说明癌症风险:关于一种新的BRCA1/2遗传风险修饰因子测试的患者风险沟通偏好和兴趣。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Public Health Genomics Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-03-19 DOI:10.1159/000505854
Jada G Hamilton, Margaux Genoff Garzon, Ibrahim H Shah, Kechna Cadet, Elyse Shuk, Joy S Westerman, Jennifer L Hay, Kenneth Offit, Mark E Robson
{"title":"说明癌症风险:关于一种新的BRCA1/2遗传风险修饰因子测试的患者风险沟通偏好和兴趣。","authors":"Jada G Hamilton,&nbsp;Margaux Genoff Garzon,&nbsp;Ibrahim H Shah,&nbsp;Kechna Cadet,&nbsp;Elyse Shuk,&nbsp;Joy S Westerman,&nbsp;Jennifer L Hay,&nbsp;Kenneth Offit,&nbsp;Mark E Robson","doi":"10.1159/000505854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Genetic risk modifier testing (GRMT), an emerging form of genetic testing based on common single nucleotide polymorphisms and polygenic risk scores, has the potential to refine estimates of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers' breast cancer risks. However, for women to benefit from GRMT, effective approaches for communicating this novel risk information are needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate patient preferences regarding risk communication materials for GRMT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed four separate presentations (panel of genes, icon array, verbal risk estimate, graphical risk estimate) of hypothetical GRMT results, each using varying risk communication strategies to convey different information elements including number of risk modifier variants present, variant prevalence among BRCA1/2 carriers, and implications and uncertainties of test results for cancer risk. Thirty BRCA1/2 carriers evaluated these materials (randomized to low, moderate, or high breast cancer risk versions). Qualitative and quantitative data were obtained through in-person interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across risk versions, participants preferred the presentation of the graphical risk estimate, often in combination with the verbal risk estimate. Interest in GRMT was high; 76.7% of participants wanted their own GRMT. Participants valued the potential for GRMT to clarify their cancer susceptibility and provide actionable information. Many (65.5%) anticipated that GRMT would make risk management decisions easier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with BRCA1/2 mutations could be highly receptive to GRMT, and the minimal amount of necessary information to be included in result risk communication materials includes graphical and verbal estimates of future cancer risk. Findings will inform clinical translation of GRMT in a manner consistent with patients' preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":"23 1-2","pages":"6-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000505854","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illustrating Cancer Risk: Patient Risk Communication Preferences and Interest regarding a Novel BRCA1/2 Genetic Risk Modifier Test.\",\"authors\":\"Jada G Hamilton,&nbsp;Margaux Genoff Garzon,&nbsp;Ibrahim H Shah,&nbsp;Kechna Cadet,&nbsp;Elyse Shuk,&nbsp;Joy S Westerman,&nbsp;Jennifer L Hay,&nbsp;Kenneth Offit,&nbsp;Mark E Robson\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000505854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Genetic risk modifier testing (GRMT), an emerging form of genetic testing based on common single nucleotide polymorphisms and polygenic risk scores, has the potential to refine estimates of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers' breast cancer risks. However, for women to benefit from GRMT, effective approaches for communicating this novel risk information are needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate patient preferences regarding risk communication materials for GRMT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed four separate presentations (panel of genes, icon array, verbal risk estimate, graphical risk estimate) of hypothetical GRMT results, each using varying risk communication strategies to convey different information elements including number of risk modifier variants present, variant prevalence among BRCA1/2 carriers, and implications and uncertainties of test results for cancer risk. Thirty BRCA1/2 carriers evaluated these materials (randomized to low, moderate, or high breast cancer risk versions). Qualitative and quantitative data were obtained through in-person interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across risk versions, participants preferred the presentation of the graphical risk estimate, often in combination with the verbal risk estimate. Interest in GRMT was high; 76.7% of participants wanted their own GRMT. Participants valued the potential for GRMT to clarify their cancer susceptibility and provide actionable information. Many (65.5%) anticipated that GRMT would make risk management decisions easier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with BRCA1/2 mutations could be highly receptive to GRMT, and the minimal amount of necessary information to be included in result risk communication materials includes graphical and verbal estimates of future cancer risk. Findings will inform clinical translation of GRMT in a manner consistent with patients' preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"volume\":\"23 1-2\",\"pages\":\"6-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000505854\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000505854\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000505854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

遗传风险修饰物检测(GRMT)是一种基于常见单核苷酸多态性和多基因风险评分的新兴基因检测形式,具有改进BRCA1/2突变携带者乳腺癌风险评估的潜力。然而,为了使妇女受益于GRMT,需要有效的方法来传达这种新的风险信息。目的:评估患者对GRMT风险沟通材料的偏好。方法:我们对假设的GRMT结果进行了四种单独的演示(基因面板、图标阵列、口头风险估计、图形风险估计),每种演示都使用不同的风险沟通策略来传达不同的信息元素,包括存在的风险修饰因子变异的数量、BRCA1/2携带者的变异流行程度,以及检测结果对癌症风险的影响和不确定性。30名BRCA1/2携带者评估了这些材料(随机分为低、中、高乳腺癌风险版本)。通过面对面访谈获得定性和定量数据。结果:在风险版本中,参与者更喜欢图形风险评估的呈现,通常与口头风险评估相结合。对GRMT的兴趣很高;76.7%的参与者想要自己的GRMT。参与者重视GRMT澄清其癌症易感性和提供可操作信息的潜力。许多人(65.5%)预计GRMT将使风险管理决策更容易。结论:BRCA1/2突变的女性可能高度接受GRMT,结果风险交流材料中包含的最少必要信息包括对未来癌症风险的图形和口头估计。研究结果将以符合患者偏好的方式为GRMT的临床翻译提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Illustrating Cancer Risk: Patient Risk Communication Preferences and Interest regarding a Novel BRCA1/2 Genetic Risk Modifier Test.

Introduction: Genetic risk modifier testing (GRMT), an emerging form of genetic testing based on common single nucleotide polymorphisms and polygenic risk scores, has the potential to refine estimates of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers' breast cancer risks. However, for women to benefit from GRMT, effective approaches for communicating this novel risk information are needed.

Objective: To evaluate patient preferences regarding risk communication materials for GRMT.

Methods: We developed four separate presentations (panel of genes, icon array, verbal risk estimate, graphical risk estimate) of hypothetical GRMT results, each using varying risk communication strategies to convey different information elements including number of risk modifier variants present, variant prevalence among BRCA1/2 carriers, and implications and uncertainties of test results for cancer risk. Thirty BRCA1/2 carriers evaluated these materials (randomized to low, moderate, or high breast cancer risk versions). Qualitative and quantitative data were obtained through in-person interviews.

Results: Across risk versions, participants preferred the presentation of the graphical risk estimate, often in combination with the verbal risk estimate. Interest in GRMT was high; 76.7% of participants wanted their own GRMT. Participants valued the potential for GRMT to clarify their cancer susceptibility and provide actionable information. Many (65.5%) anticipated that GRMT would make risk management decisions easier.

Conclusions: Women with BRCA1/2 mutations could be highly receptive to GRMT, and the minimal amount of necessary information to be included in result risk communication materials includes graphical and verbal estimates of future cancer risk. Findings will inform clinical translation of GRMT in a manner consistent with patients' preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the impact of screen-sharing visual aids during genomic results disclosure via telehealth in diverse families in the TeleKidSeq pilot study. Adopting public health genomics when the house is on fire: How will we navigate to 2030? Modern Family: An Ethical Justification for System-Led Contact of Relatives Eligible for Cascade Screening in the United States. Variation Exists in Service Delivery: Similarities and Differences in the Provision of a Whole Genome Sequencing Service for Paediatric Rare Disease Patients in the National Health Service in England. Evaluating the Implementation of the Rapid Prenatal Exome Sequencing Service in England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1