在欧洲进行的一项试点研究:从给药的lipegfilgrastim患者的医疗图表抽象的处方模式。

IF 2.4 Journal of Drug Assessment Pub Date : 2019-05-03 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21556660.2019.1604376
Sigal Kaplan, Nicole Lang, Maja Gasparic, Carolyn Rainville, George Haralabopoulos, Emanuele Borroni
{"title":"在欧洲进行的一项试点研究:从给药的lipegfilgrastim患者的医疗图表抽象的处方模式。","authors":"Sigal Kaplan,&nbsp;Nicole Lang,&nbsp;Maja Gasparic,&nbsp;Carolyn Rainville,&nbsp;George Haralabopoulos,&nbsp;Emanuele Borroni","doi":"10.1080/21556660.2019.1604376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The objective of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility of conducting a drug utilization study of lipegfilgrastim in Europe using medical records and to examine the pattern of lipegfilgrastim on-label and off-label use. <b>Methods:</b> Data on lipegfilgrastim use between September 2014 and April 2017 were abstracted from medical records by two independent medical abstractors. Lipegfilgrastim indication was categorized either as on-label or as one of four types of off-label (I-IV) according to pre-defined criteria. An inter-rater reliability analysis was conducted to measure the degree of abstractor agreement for on-label and off-label use. <b>Results:</b> Information from 46 medical records was abstracted. Lipegfilgrastim use during the first chemotherapy treatment cycle was mostly indicated for prevention of neutropenia (82.6% of patients). On-label use was documented in 42 patients (91.3%), while off-label use was documented in two patients (4.3%); all events of off-label use were attributed to use with non-cytotoxic drugs. The remaining two patients (4.3%) had missing data. Overall agreement between the abstractors was high (91.6%). For three types (Types I-III) of off-label use, the kappa values suggested a perfect agreement (<i>κ</i> = 1). For Type IV off-label use (use in patients treated with non-cytotoxic drugs), <i>κ</i> = 0, suggesting a poor agreement. <b>Conclusions:</b> While recruitment was challenging, the results of this pilot study confirm the feasibility and availability of medical records and the use of pharmacists as abstractors to assess on- and off-label use of lipegfilgrastim. Lipegfilgrastim was mainly prescribed according to the approved indications.Key pointsFindings from this pilot study confirm the feasibility and availability of medical records and the use of pharmacists as abstractors to assess on-label and off-label use of lipegfilgrastim in routine clinical practice.Lipegfilgrastim was mainly prescribed according to the approved indications, and the proportion of off-label use was low.The high inter-rater agreement between the two abstractors suggests that one abstractor is sufficient for conducting chart abstraction of on- and off-label use.Additional data abstraction sources other than pharmacists will need to be identified to improve response rate and center recruitment.Findings from this pilot study are important for the successful planning and execution of subsequent drug utilization studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2019.1604376","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribing patterns from medical chart abstraction of patients administered lipegfilgrastim: a pilot study in Europe.\",\"authors\":\"Sigal Kaplan,&nbsp;Nicole Lang,&nbsp;Maja Gasparic,&nbsp;Carolyn Rainville,&nbsp;George Haralabopoulos,&nbsp;Emanuele Borroni\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21556660.2019.1604376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The objective of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility of conducting a drug utilization study of lipegfilgrastim in Europe using medical records and to examine the pattern of lipegfilgrastim on-label and off-label use. <b>Methods:</b> Data on lipegfilgrastim use between September 2014 and April 2017 were abstracted from medical records by two independent medical abstractors. Lipegfilgrastim indication was categorized either as on-label or as one of four types of off-label (I-IV) according to pre-defined criteria. An inter-rater reliability analysis was conducted to measure the degree of abstractor agreement for on-label and off-label use. <b>Results:</b> Information from 46 medical records was abstracted. Lipegfilgrastim use during the first chemotherapy treatment cycle was mostly indicated for prevention of neutropenia (82.6% of patients). On-label use was documented in 42 patients (91.3%), while off-label use was documented in two patients (4.3%); all events of off-label use were attributed to use with non-cytotoxic drugs. The remaining two patients (4.3%) had missing data. Overall agreement between the abstractors was high (91.6%). For three types (Types I-III) of off-label use, the kappa values suggested a perfect agreement (<i>κ</i> = 1). For Type IV off-label use (use in patients treated with non-cytotoxic drugs), <i>κ</i> = 0, suggesting a poor agreement. <b>Conclusions:</b> While recruitment was challenging, the results of this pilot study confirm the feasibility and availability of medical records and the use of pharmacists as abstractors to assess on- and off-label use of lipegfilgrastim. Lipegfilgrastim was mainly prescribed according to the approved indications.Key pointsFindings from this pilot study confirm the feasibility and availability of medical records and the use of pharmacists as abstractors to assess on-label and off-label use of lipegfilgrastim in routine clinical practice.Lipegfilgrastim was mainly prescribed according to the approved indications, and the proportion of off-label use was low.The high inter-rater agreement between the two abstractors suggests that one abstractor is sufficient for conducting chart abstraction of on- and off-label use.Additional data abstraction sources other than pharmacists will need to be identified to improve response rate and center recruitment.Findings from this pilot study are important for the successful planning and execution of subsequent drug utilization studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Drug Assessment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2019.1604376\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Drug Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1604376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2019.1604376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本试点研究的目的是探讨在欧洲利用医疗记录开展lipegfilgrastim药物利用研究的可行性,并检查lipegfilgrastim在标签上和标签外使用的模式。方法:2014年9月至2017年4月,由2名独立医学文摘人员从病历中提取lipegfilgrastim的使用数据。根据预先定义的标准,Lipegfilgrastim适应症被分类为标签内适应症或四种类型的标签外(I-IV)之一。进行了一项间信度分析,以衡量标签上和标签外使用的抽象同意程度。结果:从46份病历中提取信息。在第一个化疗周期使用利佩非格昔汀主要用于预防中性粒细胞减少症(82.6%的患者)。42例(91.3%)患者记录了标签内用药,2例(4.3%)患者记录了标签外用药;所有超说明书使用事件均归因于使用非细胞毒性药物。其余2例患者(4.3%)数据缺失。摘要作者之间的总体一致性很高(91.6%)。对于三种类型(I-III型)的超说明书使用,kappa值表明完全一致(κ = 1)。对于IV型超说明书使用(使用非细胞毒性药物治疗的患者),κ = 0,表明一致性较差。结论:虽然招募具有挑战性,但该试点研究的结果证实了医疗记录的可行性和可用性,以及药剂师作为评估lipegfilgrastim在标签上和标签外使用的摘要。利佩非格列亭主要根据批准的适应症开处方。该初步研究的结果证实了医疗记录的可行性和可用性,以及药剂师作为抽象者评估lipegfilgrastim在常规临床实践中的适应症和非适应症使用。Lipegfilgrastim主要按照已批准的适应症进行处方,超说明书使用比例较低。两个抽象器之间的高度一致性表明,一个抽象器足以进行标签上和标签外使用的图表抽象。需要确定药剂师以外的其他数据提取来源,以提高响应率和中心招聘。这项初步研究的结果对后续药物利用研究的成功规划和执行具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prescribing patterns from medical chart abstraction of patients administered lipegfilgrastim: a pilot study in Europe.

Purpose: The objective of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility of conducting a drug utilization study of lipegfilgrastim in Europe using medical records and to examine the pattern of lipegfilgrastim on-label and off-label use. Methods: Data on lipegfilgrastim use between September 2014 and April 2017 were abstracted from medical records by two independent medical abstractors. Lipegfilgrastim indication was categorized either as on-label or as one of four types of off-label (I-IV) according to pre-defined criteria. An inter-rater reliability analysis was conducted to measure the degree of abstractor agreement for on-label and off-label use. Results: Information from 46 medical records was abstracted. Lipegfilgrastim use during the first chemotherapy treatment cycle was mostly indicated for prevention of neutropenia (82.6% of patients). On-label use was documented in 42 patients (91.3%), while off-label use was documented in two patients (4.3%); all events of off-label use were attributed to use with non-cytotoxic drugs. The remaining two patients (4.3%) had missing data. Overall agreement between the abstractors was high (91.6%). For three types (Types I-III) of off-label use, the kappa values suggested a perfect agreement (κ = 1). For Type IV off-label use (use in patients treated with non-cytotoxic drugs), κ = 0, suggesting a poor agreement. Conclusions: While recruitment was challenging, the results of this pilot study confirm the feasibility and availability of medical records and the use of pharmacists as abstractors to assess on- and off-label use of lipegfilgrastim. Lipegfilgrastim was mainly prescribed according to the approved indications.Key pointsFindings from this pilot study confirm the feasibility and availability of medical records and the use of pharmacists as abstractors to assess on-label and off-label use of lipegfilgrastim in routine clinical practice.Lipegfilgrastim was mainly prescribed according to the approved indications, and the proportion of off-label use was low.The high inter-rater agreement between the two abstractors suggests that one abstractor is sufficient for conducting chart abstraction of on- and off-label use.Additional data abstraction sources other than pharmacists will need to be identified to improve response rate and center recruitment.Findings from this pilot study are important for the successful planning and execution of subsequent drug utilization studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Assessment
Journal of Drug Assessment PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews. Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses. Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea. A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in an Arab population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1