与接受妇科小手术的未孕或初产妇相比,接受择期剖宫产手术的足月孕妇在麻醉前的胃容量估计。

Clinical medicine insights. Women's health Pub Date : 2019-03-14 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179562X19828372
Oren Gal, Mark Rotshtein, Dan Feldman, Amir Mari, Motti Hallak, Yael Kopelman
{"title":"与接受妇科小手术的未孕或初产妇相比,接受择期剖宫产手术的足月孕妇在麻醉前的胃容量估计。","authors":"Oren Gal, Mark Rotshtein, Dan Feldman, Amir Mari, Motti Hallak, Yael Kopelman","doi":"10.1177/1179562X19828372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, intubation of pregnant women has been performed using a rapid sequence induction. This is due to the classical concept that women with more than 18 weeks of pregnancy (mid-second trimester) are always considered to have an increased risk of aspiration due to a number of factors, regardless of the fasting duration. Rapid sequence induction is associated with a higher rate of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our study aimed to illuminate the hypothesis that there is no difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant women and non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures. Accordingly, we measured gastric volume and content before anesthesia in term-pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section, and to compare it with non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center prospective study, the gastric volume and content were assessed by abdominal ultrasound (AUS) just prior to the scheduled procedure. AUS was performed in the sagittal or para-sagittal plain in the upright position and the stomach content was estimated according to the antral circumferential area. Group 1 consisted of 50 term-pregnant women scheduled for cesarean section. Group 2 consisted of 45 non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were scheduled for minor gynecologic procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite significant longer fasting time prior to the interventional procedure in the non-pregnant or first-trimester women group, there was no significant difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant and first-trimester pregnant women (3.2 ± 0.97 cm<sup>2</sup> vs 3.2 ± 0.79 cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> = .97). Gastric volume was small in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fasting gastric volume before cesarean section in term-pregnant women is small and is not different than in non-pregnant or first-trimester women undergoing minor gynecologic procedures. Ultrasound estimation of gastric volume is a reliable and easy-to-perform technique which might help in decision-making regarding the airway management prior to induction of anesthesia in pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":90142,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1179562X19828372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/47/10.1177_1179562X19828372.PMC6419245.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Oren Gal, Mark Rotshtein, Dan Feldman, Amir Mari, Motti Hallak, Yael Kopelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179562X19828372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, intubation of pregnant women has been performed using a rapid sequence induction. This is due to the classical concept that women with more than 18 weeks of pregnancy (mid-second trimester) are always considered to have an increased risk of aspiration due to a number of factors, regardless of the fasting duration. Rapid sequence induction is associated with a higher rate of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our study aimed to illuminate the hypothesis that there is no difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant women and non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures. Accordingly, we measured gastric volume and content before anesthesia in term-pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section, and to compare it with non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center prospective study, the gastric volume and content were assessed by abdominal ultrasound (AUS) just prior to the scheduled procedure. AUS was performed in the sagittal or para-sagittal plain in the upright position and the stomach content was estimated according to the antral circumferential area. Group 1 consisted of 50 term-pregnant women scheduled for cesarean section. Group 2 consisted of 45 non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were scheduled for minor gynecologic procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite significant longer fasting time prior to the interventional procedure in the non-pregnant or first-trimester women group, there was no significant difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant and first-trimester pregnant women (3.2 ± 0.97 cm<sup>2</sup> vs 3.2 ± 0.79 cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> = .97). Gastric volume was small in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fasting gastric volume before cesarean section in term-pregnant women is small and is not different than in non-pregnant or first-trimester women undergoing minor gynecologic procedures. Ultrasound estimation of gastric volume is a reliable and easy-to-perform technique which might help in decision-making regarding the airway management prior to induction of anesthesia in pregnant women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1179562X19828372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/47/10.1177_1179562X19828372.PMC6419245.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179562X19828372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179562X19828372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统上,孕妇插管都是采用快速顺序诱导法。这是由于一种传统观念,即无论禁食时间长短,妊娠超过 18 周(妊娠中期)的妇女总是被认为因多种因素而增加了吸入风险。目的:我们的研究旨在阐明一个假设,即接受妇科小手术的足月妊娠妇女与非妊娠妇女或初产妇的胃容量没有差异。因此,我们测量了接受择期剖宫产手术的足月孕妇在麻醉前的胃容量和内容物,并将其与接受妇科小手术的未孕或初孕孕妇进行比较:在这项单中心前瞻性研究中,在预定手术前通过腹部超声波(AUS)对胃容量和内容物进行评估。腹部超声检查在直立位的矢状位或副矢状位平扫下进行,根据前胃周径面积估算胃容量。第一组包括 50 名计划进行剖宫产手术的足月孕妇。第 2 组包括 45 名计划进行妇科小手术的非孕妇或初孕妇:结果:尽管非孕妇或初产妇组在介入手术前禁食时间明显更长,但足月孕妇和初产妇的胃容量没有明显差异(3.2 ± 0.97 cm2 vs 3.2 ± 0.79 cm2;P = .97)。两组孕妇的胃容量都很小:结论:足月孕妇在剖腹产前的空腹胃容量较小,与接受妇科小手术的非孕妇或初产妇没有区别。超声估测胃容量是一种可靠且易于操作的技术,可帮助孕妇在麻醉诱导前对气道管理做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures.

Background: Traditionally, intubation of pregnant women has been performed using a rapid sequence induction. This is due to the classical concept that women with more than 18 weeks of pregnancy (mid-second trimester) are always considered to have an increased risk of aspiration due to a number of factors, regardless of the fasting duration. Rapid sequence induction is associated with a higher rate of adverse events.

Aims: Our study aimed to illuminate the hypothesis that there is no difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant women and non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures. Accordingly, we measured gastric volume and content before anesthesia in term-pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section, and to compare it with non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures.

Methods: In this single-center prospective study, the gastric volume and content were assessed by abdominal ultrasound (AUS) just prior to the scheduled procedure. AUS was performed in the sagittal or para-sagittal plain in the upright position and the stomach content was estimated according to the antral circumferential area. Group 1 consisted of 50 term-pregnant women scheduled for cesarean section. Group 2 consisted of 45 non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were scheduled for minor gynecologic procedure.

Results: Despite significant longer fasting time prior to the interventional procedure in the non-pregnant or first-trimester women group, there was no significant difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant and first-trimester pregnant women (3.2 ± 0.97 cm2 vs 3.2 ± 0.79 cm2; P = .97). Gastric volume was small in the two groups.

Conclusion: Fasting gastric volume before cesarean section in term-pregnant women is small and is not different than in non-pregnant or first-trimester women undergoing minor gynecologic procedures. Ultrasound estimation of gastric volume is a reliable and easy-to-perform technique which might help in decision-making regarding the airway management prior to induction of anesthesia in pregnant women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Associated With Development of Transient Low Back Pain During Prolonged Standing? A Protocol. The Impact of Preconceptional Multiple-Micronutrient Supplementation on Female Fertility. Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures. Structural Racism and Severe Maternal Morbidity in New York State A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin-A in the Management of Dysfunctional Voiding in Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1