协同课程设计:为生命科学教学提供内容知识的教师专业发展设计框架。

Journal of STEM outreach Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-01-17 DOI:10.15695/jstem/v1i1.2
Stephanie Tammen, Russell Faux, Karina Meiri, Berri Jacque
{"title":"协同课程设计:为生命科学教学提供内容知识的教师专业发展设计框架。","authors":"Stephanie Tammen,&nbsp;Russell Faux,&nbsp;Karina Meiri,&nbsp;Berri Jacque","doi":"10.15695/jstem/v1i1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective science teaching critically requires content focused professional development (PD), particularly in life sciences where content evolves rapidly. How subject matter knowledge related to teaching (SCK) is most effectively incorporated into PD has not been investigated. We studied how a professional learning community of high school teachers and scientists co-designing a bioscience curriculum produced the accompanying SCK-focused PD. SCK was level-specific but teachers could not generate it alone. Co-designing SCK with scientists was valuable to teachers, as evidenced by significant increases in their cognitive and attitudinal attributes toward the PD, in turn promoting change in practice and student learning gains, both within and outside the initial partnership. Surprisingly, social network analysis of how the collaborators interacted revealed that though the network was cognitively and effectively robust, it was behaviorally much sparser than anticipated for such a high functioning partnership, counter to commonly accepted PD best practices. We suggest that the scientist/educator facilitators who intentionally promoted collaboration in the context of distributed leadership were able to eliminate extraneous interactions, optimizing the process. The results are further evidence that developing content-focused PD relevant to 21<sup>st</sup> century life sciences requires dismantling the institutionalized segregation between practitioners of science and teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":73956,"journal":{"name":"Journal of STEM outreach","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364852/pdf/nihms968898.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative Curriculum Design as a Framework for Designing Teacher Professional Development that Produces the Content Knowledge for Teaching the Life Sciences.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Tammen,&nbsp;Russell Faux,&nbsp;Karina Meiri,&nbsp;Berri Jacque\",\"doi\":\"10.15695/jstem/v1i1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective science teaching critically requires content focused professional development (PD), particularly in life sciences where content evolves rapidly. How subject matter knowledge related to teaching (SCK) is most effectively incorporated into PD has not been investigated. We studied how a professional learning community of high school teachers and scientists co-designing a bioscience curriculum produced the accompanying SCK-focused PD. SCK was level-specific but teachers could not generate it alone. Co-designing SCK with scientists was valuable to teachers, as evidenced by significant increases in their cognitive and attitudinal attributes toward the PD, in turn promoting change in practice and student learning gains, both within and outside the initial partnership. Surprisingly, social network analysis of how the collaborators interacted revealed that though the network was cognitively and effectively robust, it was behaviorally much sparser than anticipated for such a high functioning partnership, counter to commonly accepted PD best practices. We suggest that the scientist/educator facilitators who intentionally promoted collaboration in the context of distributed leadership were able to eliminate extraneous interactions, optimizing the process. The results are further evidence that developing content-focused PD relevant to 21<sup>st</sup> century life sciences requires dismantling the institutionalized segregation between practitioners of science and teaching.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of STEM outreach\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364852/pdf/nihms968898.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of STEM outreach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v1i1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of STEM outreach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v1i1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有效的科学教学严格要求以内容为中心的专业发展(PD),特别是在内容发展迅速的生命科学领域。如何将与教学相关的主题知识(SCK)最有效地纳入PD尚未得到调查。我们研究了一个由高中教师和科学家组成的专业学习社区如何共同设计一门生物科学课程,从而产生以sck为中心的PD。SCK是针对特定级别的,但教师无法单独生成SCK。与科学家共同设计SCK对教师来说是有价值的,他们对PD的认知和态度属性显著增加,从而促进了实践的改变和学生的学习收获,无论是在最初的合作伙伴关系内部还是外部。令人惊讶的是,对合作者如何互动的社会网络分析显示,尽管网络在认知和有效上是稳健的,但对于这样一个高功能的伙伴关系,它在行为上比预期的要稀疏得多,这与普遍接受的PD最佳实践相反。我们认为,在分布式领导的背景下,那些有意促进合作的科学家/教育家促进者能够消除无关的互动,优化过程。结果进一步证明,发展与21世纪生命科学相关的以内容为中心的PD需要拆除科学从业者与教学之间的制度化隔离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collaborative Curriculum Design as a Framework for Designing Teacher Professional Development that Produces the Content Knowledge for Teaching the Life Sciences.

Effective science teaching critically requires content focused professional development (PD), particularly in life sciences where content evolves rapidly. How subject matter knowledge related to teaching (SCK) is most effectively incorporated into PD has not been investigated. We studied how a professional learning community of high school teachers and scientists co-designing a bioscience curriculum produced the accompanying SCK-focused PD. SCK was level-specific but teachers could not generate it alone. Co-designing SCK with scientists was valuable to teachers, as evidenced by significant increases in their cognitive and attitudinal attributes toward the PD, in turn promoting change in practice and student learning gains, both within and outside the initial partnership. Surprisingly, social network analysis of how the collaborators interacted revealed that though the network was cognitively and effectively robust, it was behaviorally much sparser than anticipated for such a high functioning partnership, counter to commonly accepted PD best practices. We suggest that the scientist/educator facilitators who intentionally promoted collaboration in the context of distributed leadership were able to eliminate extraneous interactions, optimizing the process. The results are further evidence that developing content-focused PD relevant to 21st century life sciences requires dismantling the institutionalized segregation between practitioners of science and teaching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and Evaluation of Integrated Diabetes Curricula for Teaching Gene by Environment Concepts to High School Health and Biology Students. NeuroLab 2.0: An Alternative Storyline Design Approach for Translating a Research-Based Summer Experience into an Advanced STEM+M Curriculum Unit that Supports Three-Dimensional Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. A Creative Communication Partnership to Promote Curricula Dissemination on Social Media. Promoting Diversity in the Biomedical Sciences with the Teen Science Ambassador Program. A Feasibility Study Describing the Successes and Challenges of Implementing a Virtual Community Health Worker Training Among High School Students Participating in a Summer STEM Enrichment Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1