芬兰基于护士专业人员描述的循证实践。

Arja Holopainen, Hannele Siltanen, Annukka Tuomikoski, Sonja Tuomisto, Heidi Parisod
{"title":"芬兰基于护士专业人员描述的循证实践。","authors":"Arja Holopainen,&nbsp;Hannele Siltanen,&nbsp;Annukka Tuomikoski,&nbsp;Sonja Tuomisto,&nbsp;Heidi Parisod","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Evidence-based practices (EBPs) seek to promote the implementation of interventions that are effective, appropriate, feasible and meaningful for patients. The current demand for updated EBPs in Finland is shaped by national legislation. This study's aim was to describe nurses', nurse directors' and clinical nurse specialists' (CNSs') perceptions of how well EBPs are being implemented in nursing in Finland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quantitative descriptive study, the data were collected with an e-questionnaire distributed in Finland in 2017 and analysed using descriptive statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1063 nurses and 340 nurse directors and CNSs participated. The majority of nurses (64%, n = 669) reported that evidence is not clearly used to develop clinical practices. Most nurses (67%, n = 702) and over half of nurse directors and CNSs (57%, n = 184) also observed that knowledge of evidence-based protocols is not widespread within their organizations. However, 39% of nurses (n = 407) and 53% of nurse directors and CNSs (n = 171) stated that they are developing EBPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that nurses need more support to implement EBPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55996,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000181","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based practices in Finland based on nurse professionals' descriptions.\",\"authors\":\"Arja Holopainen,&nbsp;Hannele Siltanen,&nbsp;Annukka Tuomikoski,&nbsp;Sonja Tuomisto,&nbsp;Heidi Parisod\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Evidence-based practices (EBPs) seek to promote the implementation of interventions that are effective, appropriate, feasible and meaningful for patients. The current demand for updated EBPs in Finland is shaped by national legislation. This study's aim was to describe nurses', nurse directors' and clinical nurse specialists' (CNSs') perceptions of how well EBPs are being implemented in nursing in Finland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quantitative descriptive study, the data were collected with an e-questionnaire distributed in Finland in 2017 and analysed using descriptive statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1063 nurses and 340 nurse directors and CNSs participated. The majority of nurses (64%, n = 669) reported that evidence is not clearly used to develop clinical practices. Most nurses (67%, n = 702) and over half of nurse directors and CNSs (57%, n = 184) also observed that knowledge of evidence-based protocols is not widespread within their organizations. However, 39% of nurses (n = 407) and 53% of nurse directors and CNSs (n = 171) stated that they are developing EBPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that nurses need more support to implement EBPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000181\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:循证实践(ebp)旨在促进对患者有效、适当、可行和有意义的干预措施的实施。目前芬兰对更新ebp的需求是由国家立法决定的。本研究的目的是描述护士,护士主任和临床护理专家(CNSs)对芬兰护理实施ebp的看法。方法:本定量描述性研究采用2017年在芬兰发放的电子问卷收集数据,并采用描述性统计方法进行分析。结果:共有1063名护士、340名护士长和护士参与。大多数护士(64%,n = 669)报告说,证据没有明确用于发展临床实践。大多数护士(67%,n = 702)和超过一半的护理主任和护士(57%,n = 184)还观察到,基于证据的协议知识在其组织内并不普遍。然而,39%的护士(n = 407)和53%的护士主任和护士中心(n = 171)表示他们正在制定ebp。结论:护理人员在实施ebp时需要更多的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidence-based practices in Finland based on nurse professionals' descriptions.

Aim: Evidence-based practices (EBPs) seek to promote the implementation of interventions that are effective, appropriate, feasible and meaningful for patients. The current demand for updated EBPs in Finland is shaped by national legislation. This study's aim was to describe nurses', nurse directors' and clinical nurse specialists' (CNSs') perceptions of how well EBPs are being implemented in nursing in Finland.

Methods: In this quantitative descriptive study, the data were collected with an e-questionnaire distributed in Finland in 2017 and analysed using descriptive statistical methods.

Results: A total of 1063 nurses and 340 nurse directors and CNSs participated. The majority of nurses (64%, n = 669) reported that evidence is not clearly used to develop clinical practices. Most nurses (67%, n = 702) and over half of nurse directors and CNSs (57%, n = 184) also observed that knowledge of evidence-based protocols is not widespread within their organizations. However, 39% of nurses (n = 407) and 53% of nurse directors and CNSs (n = 171) stated that they are developing EBPs.

Conclusion: The results indicate that nurses need more support to implement EBPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: ​​The International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare is the official journal of the Joanna Briggs Institute. It is a fully refereed journal that publishes manuscripts relating to evidence-based medicine and evidence-based practice. It publishes papers containing reliable evidence to assist health professionals in their evaluation and decision-making, and to inform health professionals, students and researchers of outcomes, debates and developments in evidence-based medicine and healthcare. ​ The journal provides a unique home for publication of systematic reviews (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, economic, scoping and prevalence) and implementation projects including the synthesis, transfer and utilisation of evidence in clinical practice. Original scholarly work relating to the synthesis (translation science), transfer (distribution) and utilization (implementation science and evaluation) of evidence to inform multidisciplinary healthcare practice is considered for publication. The journal also publishes original scholarly commentary pieces relating to the generation and synthesis of evidence for practice and quality improvement, the use and evaluation of evidence in practice, and the process of conducting systematic reviews (methodology) which covers quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, economic, scoping and prevalence methods. In addition, the journal’s content includes implementation projects including the transfer and utilisation of evidence in clinical practice as well as providing a forum for the debate of issues surrounding evidence-based healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Quality of reporting in abstracts of clinical trials using physical activity interventions: a cross-sectional analysis using the CONSORT for Abstracts Perceived impact of a one-week journalology training course on scientific reporting competencies: prospective survey Artificial intelligence in health and science: an introspection A relação entre linguagem e práticas pseudocientíficas Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus among individuals with chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1