无菌处理的工作系统分析:灭菌和病例车准备。

Myrtede Alfred, Ken Catchpole, Emily Huffer, Kevin Taafe, Larry Fredendall
{"title":"无菌处理的工作系统分析:灭菌和病例车准备。","authors":"Myrtede Alfred,&nbsp;Ken Catchpole,&nbsp;Emily Huffer,&nbsp;Kevin Taafe,&nbsp;Larry Fredendall","doi":"10.1108/S1474-823120190000018008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Achieving reliable instrument reprocessing requires finding the right balance among cost, productivity, and safety. However, there have been few attempts to comprehensively examine sterile processing department (SPD) work systems. We considered an SPD as an example of a socio-technical system - where people, tools, technologies, the work environment, and the organization mutually interact - and applied work systems analysis (WSA) to provide a framework for future intervention and improvement. The study was conducted at two SPD facilities at a 700-bed academic medical center servicing 56 onsite clinics, 31 operating rooms (ORs), and nine ambulatory centers. Process maps, task analyses, abstraction hierarchies, and variance matrices were developed through direct observations of reprocessing work and staff interviews and iteratively refined based on feedback from an expert group composed of eight staff from SPD, infection control, performance improvement, quality and safety, and perioperative services. Performance sampling conducted focused on specific challenges observed, interruptions during case cart preparation, and analysis of tray defect data from administrative databases. Across five main sterilization tasks (prepare load, perform double-checks, run sterilizers, place trays in cooling, and test the biological indicator), variance analysis identified 16 failures created by 21 performance shaping factors (PSFs), leading to nine different outcome variations. Case cart preparation involved three main tasks: storing trays, picking cases, and prioritizing trays. Variance analysis for case cart preparation identified 11 different failures, 16 different PSFs, and seven different outcomes. Approximately 1% of cases had a tray with a sterilization or case cart preparation defect and 13.5 interruptions per hour were noted during case cart preparation. While highly dependent upon the individual skills of the sterile processing technicians, making the sterilization process less complex and more visible, managing interruptions during case cart preparation, improving communication with the OR, and improving workspace and technology design could enhance performance in instrument reprocessing.</p>","PeriodicalId":35465,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Care Management","volume":"18 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S1474-823120190000018008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Work Systems Analysis of Sterile Processing: Sterilization and Case Cart Preparation.\",\"authors\":\"Myrtede Alfred,&nbsp;Ken Catchpole,&nbsp;Emily Huffer,&nbsp;Kevin Taafe,&nbsp;Larry Fredendall\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S1474-823120190000018008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Achieving reliable instrument reprocessing requires finding the right balance among cost, productivity, and safety. However, there have been few attempts to comprehensively examine sterile processing department (SPD) work systems. We considered an SPD as an example of a socio-technical system - where people, tools, technologies, the work environment, and the organization mutually interact - and applied work systems analysis (WSA) to provide a framework for future intervention and improvement. The study was conducted at two SPD facilities at a 700-bed academic medical center servicing 56 onsite clinics, 31 operating rooms (ORs), and nine ambulatory centers. Process maps, task analyses, abstraction hierarchies, and variance matrices were developed through direct observations of reprocessing work and staff interviews and iteratively refined based on feedback from an expert group composed of eight staff from SPD, infection control, performance improvement, quality and safety, and perioperative services. Performance sampling conducted focused on specific challenges observed, interruptions during case cart preparation, and analysis of tray defect data from administrative databases. Across five main sterilization tasks (prepare load, perform double-checks, run sterilizers, place trays in cooling, and test the biological indicator), variance analysis identified 16 failures created by 21 performance shaping factors (PSFs), leading to nine different outcome variations. Case cart preparation involved three main tasks: storing trays, picking cases, and prioritizing trays. Variance analysis for case cart preparation identified 11 different failures, 16 different PSFs, and seven different outcomes. Approximately 1% of cases had a tray with a sterilization or case cart preparation defect and 13.5 interruptions per hour were noted during case cart preparation. While highly dependent upon the individual skills of the sterile processing technicians, making the sterilization process less complex and more visible, managing interruptions during case cart preparation, improving communication with the OR, and improving workspace and technology design could enhance performance in instrument reprocessing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Care Management\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S1474-823120190000018008\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Care Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-823120190000018008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-823120190000018008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

实现可靠的仪器再处理需要在成本、生产率和安全性之间找到适当的平衡。然而,很少有人尝试全面审查无菌处理部门(SPD)的工作系统。我们将社民党视为社会技术系统的一个例子——人、工具、技术、工作环境和组织相互作用——并应用工作系统分析(WSA)为未来的干预和改进提供框架。该研究在一个拥有700张床位的学术医疗中心的两个SPD设施中进行,该中心为56个现场诊所、31个手术室(ORs)和9个流动中心提供服务。流程图、任务分析、抽象层次和方差矩阵是通过对后处理工作的直接观察和员工访谈而形成的,并根据由SPD、感染控制、绩效改善、质量和安全以及围手术期服务的8名工作人员组成的专家组的反馈进行迭代完善。进行的性能抽样集中于观察到的具体挑战、病例推车准备过程中的中断以及来自管理数据库的托盘缺陷数据分析。在五个主要灭菌任务(准备负载、执行双重检查、运行灭菌器、放置冷却托盘和测试生物指示剂)中,方差分析确定了由21个性能塑造因素(psf)造成的16个失败,导致9个不同的结果变化。案件推车准备涉及三个主要任务:储存托盘,挑选案件,并优先考虑托盘。病例车准备的方差分析确定了11种不同的失败,16种不同的psf和7种不同的结果。大约1%的病例有消毒托盘或病例推车准备缺陷,在病例推车准备期间每小时有13.5次中断。虽然高度依赖于无菌处理技术人员的个人技能,但减少灭菌过程的复杂性和可视性,管理病例车准备期间的中断,改善与手术室的沟通,改善工作空间和技术设计可以提高仪器再处理的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Work Systems Analysis of Sterile Processing: Sterilization and Case Cart Preparation.

Achieving reliable instrument reprocessing requires finding the right balance among cost, productivity, and safety. However, there have been few attempts to comprehensively examine sterile processing department (SPD) work systems. We considered an SPD as an example of a socio-technical system - where people, tools, technologies, the work environment, and the organization mutually interact - and applied work systems analysis (WSA) to provide a framework for future intervention and improvement. The study was conducted at two SPD facilities at a 700-bed academic medical center servicing 56 onsite clinics, 31 operating rooms (ORs), and nine ambulatory centers. Process maps, task analyses, abstraction hierarchies, and variance matrices were developed through direct observations of reprocessing work and staff interviews and iteratively refined based on feedback from an expert group composed of eight staff from SPD, infection control, performance improvement, quality and safety, and perioperative services. Performance sampling conducted focused on specific challenges observed, interruptions during case cart preparation, and analysis of tray defect data from administrative databases. Across five main sterilization tasks (prepare load, perform double-checks, run sterilizers, place trays in cooling, and test the biological indicator), variance analysis identified 16 failures created by 21 performance shaping factors (PSFs), leading to nine different outcome variations. Case cart preparation involved three main tasks: storing trays, picking cases, and prioritizing trays. Variance analysis for case cart preparation identified 11 different failures, 16 different PSFs, and seven different outcomes. Approximately 1% of cases had a tray with a sterilization or case cart preparation defect and 13.5 interruptions per hour were noted during case cart preparation. While highly dependent upon the individual skills of the sterile processing technicians, making the sterilization process less complex and more visible, managing interruptions during case cart preparation, improving communication with the OR, and improving workspace and technology design could enhance performance in instrument reprocessing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Health Care Management
Advances in Health Care Management Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Back to the Future: What Healthcare Organizations Need to Thrive in the Face of Persistent Environmental Uncertainty. Hospital Finances During the First Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From Washington State Hospitals. Examining Knowledge Management and the Culture Change Movement in Long-Term Care: A Study of High-Medicaid-Census Nursing Homes. Innovation Diffusion Across 13 Specialties and Associated Clinician Characteristics. Measure Twice, Change Once: Using Simulation to Support Change Management in Rural Healthcare Delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1