亚太岛民糖尿病困扰量表的验证。

Naomi Fukuda, Krupa Gandhi, Eunjung Lim, Anne Leake
{"title":"亚太岛民糖尿病困扰量表的验证。","authors":"Naomi Fukuda,&nbsp;Krupa Gandhi,&nbsp;Eunjung Lim,&nbsp;Anne Leake","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes distress (DD) generally refers to the emotional and cognitive stress caused by the daily management of diabetes. The Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)-17 is a 17-item instrument that is frequently used to screen DD and the Fisher's DDS2, developed by Fisher, et al, is a two-item instrument to quickly identify DD. However, these scales have been validated in Caucasian populations but not in Asian Pacific Islander (API) populations. This study aimed to 1) evaluate content validity of the DDS17 by evaluating correlation with hemoglobin A1c and 2) identify two items to develop a brief screening tool, DDS2, for an API population. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 443 patients at a diabetes center in Hawai'i. On their initial visit, patients filled out the DDS17 as a part of the standard of care. The DDS17 showed high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). The two items of our DDS2 with the highest phi coefficient (0.59 each) to the total DDS17 subscales were selected from the interpersonal distress and the emotional burden subscales. The phi coefficient (0.74) of our DDS2 was higher than that of the Fisher's DDS2 (0.60). All DDS items showed positive correlation with hemoglobin A1c (DDS17: r = 0.18, DDS2: r = 0.16, Fisher's DDS2: r = 0.21, respectively). Therefore, these scales can be used to measure DD in an API population and the positive correlation suggests that addressing DD may improve glycemic control and vice versa. Clinicians with limited time may consider using our DDS2 rather than DDS17 to quickly screen the API population for DD.</p>","PeriodicalId":73197,"journal":{"name":"Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health","volume":"78 1","pages":"3-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333958/pdf/hjmph7801_0003.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Diabetes Distress Scale in an Asian Pacific Islander Population.\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Fukuda,&nbsp;Krupa Gandhi,&nbsp;Eunjung Lim,&nbsp;Anne Leake\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diabetes distress (DD) generally refers to the emotional and cognitive stress caused by the daily management of diabetes. The Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)-17 is a 17-item instrument that is frequently used to screen DD and the Fisher's DDS2, developed by Fisher, et al, is a two-item instrument to quickly identify DD. However, these scales have been validated in Caucasian populations but not in Asian Pacific Islander (API) populations. This study aimed to 1) evaluate content validity of the DDS17 by evaluating correlation with hemoglobin A1c and 2) identify two items to develop a brief screening tool, DDS2, for an API population. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 443 patients at a diabetes center in Hawai'i. On their initial visit, patients filled out the DDS17 as a part of the standard of care. The DDS17 showed high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). The two items of our DDS2 with the highest phi coefficient (0.59 each) to the total DDS17 subscales were selected from the interpersonal distress and the emotional burden subscales. The phi coefficient (0.74) of our DDS2 was higher than that of the Fisher's DDS2 (0.60). All DDS items showed positive correlation with hemoglobin A1c (DDS17: r = 0.18, DDS2: r = 0.16, Fisher's DDS2: r = 0.21, respectively). Therefore, these scales can be used to measure DD in an API population and the positive correlation suggests that addressing DD may improve glycemic control and vice versa. Clinicians with limited time may consider using our DDS2 rather than DDS17 to quickly screen the API population for DD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"3-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6333958/pdf/hjmph7801_0003.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病窘迫(Diabetes distress, DD)一般是指日常糖尿病管理过程中产生的情绪和认知压力。糖尿病困扰量表(DDS)-17是一个17项的工具,经常用于筛查DD, Fisher等人开发的Fisher's DDS2是一个两项的工具,用于快速识别DD。然而,这些量表已在高加索人群中得到验证,但未在亚太岛民(API)人群中得到验证。本研究旨在1)通过评估DDS17与血红蛋白A1c的相关性来评估DDS17的含量效度;2)确定两个项目来开发一种用于API人群的简短筛选工具DDS2。我们对夏威夷一家糖尿病中心的443名患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。在初次就诊时,患者填写了DDS17,作为标准护理的一部分。DDS17具有较高的信度(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94)。从人际困扰和情绪负担两个分量表中,选择我们的DDS2中与总DDS17分量表的phi系数最高的两个项目,各为0.59。我们的DDS2的phi系数(0.74)高于Fisher的DDS2(0.60)。所有DDS项与血红蛋白A1c呈正相关(DDS17: r = 0.18, DDS2: r = 0.16, Fisher’s DDS2: r = 0.21)。因此,这些量表可用于测量API人群的DD,正相关表明解决DD可能改善血糖控制,反之亦然。时间有限的临床医生可以考虑使用我们的DDS2而不是DDS17来快速筛查API人群的DD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Diabetes Distress Scale in an Asian Pacific Islander Population.

Diabetes distress (DD) generally refers to the emotional and cognitive stress caused by the daily management of diabetes. The Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS)-17 is a 17-item instrument that is frequently used to screen DD and the Fisher's DDS2, developed by Fisher, et al, is a two-item instrument to quickly identify DD. However, these scales have been validated in Caucasian populations but not in Asian Pacific Islander (API) populations. This study aimed to 1) evaluate content validity of the DDS17 by evaluating correlation with hemoglobin A1c and 2) identify two items to develop a brief screening tool, DDS2, for an API population. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 443 patients at a diabetes center in Hawai'i. On their initial visit, patients filled out the DDS17 as a part of the standard of care. The DDS17 showed high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94). The two items of our DDS2 with the highest phi coefficient (0.59 each) to the total DDS17 subscales were selected from the interpersonal distress and the emotional burden subscales. The phi coefficient (0.74) of our DDS2 was higher than that of the Fisher's DDS2 (0.60). All DDS items showed positive correlation with hemoglobin A1c (DDS17: r = 0.18, DDS2: r = 0.16, Fisher's DDS2: r = 0.21, respectively). Therefore, these scales can be used to measure DD in an API population and the positive correlation suggests that addressing DD may improve glycemic control and vice versa. Clinicians with limited time may consider using our DDS2 rather than DDS17 to quickly screen the API population for DD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Risk and Protective Factors Associated with HIV and HCV Infections Among Male High School Students Who Have Sex with Males-Hawai'i, 2013, 2015, and 2017. Rising Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in Patients Younger than Age 50 in Hawai'i. Fishhook Injury of the Anterior Chamber Angle of the Eye. Community Demand, Academic Partnership, and the Birth ofthe Bachelor of Social Work Program Distance Education Option. A Unique Partnership Between the University of Hawai'i Cancer Center and the University of Guam: Fifteen Years of Addressing Cancer Health Disparities in Pacific Islanders in Hawai'i and Guam.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1