulk stools, 9 rectal swabs) were positive for norovirus antigen by RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's kappa coefficient of the EV-kit were 91% (32/35), 88% (52/59), and 0.778, respectively; those of the IC were 54% (19/35), 90% (53/59), and 0.468, respectively. For rectal swab testing, the sensitivity was 89% (8/9) for the EV-kit and 33% (3/9) for IC, ana that for bulk stool testing was 92% (24/26) for the EV-kit and 62% (16/26) for IC.

Conclusions: Use of the EV-kit was significantly more sensitive than was IC testing, taking RT-PCR analy- sis as the gold standard. Rectal swab or bulk stool specimens may be adequate for the detection of norovirus antigen when the EV-kit is used. [Original].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Candida]. [Bleeding time]. [Microparticle]. [Aldolase]. [Telomerase].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1