温盖特正向和反向厌氧试验的比较:简要技术说明。

Journal of lifestyle medicine Pub Date : 2019-07-01 Epub Date: 2019-07-31 DOI:10.15280/jlm.2019.9.2.132
Joseph Berning, Trish Gail Sevene, Mark DeBeliso, Carole Carson, Chad Harris, Mike Climstein, Kent Jason Adams
{"title":"温盖特正向和反向厌氧试验的比较:简要技术说明。","authors":"Joseph Berning,&nbsp;Trish Gail Sevene,&nbsp;Mark DeBeliso,&nbsp;Carole Carson,&nbsp;Chad Harris,&nbsp;Mike Climstein,&nbsp;Kent Jason Adams","doi":"10.15280/jlm.2019.9.2.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Wingate anaerobic test (WAT) is traditionally performed in the forward pedaling direction on a cycle ergometer. However, reverse (backward) pedaling during a WAT test may be a novel way to convey meaningful information related to performance and rehabilitation. This study compared peak power measurements between 30-second forward pedaling WAT (FWAT) with a 30-second reverse pedaling WAT (RWAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10 male and 10 female participants (age 27.6 ± 7.31 yrs, mass 74.9 ± 21.3 kg and height 172.6 ± 10.9 cm) volunteered to participate. Participants performed one FWAT and one RWAT at 7.5% of body mass on a specially modified Monark cycle ergometer. Tests were separated 2 days of rest. Peak power output (PPO), mean power output (MPO), relative PPO (RPPO), relative MPO (RMPO), fatigue index (%FI), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FWAT power measurements were all significantly greater (p < 0.05) than RWAT power measurements except MPO (p > 0.05); and that RPE was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in FWAT than RWAT. Specifically, FWAT vs. RWAT (M ± SD) are as follows: PPO watts (w) = 731.7 ± 237.1 vs. 529.6 ± 192.2; RPPO w/kg = 10.2 ± 2.3 vs. 7.2 ± 1.6; MPO w = 510.2 ± 162.1 vs. 415.1 ± 146.2; RMPO w/kg = 7.3 ± 1.5 vs. 5.8 ± 1.3; %FI = 49.2 ± 8.7 vs. 37.4 ± 13.7; and RPE = 19.4 ± 1.1 vs. 15.8 ± 1.5. Gender did not impact the relative differences in these relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Practitioners and clinicians may use this information to begin to understand the power and perceived exertion relationships of forward versus reverse pedaling during a WAT; exercise prescription for rehabilitation and performance may benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":73805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lifestyle medicine","volume":"9 2","pages":"132-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/cf/jlm-09-132.PMC6894445.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Forward and Reverse Wingate Anaerobic Tests: A Brief Technical Note.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Berning,&nbsp;Trish Gail Sevene,&nbsp;Mark DeBeliso,&nbsp;Carole Carson,&nbsp;Chad Harris,&nbsp;Mike Climstein,&nbsp;Kent Jason Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.15280/jlm.2019.9.2.132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Wingate anaerobic test (WAT) is traditionally performed in the forward pedaling direction on a cycle ergometer. However, reverse (backward) pedaling during a WAT test may be a novel way to convey meaningful information related to performance and rehabilitation. This study compared peak power measurements between 30-second forward pedaling WAT (FWAT) with a 30-second reverse pedaling WAT (RWAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10 male and 10 female participants (age 27.6 ± 7.31 yrs, mass 74.9 ± 21.3 kg and height 172.6 ± 10.9 cm) volunteered to participate. Participants performed one FWAT and one RWAT at 7.5% of body mass on a specially modified Monark cycle ergometer. Tests were separated 2 days of rest. Peak power output (PPO), mean power output (MPO), relative PPO (RPPO), relative MPO (RMPO), fatigue index (%FI), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FWAT power measurements were all significantly greater (p < 0.05) than RWAT power measurements except MPO (p > 0.05); and that RPE was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in FWAT than RWAT. Specifically, FWAT vs. RWAT (M ± SD) are as follows: PPO watts (w) = 731.7 ± 237.1 vs. 529.6 ± 192.2; RPPO w/kg = 10.2 ± 2.3 vs. 7.2 ± 1.6; MPO w = 510.2 ± 162.1 vs. 415.1 ± 146.2; RMPO w/kg = 7.3 ± 1.5 vs. 5.8 ± 1.3; %FI = 49.2 ± 8.7 vs. 37.4 ± 13.7; and RPE = 19.4 ± 1.1 vs. 15.8 ± 1.5. Gender did not impact the relative differences in these relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Practitioners and clinicians may use this information to begin to understand the power and perceived exertion relationships of forward versus reverse pedaling during a WAT; exercise prescription for rehabilitation and performance may benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of lifestyle medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"132-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/cf/jlm-09-132.PMC6894445.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of lifestyle medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15280/jlm.2019.9.2.132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lifestyle medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15280/jlm.2019.9.2.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:温盖特厌氧测试(WAT)传统上是在自行车测力计上向前踩踏板的方向进行的。然而,在WAT测试期间反向(向后)踩踏板可能是一种传达与性能和康复有关的有意义信息的新方法。这项研究比较了30秒正踩WAT (FWAT)和30秒反踩WAT (RWAT)的峰值功率测量值。方法:男性10名,女性10名,年龄27.6±7.31岁,体重74.9±21.3 kg,身高172.6±10.9 cm。参与者在一个特殊改装的Monark自行车测力计上,以7.5%的体重进行一次FWAT和一次RWAT。试验分开休息2天。测量峰值输出功率(PPO)、平均输出功率(MPO)、相对输出功率(RPPO)、相对输出功率(RMPO)、疲劳指数(%FI)和感知消耗等级(RPE)。结果:除MPO外,FWAT功率测量值均显著高于RWAT功率测量值(p < 0.05);wat组RPE显著高于RWAT组(p < 0.05)。具体而言,FWAT vs. RWAT (M±SD)如下:PPO瓦(w) = 731.7±237.1 vs. 529.6±192.2;RPPO w/kg = 10.2±2.3 vs. 7.2±1.6;MPO w = 510.2±162.1 vs. 415.1±146.2;RMPO w/kg = 7.3±1.5 vs. 5.8±1.3;%FI = 49.2±8.7 vs. 37.4±13.7;RPE = 19.4±1.1∶15.8±1.5。性别对这些关系中的相对差异没有影响。结论:从业者和临床医生可以使用这些信息来开始理解WAT期间向前和反向踏板的力量和感知用力关系;运动处方对康复和表现可能有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Forward and Reverse Wingate Anaerobic Tests: A Brief Technical Note.

Background: The Wingate anaerobic test (WAT) is traditionally performed in the forward pedaling direction on a cycle ergometer. However, reverse (backward) pedaling during a WAT test may be a novel way to convey meaningful information related to performance and rehabilitation. This study compared peak power measurements between 30-second forward pedaling WAT (FWAT) with a 30-second reverse pedaling WAT (RWAT).

Methods: 10 male and 10 female participants (age 27.6 ± 7.31 yrs, mass 74.9 ± 21.3 kg and height 172.6 ± 10.9 cm) volunteered to participate. Participants performed one FWAT and one RWAT at 7.5% of body mass on a specially modified Monark cycle ergometer. Tests were separated 2 days of rest. Peak power output (PPO), mean power output (MPO), relative PPO (RPPO), relative MPO (RMPO), fatigue index (%FI), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured.

Results: The FWAT power measurements were all significantly greater (p < 0.05) than RWAT power measurements except MPO (p > 0.05); and that RPE was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in FWAT than RWAT. Specifically, FWAT vs. RWAT (M ± SD) are as follows: PPO watts (w) = 731.7 ± 237.1 vs. 529.6 ± 192.2; RPPO w/kg = 10.2 ± 2.3 vs. 7.2 ± 1.6; MPO w = 510.2 ± 162.1 vs. 415.1 ± 146.2; RMPO w/kg = 7.3 ± 1.5 vs. 5.8 ± 1.3; %FI = 49.2 ± 8.7 vs. 37.4 ± 13.7; and RPE = 19.4 ± 1.1 vs. 15.8 ± 1.5. Gender did not impact the relative differences in these relationships.

Conclusion: Practitioners and clinicians may use this information to begin to understand the power and perceived exertion relationships of forward versus reverse pedaling during a WAT; exercise prescription for rehabilitation and performance may benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Gratitude on the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers as Measured by Burnout and Depression. Symposium Commemorating the 10th Anniversary of the Korean Society of Lifestyle Medicine. Association between Eating Disorders, Academic Stress with Menstrual Dysfunction among College Female Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Accelerated Muscle Strength Decline and Reduced Lean Mass in Adults with Treated Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A NHANES Study. Illuminating Insomnia: A Scientometric Exploration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Treatment Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1