Miriam Ting, Robert J Faulkner, David P Donatelli, Jon B Suzuki
{"title":"牙对种植体支持的固定局部义齿:系统综述的综合概述。","authors":"Miriam Ting, Robert J Faulkner, David P Donatelli, Jon B Suzuki","doi":"10.1097/ID.0000000000000901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tooth-to-implant-connected prostheses have been described as a possible treatment option for patients with long-span edentulous situations that were not conducive for placement of an adequate number of supporting implants. In this comprehensive overview of systematic reviews, the incidence of complications and the long-term survival rates of tooth-to-implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) were evaluated to determine whether it is a viable treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of 5 electronic databases was conducted for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of tooth-to-implant-supported FPDs up to January 2017. The articles were AMSTAR rated for methodological quality, and low-quality articles were eliminated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 369 reviews in PubMed, 248 in Web of Science, 49 in EMBASE, 63 in Cochrane Library, and 27 in Google Scholar. After removal of duplicates and after full-text analysis, 5 were selected for the overview.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this overview, it was concluded that (1) the 10-year survival rates for tooth-to-implant FPDs were lower than the 5-year survival rates, (2) the tooth-to-implant FPDs' survival was lower than the individual abutment tooth or implant supporting it, (3) the biological and technical complications were more at 10 years compared with 5 years, and (4) the intrusion of the abutment teeth was more in the nonrigid connection FPDs than the rigid connection FPDs. Therefore, tooth-to-implant FPDs are a viable option but should be considered secondary to other available options with higher long-term survival rates and lower complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13309,"journal":{"name":"Implant Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000901","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tooth-to-Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Denture: A Comprehensive Overview of Systematic Reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Ting, Robert J Faulkner, David P Donatelli, Jon B Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ID.0000000000000901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tooth-to-implant-connected prostheses have been described as a possible treatment option for patients with long-span edentulous situations that were not conducive for placement of an adequate number of supporting implants. In this comprehensive overview of systematic reviews, the incidence of complications and the long-term survival rates of tooth-to-implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) were evaluated to determine whether it is a viable treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of 5 electronic databases was conducted for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of tooth-to-implant-supported FPDs up to January 2017. The articles were AMSTAR rated for methodological quality, and low-quality articles were eliminated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 369 reviews in PubMed, 248 in Web of Science, 49 in EMBASE, 63 in Cochrane Library, and 27 in Google Scholar. After removal of duplicates and after full-text analysis, 5 were selected for the overview.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this overview, it was concluded that (1) the 10-year survival rates for tooth-to-implant FPDs were lower than the 5-year survival rates, (2) the tooth-to-implant FPDs' survival was lower than the individual abutment tooth or implant supporting it, (3) the biological and technical complications were more at 10 years compared with 5 years, and (4) the intrusion of the abutment teeth was more in the nonrigid connection FPDs than the rigid connection FPDs. Therefore, tooth-to-implant FPDs are a viable option but should be considered secondary to other available options with higher long-term survival rates and lower complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000901\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000901\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
目的:牙与种植体连接的假体已被描述为一种可能的治疗选择,用于患者的大跨度无牙情况,不利于放置足够数量的支持种植体。在这篇全面的系统综述中,评估了并发症的发生率和牙-种植支撑固定局部义齿(fpd)的长期存活率,以确定它是否是一种可行的治疗方法。材料和方法:系统检索5个电子数据库,对截至2017年1月的牙齿-种植体支持fpd进行系统综述和荟萃分析。这些文章的方法学质量被AMSTAR评定,低质量的文章被淘汰。结果:最初的搜索在PubMed中获得369篇评论,在Web of Science中获得248篇,在EMBASE中获得49篇,在Cochrane Library中获得63篇,在Google Scholar中获得27篇。在删除重复并进行全文分析后,选择了5个进行概述。结论:在本文的局限性,得出(1)的10年生存率tooth-to-implant fpd低于5年存活率,(2)tooth-to-implant fpd的存活率低于个人桥台牙齿或植入支持它,(3)生物技术并发症更10年和5年相比,和(4)桥台的侵入牙齿更非刚性连接的火焰比火焰刚性连接。因此,牙-种植体fpd是一种可行的选择,但应考虑为其他可行的选择,具有更高的长期存活率和更低的并发症。
Tooth-to-Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Denture: A Comprehensive Overview of Systematic Reviews.
Objectives: Tooth-to-implant-connected prostheses have been described as a possible treatment option for patients with long-span edentulous situations that were not conducive for placement of an adequate number of supporting implants. In this comprehensive overview of systematic reviews, the incidence of complications and the long-term survival rates of tooth-to-implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) were evaluated to determine whether it is a viable treatment.
Materials and methods: A systematic search of 5 electronic databases was conducted for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of tooth-to-implant-supported FPDs up to January 2017. The articles were AMSTAR rated for methodological quality, and low-quality articles were eliminated.
Results: The initial search yielded 369 reviews in PubMed, 248 in Web of Science, 49 in EMBASE, 63 in Cochrane Library, and 27 in Google Scholar. After removal of duplicates and after full-text analysis, 5 were selected for the overview.
Conclusions: Within the limitations of this overview, it was concluded that (1) the 10-year survival rates for tooth-to-implant FPDs were lower than the 5-year survival rates, (2) the tooth-to-implant FPDs' survival was lower than the individual abutment tooth or implant supporting it, (3) the biological and technical complications were more at 10 years compared with 5 years, and (4) the intrusion of the abutment teeth was more in the nonrigid connection FPDs than the rigid connection FPDs. Therefore, tooth-to-implant FPDs are a viable option but should be considered secondary to other available options with higher long-term survival rates and lower complications.
期刊介绍:
Cessation. Implant Dentistry, an interdisciplinary forum for general practitioners, specialists, educators, and researchers, publishes relevant clinical, educational, and research articles that document current concepts of oral implantology in sections on biomaterials, clinical reports, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral pathology, periodontics, prosthodontics, and research. The journal includes guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, abstracts of current literature, and news of sponsoring societies.