不同曝气扩散器生物膜的DNA提取效率及可重复性比较。

IF 1.2 Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-24 DOI:10.1159/000500875
Pitiporn Asvapathanagul, Manel Garrido-Baserba, Betty H Olson, Hee-Deung Park, Deqiang Chen, Diego Rosso
{"title":"不同曝气扩散器生物膜的DNA提取效率及可重复性比较。","authors":"Pitiporn Asvapathanagul,&nbsp;Manel Garrido-Baserba,&nbsp;Betty H Olson,&nbsp;Hee-Deung Park,&nbsp;Deqiang Chen,&nbsp;Diego Rosso","doi":"10.1159/000500875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An existing bead-beating DNA extraction protocol was employed to compare the DNA extraction recovery and fragment quality of 6 different aeration diffuser biofilms. Escherichia coli, Gordonia amarae, and mixed liquor were used as controls. The fraction of total DNAbiofilm decreased monotonically with increasing number of beat beatings (BB) when the amount of DNA present was sufficient (>4 μgDNA/cm2), excluding the ceramic disk. While controls required only 2 BBs, 3 out of 5 BBs achieved ≥70% of total DNA (70.3 ± 1.7%) for 5 out of 6 biofilms. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses of 353 and 1,505 basepair (bp) amplicons from pure culture extracts showed target copy numbers were not degraded for the first 2 BBs, but the third BB decreased amplicon concentrations by 0.65 and 1.12 log for E. coli, and 0.39 and 0.40 log for G. amarae, respectively. The 353 bp fragment amplification from biofilm samples showed minimal degradation for the first 3 BBs. PCR and gel electrophoresis confirmed integrity of amplified 1,505 bp DNA fragments over the 5 BBs, except in the EDPM (75 mm diameter, tube) diffuser biofilm (4.98 ± 0.62 μgDNA/cm2). Taken together, this study showed type of diffuser membrane biofilms had no effects on extraction efficiency, but low DNA concentrations reduced extraction performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000500875","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of DNA Extraction Efficiency and Reproducibility of Different Aeration Diffuser Biofilms Using Bead-Beating Protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Pitiporn Asvapathanagul,&nbsp;Manel Garrido-Baserba,&nbsp;Betty H Olson,&nbsp;Hee-Deung Park,&nbsp;Deqiang Chen,&nbsp;Diego Rosso\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000500875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An existing bead-beating DNA extraction protocol was employed to compare the DNA extraction recovery and fragment quality of 6 different aeration diffuser biofilms. Escherichia coli, Gordonia amarae, and mixed liquor were used as controls. The fraction of total DNAbiofilm decreased monotonically with increasing number of beat beatings (BB) when the amount of DNA present was sufficient (>4 μgDNA/cm2), excluding the ceramic disk. While controls required only 2 BBs, 3 out of 5 BBs achieved ≥70% of total DNA (70.3 ± 1.7%) for 5 out of 6 biofilms. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses of 353 and 1,505 basepair (bp) amplicons from pure culture extracts showed target copy numbers were not degraded for the first 2 BBs, but the third BB decreased amplicon concentrations by 0.65 and 1.12 log for E. coli, and 0.39 and 0.40 log for G. amarae, respectively. The 353 bp fragment amplification from biofilm samples showed minimal degradation for the first 3 BBs. PCR and gel electrophoresis confirmed integrity of amplified 1,505 bp DNA fragments over the 5 BBs, except in the EDPM (75 mm diameter, tube) diffuser biofilm (4.98 ± 0.62 μgDNA/cm2). Taken together, this study showed type of diffuser membrane biofilms had no effects on extraction efficiency, but low DNA concentrations reduced extraction performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000500875\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

采用现有的打珠DNA提取方案,比较6种不同曝气扩散器生物膜的DNA提取回收率和片段质量。以大肠杆菌、金黄色戈登菌和混合液为对照。当DNA存在量足够(>4 μgDNA/cm2)时,除陶瓷片外,总DNA生物膜的比例随节拍次数的增加而单调下降。而对照组只需要2个BBs, 5个BBs中有3个在6个生物膜中的5个中达到总DNA的≥70%(70.3±1.7%)。对353个和1505个碱基对(bp)扩增子进行定量PCR分析,结果表明,前2个BB的目标拷贝数没有降低,但第3个BB的扩增子浓度分别降低了大肠杆菌的0.65和1.12 log,而G. amarae的扩增子浓度分别降低了0.39和0.40 log。生物膜样品的353 bp片段扩增显示前3个BBs的降解最小。PCR和凝胶电泳证实,除了EDPM(直径75 mm,管)扩散生物膜(4.98±0.62 μgDNA/cm2)外,5个BBs上扩增的1,505 bp DNA片段完整。综上所述,本研究表明扩散膜生物膜类型对提取效率没有影响,但低DNA浓度降低了提取性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of DNA Extraction Efficiency and Reproducibility of Different Aeration Diffuser Biofilms Using Bead-Beating Protocol.

An existing bead-beating DNA extraction protocol was employed to compare the DNA extraction recovery and fragment quality of 6 different aeration diffuser biofilms. Escherichia coli, Gordonia amarae, and mixed liquor were used as controls. The fraction of total DNAbiofilm decreased monotonically with increasing number of beat beatings (BB) when the amount of DNA present was sufficient (>4 μgDNA/cm2), excluding the ceramic disk. While controls required only 2 BBs, 3 out of 5 BBs achieved ≥70% of total DNA (70.3 ± 1.7%) for 5 out of 6 biofilms. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses of 353 and 1,505 basepair (bp) amplicons from pure culture extracts showed target copy numbers were not degraded for the first 2 BBs, but the third BB decreased amplicon concentrations by 0.65 and 1.12 log for E. coli, and 0.39 and 0.40 log for G. amarae, respectively. The 353 bp fragment amplification from biofilm samples showed minimal degradation for the first 3 BBs. PCR and gel electrophoresis confirmed integrity of amplified 1,505 bp DNA fragments over the 5 BBs, except in the EDPM (75 mm diameter, tube) diffuser biofilm (4.98 ± 0.62 μgDNA/cm2). Taken together, this study showed type of diffuser membrane biofilms had no effects on extraction efficiency, but low DNA concentrations reduced extraction performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology
Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: We are entering a new and exciting era of microbiological study and application. Recent advances in the now established disciplines of genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics, together with extensive cooperation between academic and industrial concerns have brought about an integration of basic and applied microbiology as never before.
期刊最新文献
Contents Front & Back Matter The Life Cycle of Dictyostelium discoideum Is Accelerated via MAP Kinase Cascade by a Culture Extract Produced by a Synthetic Microbial Consortium A Riboflavin Transporter in Bdellovibrio exovorous JSS Front & Back Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1