IgA肾病患者的药物治疗:随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析

IF 3.2 Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Current clinical pharmacology Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1574884715666191223103914
Kannan Sridharan, Gowri Sivaramakrishnan
{"title":"IgA肾病患者的药物治疗:随机临床试验的网络荟萃分析","authors":"Kannan Sridharan,&nbsp;Gowri Sivaramakrishnan","doi":"10.2174/1574884715666191223103914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several drugs are used for treating IgA nephropathy (IgAN). We carried out a network meta-analysis evaluating these drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched for appropriate randomized clinical trials carried out in patients with IgAN. The primary outcome was proteinuria remission rates and there were several other secondary outcome measures. The risk of bias was assessed. Mixed treatment comparison estimates were modelled from direct and indirect comparison estimates. Grading of the evidence for key comparisons was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 51 in the metaanalysis. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, corticosteroids/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), ARB, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), ARB/ACEI, corticosteroids/ACEI and hypolipidemics/ ARB were observed with significantly higher rates of proteinuria remission than the standard of care. Several benefits were observed with other drugs on the secondary outcome measures. A very low grade was observed for the interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed a few interventions to perform better in the management of IgAN. The results of this study will aid in further evaluation of such drugs that may assist in saving the resources and time. However, the readers should interpret the findings with great caution as the results might change with the advent of future head-to-head clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10746,"journal":{"name":"Current clinical pharmacology","volume":"15 2","pages":"132-144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug Therapies for Patients with IgA Nephropathy: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Kannan Sridharan,&nbsp;Gowri Sivaramakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1574884715666191223103914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several drugs are used for treating IgA nephropathy (IgAN). We carried out a network meta-analysis evaluating these drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched for appropriate randomized clinical trials carried out in patients with IgAN. The primary outcome was proteinuria remission rates and there were several other secondary outcome measures. The risk of bias was assessed. Mixed treatment comparison estimates were modelled from direct and indirect comparison estimates. Grading of the evidence for key comparisons was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 51 in the metaanalysis. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, corticosteroids/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), ARB, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), ARB/ACEI, corticosteroids/ACEI and hypolipidemics/ ARB were observed with significantly higher rates of proteinuria remission than the standard of care. Several benefits were observed with other drugs on the secondary outcome measures. A very low grade was observed for the interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed a few interventions to perform better in the management of IgAN. The results of this study will aid in further evaluation of such drugs that may assist in saving the resources and time. However, the readers should interpret the findings with great caution as the results might change with the advent of future head-to-head clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"132-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884715666191223103914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884715666191223103914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:有几种药物用于治疗IgA肾病(IgAN)。我们对这些药物进行了网络荟萃分析。方法:在电子数据库中检索适合IgAN患者的随机临床试验。主要结果是蛋白尿缓解率,还有其他几个次要结果测量。评估偏倚风险。混合处理比较估计值由直接和间接比较估计值建模。对关键比较的证据进行分级。结果:系统评价纳入了57项临床试验,荟萃分析纳入了51项临床试验。多不饱和脂肪酸、皮质类固醇/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、ARB、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、ARB/ACEI、皮质类固醇/ACEI和低血脂/ ARB组的蛋白尿缓解率明显高于标准护理组。其他药物在次要结局指标上也有一些益处。观察到干预的评分很低。结论:我们观察到一些干预措施可以更好地治疗IgAN。本研究的结果将有助于进一步评价这类药物,从而有助于节省资源和时间。然而,读者应该非常谨慎地解释这些发现,因为结果可能会随着未来正面临床试验的到来而改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drug Therapies for Patients with IgA Nephropathy: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Background: Several drugs are used for treating IgA nephropathy (IgAN). We carried out a network meta-analysis evaluating these drugs.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched for appropriate randomized clinical trials carried out in patients with IgAN. The primary outcome was proteinuria remission rates and there were several other secondary outcome measures. The risk of bias was assessed. Mixed treatment comparison estimates were modelled from direct and indirect comparison estimates. Grading of the evidence for key comparisons was carried out.

Results: Fifty-seven clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 51 in the metaanalysis. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, corticosteroids/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), ARB, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), ARB/ACEI, corticosteroids/ACEI and hypolipidemics/ ARB were observed with significantly higher rates of proteinuria remission than the standard of care. Several benefits were observed with other drugs on the secondary outcome measures. A very low grade was observed for the interventions.

Conclusion: We observed a few interventions to perform better in the management of IgAN. The results of this study will aid in further evaluation of such drugs that may assist in saving the resources and time. However, the readers should interpret the findings with great caution as the results might change with the advent of future head-to-head clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current clinical pharmacology
Current clinical pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Current Clinical Pharmacology publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances in clinical pharmacology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles in the field. Topics covered include: pharmacokinetics; therapeutic trials; adverse drug reactions; drug interactions; drug metabolism; pharmacoepidemiology; and drug development. The journal is essential reading for all researchers in clinical pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Efficacy of Withania somnifera Root Extract in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo- Controlled Trial. Meet Our Editorial Board Member Comparative effectiveness of Agmatine and Choline treatment in rats with cognitive impairment induced by AlCl3 and Forced Swim Stress. Meet Our Associate Editorial Board Member Meet Our Editorial Board Member
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1