在加拿大萨斯喀彻温省,对2型糖尿病患者进行团体医疗和个人教育预约的定性评价。

IF 3.9 Q1 Health Professions Diabetes Educator Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-03-31 DOI:10.1177/0145721720913278
Anna Tataryn, Hannah Derbowka, Xinyu Shen, Emily Gage, Ester Kang, Jillian Wlock, Jessica Lieffers
{"title":"在加拿大萨斯喀彻温省,对2型糖尿病患者进行团体医疗和个人教育预约的定性评价。","authors":"Anna Tataryn,&nbsp;Hannah Derbowka,&nbsp;Xinyu Shen,&nbsp;Emily Gage,&nbsp;Ester Kang,&nbsp;Jillian Wlock,&nbsp;Jessica Lieffers","doi":"10.1177/0145721720913278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to capture information on patient experiences and perspectives of group medical appointments (GMAs) and compare them to those attending individual appointments (IAs) with the diabetes education team (usual care) for managing type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults (N = 18; 61% male; 83% 50-70 years old ) with type 2 diabetes (or prediabetes) living in rural Saskatchewan were recruited to complete a semistructured interview on their experiences with GMAs or IAs. To be eligible to participate, individuals must have attended at least 2 GMAs or 2 IAs. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, participants spoke highly of their respective appointment type. Results indicated that both appointment types positively influenced understanding of diabetes management, with the most notable difference being greater understanding of stress management in the GMAs. Participants identified several positive aspects of each appointment type, which included convenience, supportive and enjoyable, and informative for GMAs and time and tailored information for IAs. Participants provided some suggestions to improve diabetes related-care for their respective appointment type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants of GMAs and IAs for type 2 diabetes each reported unique strengths to their respective care plan and reported benefiting from their care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50584,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Educator","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0145721720913278","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Evaluation of Patient Experiences With Group Medical and Individual Education Appointments for Type 2 Diabetes Management in Saskatchewan, Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Tataryn,&nbsp;Hannah Derbowka,&nbsp;Xinyu Shen,&nbsp;Emily Gage,&nbsp;Ester Kang,&nbsp;Jillian Wlock,&nbsp;Jessica Lieffers\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0145721720913278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to capture information on patient experiences and perspectives of group medical appointments (GMAs) and compare them to those attending individual appointments (IAs) with the diabetes education team (usual care) for managing type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults (N = 18; 61% male; 83% 50-70 years old ) with type 2 diabetes (or prediabetes) living in rural Saskatchewan were recruited to complete a semistructured interview on their experiences with GMAs or IAs. To be eligible to participate, individuals must have attended at least 2 GMAs or 2 IAs. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, participants spoke highly of their respective appointment type. Results indicated that both appointment types positively influenced understanding of diabetes management, with the most notable difference being greater understanding of stress management in the GMAs. Participants identified several positive aspects of each appointment type, which included convenience, supportive and enjoyable, and informative for GMAs and time and tailored information for IAs. Participants provided some suggestions to improve diabetes related-care for their respective appointment type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants of GMAs and IAs for type 2 diabetes each reported unique strengths to their respective care plan and reported benefiting from their care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Educator\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0145721720913278\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721720913278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/3/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721720913278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是获取关于患者经历和群体医疗预约(GMAs)的观点的信息,并将其与糖尿病教育团队(常规护理)的个人预约(IAs)进行比较,以管理2型糖尿病。方法:成人(N = 18;男性61%;研究招募了居住在萨斯喀彻温省农村地区的83%(50-70岁)2型糖尿病(或糖尿病前期)患者,对他们的gma或IAs经历进行了半结构化访谈。为了有资格参加,个人必须参加至少2个gma或2个IAs。使用内容分析对转录本进行编码和分析。结果:总体而言,参与者对各自的预约方式评价很高。结果表明,两种预约方式对糖尿病管理的理解都有积极的影响,其中最显著的差异是对压力管理的理解。与会者确定了每种预约类型的几个积极方面,其中包括便利、支持和愉快,为全球管理人员提供信息,为国际评估人员提供时间和量身定制的信息。与会者提出了一些建议,以改善各自预约类型的糖尿病相关护理。结论:2型糖尿病gma和IAs的参与者都报告了各自护理计划的独特优势,并报告了从他们的护理中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Qualitative Evaluation of Patient Experiences With Group Medical and Individual Education Appointments for Type 2 Diabetes Management in Saskatchewan, Canada.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to capture information on patient experiences and perspectives of group medical appointments (GMAs) and compare them to those attending individual appointments (IAs) with the diabetes education team (usual care) for managing type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Adults (N = 18; 61% male; 83% 50-70 years old ) with type 2 diabetes (or prediabetes) living in rural Saskatchewan were recruited to complete a semistructured interview on their experiences with GMAs or IAs. To be eligible to participate, individuals must have attended at least 2 GMAs or 2 IAs. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using content analysis.

Results: Overall, participants spoke highly of their respective appointment type. Results indicated that both appointment types positively influenced understanding of diabetes management, with the most notable difference being greater understanding of stress management in the GMAs. Participants identified several positive aspects of each appointment type, which included convenience, supportive and enjoyable, and informative for GMAs and time and tailored information for IAs. Participants provided some suggestions to improve diabetes related-care for their respective appointment type.

Conclusions: Participants of GMAs and IAs for type 2 diabetes each reported unique strengths to their respective care plan and reported benefiting from their care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Educator
Diabetes Educator 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Diabetes Educator (TDE) is the official journal of the American Association of Di­abetes Educators (AADE). It is a peer-reviewed journal intended to serve as a reference source for the science and art of diabetes management. TDE publishes original articles that relate to aspects of patient care and education, clinical practice and/or research, and the multidisciplinary pro­fession of diabetes education as represented by nurses, dietitians, physicians, pharmacists, mental health professionals, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists.
期刊最新文献
Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Tokoh dan Ajaran Tasawuf Sufi Besar Mata Pelajaran Akidah Akhlak Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Pada Materi Kalimat Thayyibah di Kelas III MI Salafiyah Syafi’iyah Proto 01 Kabupaten Pekalongan Menanamkan Sikap Sopan Santun Melalui Pendidikan Karakter Pada Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Mengenai Materi Adab Santun dan Menghargai Teman di Kelas 2 MISJanggala 2 Kecamatan Cidolog Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fikih Materi Shalat Jamak dan Qashar Melalui Metode Modeling The Way Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Materi Pendistribusian Zakat Secara Produktif Dalam Islam Pada Fase E Kelas X SMKS Garudaya Bontonmpo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1