性格对平日坐着时间变化的影响:横断面与前瞻性评估。

Journal of lifestyle medicine Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-01-31 DOI:10.15280/jlm.2019.9.1.60
Chelsea Joyner, Stuart J H Biddle, Paul D Loprinzi
{"title":"性格对平日坐着时间变化的影响:横断面与前瞻性评估。","authors":"Chelsea Joyner,&nbsp;Stuart J H Biddle,&nbsp;Paul D Loprinzi","doi":"10.15280/jlm.2019.9.1.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the prospective association of personality typology on changes in sitting (sedentary) time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Young adults (N = 126; M<sub>age</sub> = 21.6 yrs) completed self-report assessments of personality and sitting time at baseline and at an approximate 5-month follow-up. At baseline, personality was assessed via the Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) questionnaire. At both baseline and the follow- up period, sitting time was self-reported using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both extraversion (<i>β</i> = -5.8; 95% CI: -11.7, 0.21; p = 0.05) and conscientiousness (<i>β</i> = -5.7; 95% CI: -11.3, -0.2; p = 0.04) were inversely associated with baseline sitting time. Regarding the prospective results, the only personality trait associated with changes in sitting time was openness to experience. Independent of changes in physical activity as well as other potential confounders, for every 1 unit increase in openness to experience, there was an associated 6.6 min/day increased change score in sitting time over the 5-month follow-up period (<i>β</i> = 6.6; 95% CI: 0.13, 13.0; p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Personality was differentially associated with sitting time based on the study design, with the personality trait of openness to experience being prospectively associated with increases in sitting time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lifestyle medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"60-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15280/jlm.2019.9.1.60","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Personality on Changes in Weekday Sitting Time: Cross-Sectional and Prospective Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea Joyner,&nbsp;Stuart J H Biddle,&nbsp;Paul D Loprinzi\",\"doi\":\"10.15280/jlm.2019.9.1.60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the prospective association of personality typology on changes in sitting (sedentary) time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Young adults (N = 126; M<sub>age</sub> = 21.6 yrs) completed self-report assessments of personality and sitting time at baseline and at an approximate 5-month follow-up. At baseline, personality was assessed via the Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) questionnaire. At both baseline and the follow- up period, sitting time was self-reported using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both extraversion (<i>β</i> = -5.8; 95% CI: -11.7, 0.21; p = 0.05) and conscientiousness (<i>β</i> = -5.7; 95% CI: -11.3, -0.2; p = 0.04) were inversely associated with baseline sitting time. Regarding the prospective results, the only personality trait associated with changes in sitting time was openness to experience. Independent of changes in physical activity as well as other potential confounders, for every 1 unit increase in openness to experience, there was an associated 6.6 min/day increased change score in sitting time over the 5-month follow-up period (<i>β</i> = 6.6; 95% CI: 0.13, 13.0; p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Personality was differentially associated with sitting time based on the study design, with the personality trait of openness to experience being prospectively associated with increases in sitting time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of lifestyle medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"60-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15280/jlm.2019.9.1.60\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of lifestyle medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15280/jlm.2019.9.1.60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lifestyle medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15280/jlm.2019.9.1.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是研究人格类型与坐(久坐)时间变化的潜在关联。方法:青壮年(N = 126;在基线和大约5个月的随访中完成了人格和坐着时间的自我报告评估。基线时,通过神经质-外向性-开放性五因素量表(NEO-FFI)评估人格。在基线和随访期间,坐着的时间使用国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ)简短形式自我报告。结果:两种外向性(β = -5.8;95% ci: -11.7, 0.21;P = 0.05)和责任心(β = -5.7;95% ci: -11.3, -0.2;P = 0.04)与基线坐着时间呈负相关。关于预期结果,唯一与坐着时间变化相关的人格特征是对经验的开放性。独立于身体活动的变化以及其他潜在的混淆因素,在5个月的随访期间,经验开放性每增加1个单位,坐着时间的变化得分就会增加6.6分钟/天(β = 6.6;95% ci: 0.13, 13.0;P = 0.04)。结论:根据研究设计,性格与久坐时间存在差异,开放性人格特质与久坐时间的增加可能存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Personality on Changes in Weekday Sitting Time: Cross-Sectional and Prospective Evaluation.

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the prospective association of personality typology on changes in sitting (sedentary) time.

Methods: Young adults (N = 126; Mage = 21.6 yrs) completed self-report assessments of personality and sitting time at baseline and at an approximate 5-month follow-up. At baseline, personality was assessed via the Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) questionnaire. At both baseline and the follow- up period, sitting time was self-reported using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form.

Results: Both extraversion (β = -5.8; 95% CI: -11.7, 0.21; p = 0.05) and conscientiousness (β = -5.7; 95% CI: -11.3, -0.2; p = 0.04) were inversely associated with baseline sitting time. Regarding the prospective results, the only personality trait associated with changes in sitting time was openness to experience. Independent of changes in physical activity as well as other potential confounders, for every 1 unit increase in openness to experience, there was an associated 6.6 min/day increased change score in sitting time over the 5-month follow-up period (β = 6.6; 95% CI: 0.13, 13.0; p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Personality was differentially associated with sitting time based on the study design, with the personality trait of openness to experience being prospectively associated with increases in sitting time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adjunctive Approach to Therapeutic Laser and Exercise Therapies in Alleviating Pain and Disability in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. An Overview of the Naturopathic Medicine Protocol Used in Inpatient Yoga and Naturopathy Hospitals in India: The Prakriti Shakti Protocol. Cutting-Edge Methodological Guidance for Authors in Conducting the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke Rehabilitation in India: Addressing Gender Inequities. The Indian Geriatrics Quality of Life Inventory Scale (IGQOLI): Development and Validation of a Scale to Evaluate the Quality of Life among Geriatric Population of India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1