患者对新型青光眼药物给药途径的态度。

Q3 Medicine Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO Pub Date : 2018-09-30 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.5693/djo.01.2018.07.001
Benjamin B Wang, Michael M Lin, Thuan Nguyen, Angela V Turalba
{"title":"患者对新型青光眼药物给药途径的态度。","authors":"Benjamin B Wang,&nbsp;Michael M Lin,&nbsp;Thuan Nguyen,&nbsp;Angela V Turalba","doi":"10.5693/djo.01.2018.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Understanding patients' attitudes toward novel therapeutic options can help guide providers in personalizing treatment regimens for glaucoma patients. This study aimed to determine factors associated with acceptance of new drug delivery options among glaucoma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 199 patient volunteers participated in an interviewer-administered survey from June to August 2016 at the Glaucoma Service of Massachusetts Eye and Ear. The questionnaire was designed to determine acceptance of 6 drug delivery approaches: (1) triple combination eye drop, (2) microdose eye spray, (3) drug-eluting contact lens, (4) drug-eluting periocular ring insert, (5) injectable subconjunctival drug insert, and (6) injectable anterior chamber implant. Other factors analyzed included self-reported demographics, disease severity, and prior ocular history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average respondent age was 63.2 ± 15.1 years; 48% were female. For approaches 1-6 listed above, overall acceptance rates were, respectively, 85%, 54%, 31%, 43%, 32%, and 30%. Patients with greater disease severity and prior incisional glaucoma surgery were more likely to pursue alternatives to traditional eye drops.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is limited acceptance of alternatives to traditional eye drop medications among glaucoma patients. Understanding motivating factors and potential barriers to patient acceptance of novel drug delivery approaches is important in how providers will incorporate these glaucoma treatment options into practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":38112,"journal":{"name":"Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO","volume":"24 2","pages":"16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380257/pdf/djo-18-031.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient attitudes toward novel glaucoma drug delivery approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin B Wang,&nbsp;Michael M Lin,&nbsp;Thuan Nguyen,&nbsp;Angela V Turalba\",\"doi\":\"10.5693/djo.01.2018.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Understanding patients' attitudes toward novel therapeutic options can help guide providers in personalizing treatment regimens for glaucoma patients. This study aimed to determine factors associated with acceptance of new drug delivery options among glaucoma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 199 patient volunteers participated in an interviewer-administered survey from June to August 2016 at the Glaucoma Service of Massachusetts Eye and Ear. The questionnaire was designed to determine acceptance of 6 drug delivery approaches: (1) triple combination eye drop, (2) microdose eye spray, (3) drug-eluting contact lens, (4) drug-eluting periocular ring insert, (5) injectable subconjunctival drug insert, and (6) injectable anterior chamber implant. Other factors analyzed included self-reported demographics, disease severity, and prior ocular history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average respondent age was 63.2 ± 15.1 years; 48% were female. For approaches 1-6 listed above, overall acceptance rates were, respectively, 85%, 54%, 31%, 43%, 32%, and 30%. Patients with greater disease severity and prior incisional glaucoma surgery were more likely to pursue alternatives to traditional eye drops.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is limited acceptance of alternatives to traditional eye drop medications among glaucoma patients. Understanding motivating factors and potential barriers to patient acceptance of novel drug delivery approaches is important in how providers will incorporate these glaucoma treatment options into practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"16-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380257/pdf/djo-18-031.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5693/djo.01.2018.07.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5693/djo.01.2018.07.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

目的:了解患者对新型治疗方案的态度,有助于指导青光眼患者的个性化治疗方案。本研究旨在确定青光眼患者接受新给药方案的相关因素。方法:2016年6月至8月,共有199名患者志愿者参加了马萨诸塞州眼耳青光眼服务中心的访谈式调查。问卷旨在确定6种给药方式的接受度:(1)三联滴眼液,(2)微剂量眼喷雾剂,(3)药物洗脱隐形眼镜,(4)药物洗脱眼周植入物,(5)可注射结膜下药物植入物,(6)可注射前房植入物。分析的其他因素包括自我报告的人口统计学、疾病严重程度和既往眼部病史。结果:平均年龄63.2±15.1岁;48%是女性。对于上述方法1-6,总体接受率分别为85%、54%、31%、43%、32%和30%。病情严重且既往有切口青光眼手术的患者更有可能寻求替代传统滴眼液。结论:青光眼患者对替代传统滴眼液药物的接受程度有限。了解患者接受新药物给药方法的激励因素和潜在障碍对于提供者如何将这些青光眼治疗方案纳入实践非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient attitudes toward novel glaucoma drug delivery approaches.

Purpose: Understanding patients' attitudes toward novel therapeutic options can help guide providers in personalizing treatment regimens for glaucoma patients. This study aimed to determine factors associated with acceptance of new drug delivery options among glaucoma patients.

Methods: A total of 199 patient volunteers participated in an interviewer-administered survey from June to August 2016 at the Glaucoma Service of Massachusetts Eye and Ear. The questionnaire was designed to determine acceptance of 6 drug delivery approaches: (1) triple combination eye drop, (2) microdose eye spray, (3) drug-eluting contact lens, (4) drug-eluting periocular ring insert, (5) injectable subconjunctival drug insert, and (6) injectable anterior chamber implant. Other factors analyzed included self-reported demographics, disease severity, and prior ocular history.

Results: The average respondent age was 63.2 ± 15.1 years; 48% were female. For approaches 1-6 listed above, overall acceptance rates were, respectively, 85%, 54%, 31%, 43%, 32%, and 30%. Patients with greater disease severity and prior incisional glaucoma surgery were more likely to pursue alternatives to traditional eye drops.

Conclusions: There is limited acceptance of alternatives to traditional eye drop medications among glaucoma patients. Understanding motivating factors and potential barriers to patient acceptance of novel drug delivery approaches is important in how providers will incorporate these glaucoma treatment options into practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO
Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Primary anaplastic extramedullary plasmacytoma in the lacrimal sac. A 22-year-old woman with alcoholic pancreatitis and bilateral central scotomata. Bilateral anterior lens capsule rupture in Alport syndrome: case series and literature review. Secondary glaucoma as a late complication of a primary iris stromal cyst. Excision of an intrascleral cyst guided by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1