手指比例(2D:4D)和经济偏好:在330名女性的样本中没有明显的联系。

IF 1.9 Journal of the Economic Science Association Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-10-11 DOI:10.1007/s40881-019-00076-y
Elle Parslow, Eva Ranehill, Niklas Zethraeus, Liselott Blomberg, Bo von Schoultz, Angelica Lindén Hirschberg, Magnus Johannesson, Anna Dreber
{"title":"手指比例(2D:4D)和经济偏好:在330名女性的样本中没有明显的联系。","authors":"Elle Parslow,&nbsp;Eva Ranehill,&nbsp;Niklas Zethraeus,&nbsp;Liselott Blomberg,&nbsp;Bo von Schoultz,&nbsp;Angelica Lindén Hirschberg,&nbsp;Magnus Johannesson,&nbsp;Anna Dreber","doi":"10.1007/s40881-019-00076-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many studies report on the association between 2D:4D, a putative marker for prenatal testosterone exposure, and economic preferences. However, most of these studies have limited sample sizes and test multiple hypotheses (without preregistration). In this study we mainly replicate the common specifications found in the literature for the association between the 2D:4D ratio and risk taking, the willingness to compete, and dictator game giving separately. In a sample of 330 women we find no robust associations between any of these economic preferences and 2D:4D. We find no evidence of a statistically significant relation for 16 of the 18 total regressions we run. The two regression specifications which are statistically significant have not previously been reported and the associations are not in the expected direction, and therefore they are unlikely to represent a real effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":91563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40881-019-00076-y","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The digit ratio (2D:4D) and economic preferences: no robust associations in a sample of 330 women.\",\"authors\":\"Elle Parslow,&nbsp;Eva Ranehill,&nbsp;Niklas Zethraeus,&nbsp;Liselott Blomberg,&nbsp;Bo von Schoultz,&nbsp;Angelica Lindén Hirschberg,&nbsp;Magnus Johannesson,&nbsp;Anna Dreber\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40881-019-00076-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many studies report on the association between 2D:4D, a putative marker for prenatal testosterone exposure, and economic preferences. However, most of these studies have limited sample sizes and test multiple hypotheses (without preregistration). In this study we mainly replicate the common specifications found in the literature for the association between the 2D:4D ratio and risk taking, the willingness to compete, and dictator game giving separately. In a sample of 330 women we find no robust associations between any of these economic preferences and 2D:4D. We find no evidence of a statistically significant relation for 16 of the 18 total regressions we run. The two regression specifications which are statistically significant have not previously been reported and the associations are not in the expected direction, and therefore they are unlikely to represent a real effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Economic Science Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40881-019-00076-y\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Economic Science Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-019-00076-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/10/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-019-00076-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

许多研究报告了2D:4D(产前睾酮暴露的假定标记)与经济偏好之间的关联。然而,这些研究大多样本量有限,并且测试了多个假设(没有预先注册)。在这项研究中,我们主要复制了2D:4D比例与风险承担、竞争意愿和独裁者博弈给予之间关系的常见规范。在330名女性的样本中,我们发现这些经济偏好与2D:4D之间没有明显的联系。在我们运行的18个总回归中,有16个没有发现统计学显著关系的证据。这两个具有统计显著性的回归规范以前没有被报道过,其关联也不在预期的方向上,因此它们不太可能代表真正的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The digit ratio (2D:4D) and economic preferences: no robust associations in a sample of 330 women.

Many studies report on the association between 2D:4D, a putative marker for prenatal testosterone exposure, and economic preferences. However, most of these studies have limited sample sizes and test multiple hypotheses (without preregistration). In this study we mainly replicate the common specifications found in the literature for the association between the 2D:4D ratio and risk taking, the willingness to compete, and dictator game giving separately. In a sample of 330 women we find no robust associations between any of these economic preferences and 2D:4D. We find no evidence of a statistically significant relation for 16 of the 18 total regressions we run. The two regression specifications which are statistically significant have not previously been reported and the associations are not in the expected direction, and therefore they are unlikely to represent a real effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the robustness of social norm elicitation Discounting in finite-time bargaining experiments Stress or failure? An experimental protocol to distinguish the environmental determinants of decision-making Internet “piracy” and book sales: a field experiment Eliciting risk preferences in an artefactual field experiment via replication and an alternative approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1