联邦民事诉讼规则,电子健康记录,以及电子证据开示的挑战。

Journal of law and health Pub Date : 2015-01-01
Terrance K Byrne
{"title":"联邦民事诉讼规则,电子健康记录,以及电子证据开示的挑战。","authors":"Terrance K Byrne","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Byrne argues that disparities among different courts' interpretations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure amendments have caused confusion for those in law and healthcare. Additional amendments to the FRCP are necessary to provide clarity, especially in the area of healthcare electronic discovery. Specifically, future amendments should include: 1. Enforcing the \"Meet and Confer\" process, especially as related to e-discovery and ESI 2. Clear specification about when the duty to preserve information begins 3. Delineating reasonable and consistent standards for production of information 4. Outlining the details for when sanctions for failing to retain ESI are appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":73804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of law and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Electronic Health Records, and the Challenge of Electronic Discovery.\",\"authors\":\"Terrance K Byrne\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Byrne argues that disparities among different courts' interpretations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure amendments have caused confusion for those in law and healthcare. Additional amendments to the FRCP are necessary to provide clarity, especially in the area of healthcare electronic discovery. Specifically, future amendments should include: 1. Enforcing the \\\"Meet and Confer\\\" process, especially as related to e-discovery and ESI 2. Clear specification about when the duty to preserve information begins 3. Delineating reasonable and consistent standards for production of information 4. Outlining the details for when sanctions for failing to retain ESI are appropriate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of law and health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of law and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of law and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伯恩认为,不同法院对《联邦民事诉讼规则》修正案的解释存在差异,这给法律和医疗保健领域的人士造成了困惑。有必要对FRCP进行额外修订,以提供清晰度,特别是在医疗保健电子发现领域。具体来说,未来的修订应包括:执行“会面和协商”流程,特别是与电子发现和ESI 2相关的流程。明确规定信息保全义务何时开始为信息的产生制定合理和一致的标准概述对未能保留ESI的处罚何时合适的细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Electronic Health Records, and the Challenge of Electronic Discovery.

Byrne argues that disparities among different courts' interpretations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure amendments have caused confusion for those in law and healthcare. Additional amendments to the FRCP are necessary to provide clarity, especially in the area of healthcare electronic discovery. Specifically, future amendments should include: 1. Enforcing the "Meet and Confer" process, especially as related to e-discovery and ESI 2. Clear specification about when the duty to preserve information begins 3. Delineating reasonable and consistent standards for production of information 4. Outlining the details for when sanctions for failing to retain ESI are appropriate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ninth Amendment: An Underutilized Protection for Reproductive Choice. Distorted Burden Shifting and Barred Mitigation: Being a Stubborn 234 Years Old Ironically Hasn't Helped the Supreme Court Mature. How Bodily Autonomy Can Fail Against Vaccination Mandates: The Few vs. the Many. When Governors Prioritize Individual Freedom over Public Health: Tort Liability for Government Failures. Without Due Process of Law: The Dobbs Decision and Its Cataclysmic Impact on the Substantive Due Process and Privacy Rights of Ohio Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1