{"title":"脑卒中患者二级预防数字健康干预的健康经济评估:系统综述。","authors":"Alexis Valenzuela Espinoza, Stephane Steurbaut, Alain Dupont, Pieter Cornu, Robbert-Jan van Hooff, Raf Brouns, Koen Putman","doi":"10.1159/000496107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the first 5 years after their stroke, about a quarter of patients will suffer from a recurrent stroke. Digital health interventions facilitating interactions between a caregiver and a patient from a distance are a promising approach to improve patient adherence to lifestyle changes proposed by secondary prevention guidelines. Many of these interventions are not implemented in daily practice, even though efficacy has been shown. One of the reasons can be the lack of clear economic incentives for implementation. We propose to map all health economic evidence regarding digital health interventions for secondary stroke prevention.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>We performed a systematic search according to PRISMA-P guidelines and searched on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database. Only digital health interventions for secondary prevention in stroke patients were included and all study designs and health economic outcomes were accepted. We combined the terms \"Stroke OR Cardiovascular,\" \"Secondary prevention,\" \"Digital health interventions,\" and \"Cost\" in one search string using the AND operator. The search performed on April 20, 2017 yielded 163 records of which 26 duplicates were removed. After abstract screening, 20 articles were retained for full-text analysis, of which none reported any health economic evidence that could be included for analysis or discussion. Key Messages: There is a lack of evidence on health economic outcomes on digital health interventions for secondary stroke prevention. Future research in this area should take health economics into consideration when designing a trial and there is a clear need for health economic evidence and models.</p>","PeriodicalId":45709,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000496107","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Secondary Prevention in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Valenzuela Espinoza, Stephane Steurbaut, Alain Dupont, Pieter Cornu, Robbert-Jan van Hooff, Raf Brouns, Koen Putman\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000496107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the first 5 years after their stroke, about a quarter of patients will suffer from a recurrent stroke. Digital health interventions facilitating interactions between a caregiver and a patient from a distance are a promising approach to improve patient adherence to lifestyle changes proposed by secondary prevention guidelines. Many of these interventions are not implemented in daily practice, even though efficacy has been shown. One of the reasons can be the lack of clear economic incentives for implementation. We propose to map all health economic evidence regarding digital health interventions for secondary stroke prevention.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>We performed a systematic search according to PRISMA-P guidelines and searched on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database. Only digital health interventions for secondary prevention in stroke patients were included and all study designs and health economic outcomes were accepted. We combined the terms \\\"Stroke OR Cardiovascular,\\\" \\\"Secondary prevention,\\\" \\\"Digital health interventions,\\\" and \\\"Cost\\\" in one search string using the AND operator. The search performed on April 20, 2017 yielded 163 records of which 26 duplicates were removed. After abstract screening, 20 articles were retained for full-text analysis, of which none reported any health economic evidence that could be included for analysis or discussion. Key Messages: There is a lack of evidence on health economic outcomes on digital health interventions for secondary stroke prevention. Future research in this area should take health economics into consideration when designing a trial and there is a clear need for health economic evidence and models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000496107\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000496107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000496107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
背景:在中风后的前5年,大约四分之一的患者会遭受复发性中风。促进护理人员和患者远距离互动的数字健康干预措施是一种很有前途的方法,可以提高患者对二级预防指南提出的生活方式改变的依从性。其中许多干预措施没有在日常实践中实施,尽管已经显示出疗效。其中一个原因可能是缺乏明确的执行经济激励措施。我们建议绘制关于二次中风预防数字健康干预的所有健康经济证据。摘要:我们根据PRISMA-P指南进行了系统搜索,并在PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane和国家卫生研究所经济评估数据库上进行了搜索。仅纳入了用于中风患者二级预防的数字健康干预措施,并接受了所有研究设计和健康经济结果。我们使用and运算符将术语“中风或心血管疾病”、“二级预防”、“数字健康干预”和“成本”组合在一个搜索字符串中。2017年4月20日进行的搜索产生了163条记录,其中26条重复记录被删除。经过摘要筛选,保留了20篇文章进行全文分析,其中没有一篇报告了任何可供分析或讨论的健康经济证据。关键信息:缺乏关于二次中风预防数字健康干预的健康经济结果的证据。在设计试验时,该领域的未来研究应考虑健康经济学,显然需要健康经济学证据和模型。
Health Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Secondary Prevention in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.
Background: In the first 5 years after their stroke, about a quarter of patients will suffer from a recurrent stroke. Digital health interventions facilitating interactions between a caregiver and a patient from a distance are a promising approach to improve patient adherence to lifestyle changes proposed by secondary prevention guidelines. Many of these interventions are not implemented in daily practice, even though efficacy has been shown. One of the reasons can be the lack of clear economic incentives for implementation. We propose to map all health economic evidence regarding digital health interventions for secondary stroke prevention.
Summary: We performed a systematic search according to PRISMA-P guidelines and searched on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database. Only digital health interventions for secondary prevention in stroke patients were included and all study designs and health economic outcomes were accepted. We combined the terms "Stroke OR Cardiovascular," "Secondary prevention," "Digital health interventions," and "Cost" in one search string using the AND operator. The search performed on April 20, 2017 yielded 163 records of which 26 duplicates were removed. After abstract screening, 20 articles were retained for full-text analysis, of which none reported any health economic evidence that could be included for analysis or discussion. Key Messages: There is a lack of evidence on health economic outcomes on digital health interventions for secondary stroke prevention. Future research in this area should take health economics into consideration when designing a trial and there is a clear need for health economic evidence and models.
期刊介绍:
This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of stroke and cerebrovascular research, drawing from a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. Offering an international forum, it meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues. The journal publishes original contributions, reviews of selected topics as well as clinical investigative studies. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears only if directly relevant to clinical issues. Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Cerebrovascular Diseases.