西班牙中重度特应性皮炎临床治疗方法共识:德尔菲调查。

IF 1.5 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Dermatology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-04-07 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/1524293
Joaquín Sastre, Esther Serra Baldrich, José Carlos Armario Hita, L Herráez, Ignacio Jáuregui, Ana Martín-Santiago, Javier Ortiz de Frutos, Juan Francisco Silvestre, Antonio Valero
{"title":"西班牙中重度特应性皮炎临床治疗方法共识:德尔菲调查。","authors":"Joaquín Sastre, Esther Serra Baldrich, José Carlos Armario Hita, L Herráez, Ignacio Jáuregui, Ana Martín-Santiago, Javier Ortiz de Frutos, Juan Francisco Silvestre, Antonio Valero","doi":"10.1155/2020/1524293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to gather information on the current assessment and management of patients with moderate-to-severe AD in routine daily practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional two-round Delphi survey with the participation of dermatologists and allergologists throughout Spain was conducted. They completed a 46-item questionnaire, and consensus was defined when responses of ≥80% of participants coincided in the categories of a 5-point Likert scale for that item.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 specialists (aged 40-59 years) completed the two rounds. Participants agreed regarding the consideration of AD as a multifaceted disease and the differences in clinical presentation of AD according to the patient's age. It is recommendable to perform a skin biopsy to exclude early stage T-cell cutaneous lymphoma, psoriasis, or dermatitis herpetiformis, among others (99.1%). Also, consensus was reached regarding the use of the SCORAD index to quantify the severity of the disease (86.7%), the use of wet wraps to increase the effect of topical corticosteroids (90.4%), the usefulness of proactive treatment during follow-up (85.6%) and tacrolimus ointment (91.2%) to reduce new flares, and the fact that crisaborole is not the treatment of choice for severe AD (92.4%). AD was not considered a contraindication for immunotherapy in patients with allergic respiratory diseases (92.4%). In patients with severe AD, the use of immune response modifier drugs (97.6%) or phototherapy (92.8%) does not sufficiently cover their treatment needs. Consensus was also obtained regarding the role of the new biologic drugs (93.6%) targeting cytokines involved in the Th2 inflammatory pathway (92.0%) and the potential role of dupilumab as first-line treatment (90.4%) in moderate-to-severe AD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes a reference framework to the care of AD patients. There is no diagnostic test or biomarkers to direct treatment or to assess the severity of the disease, and many therapeutic challenges remain.</p>","PeriodicalId":11338,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7166259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus on the Clinical Approach to Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Spain: A Delphi Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Joaquín Sastre, Esther Serra Baldrich, José Carlos Armario Hita, L Herráez, Ignacio Jáuregui, Ana Martín-Santiago, Javier Ortiz de Frutos, Juan Francisco Silvestre, Antonio Valero\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/1524293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to gather information on the current assessment and management of patients with moderate-to-severe AD in routine daily practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional two-round Delphi survey with the participation of dermatologists and allergologists throughout Spain was conducted. They completed a 46-item questionnaire, and consensus was defined when responses of ≥80% of participants coincided in the categories of a 5-point Likert scale for that item.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 specialists (aged 40-59 years) completed the two rounds. Participants agreed regarding the consideration of AD as a multifaceted disease and the differences in clinical presentation of AD according to the patient's age. It is recommendable to perform a skin biopsy to exclude early stage T-cell cutaneous lymphoma, psoriasis, or dermatitis herpetiformis, among others (99.1%). Also, consensus was reached regarding the use of the SCORAD index to quantify the severity of the disease (86.7%), the use of wet wraps to increase the effect of topical corticosteroids (90.4%), the usefulness of proactive treatment during follow-up (85.6%) and tacrolimus ointment (91.2%) to reduce new flares, and the fact that crisaborole is not the treatment of choice for severe AD (92.4%). AD was not considered a contraindication for immunotherapy in patients with allergic respiratory diseases (92.4%). In patients with severe AD, the use of immune response modifier drugs (97.6%) or phototherapy (92.8%) does not sufficiently cover their treatment needs. Consensus was also obtained regarding the role of the new biologic drugs (93.6%) targeting cytokines involved in the Th2 inflammatory pathway (92.0%) and the potential role of dupilumab as first-line treatment (90.4%) in moderate-to-severe AD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study contributes a reference framework to the care of AD patients. There is no diagnostic test or biomarkers to direct treatment or to assess the severity of the disease, and many therapeutic challenges remain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7166259/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1524293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1524293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究的目的是收集目前在日常工作中对中重度 AD 患者进行评估和管理的信息:方法:在西班牙各地的皮肤科医生和过敏科医生的参与下,进行了两轮德尔菲横向调查。他们填写了一份包含 46 个项目的调查问卷,当≥80% 的参与者在该项目 5 点李克特量表的类别中回答一致时,即达成共识:共有 105 名专家(40-59 岁)完成了两轮问卷调查。结果:共有 105 名专家(年龄在 40-59 岁之间)完成了两轮问卷调查,他们一致认为注意力缺失症是一种多发性疾病,不同年龄段的患者在注意力缺失症的临床表现上存在差异。建议进行皮肤活检,以排除早期T细胞皮肤淋巴瘤、银屑病或疱疹性皮炎等疾病(99.1%)。此外,在以下方面也达成了共识:使用 SCORAD 指数来量化疾病的严重程度(86.7%);使用湿包裹来提高局部皮质类固醇激素的效果(90.4%);在随访期间积极治疗(85.6%)和他克莫司软膏(91.2%)对减少新发疾病的作用;以及脆柏醇不是治疗严重 AD 的首选(92.4%)。过敏性呼吸道疾病患者不认为 AD 是免疫疗法的禁忌症(92.4%)。对于重症 AD 患者,使用免疫反应调节剂药物(97.6%)或光疗(92.8%)不足以满足其治疗需求。针对Th2炎症通路细胞因子的新型生物药物(93.6%)(92.0%)的作用,以及dupilumab作为一线治疗药物(90.4%)在中度至重度AD患者中的潜在作用也达成了共识:这项研究为AD患者的治疗提供了一个参考框架。目前还没有诊断测试或生物标志物来指导治疗或评估疾病的严重程度,许多治疗难题依然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consensus on the Clinical Approach to Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Spain: A Delphi Survey.

Background: The purpose of this study was to gather information on the current assessment and management of patients with moderate-to-severe AD in routine daily practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional two-round Delphi survey with the participation of dermatologists and allergologists throughout Spain was conducted. They completed a 46-item questionnaire, and consensus was defined when responses of ≥80% of participants coincided in the categories of a 5-point Likert scale for that item.

Results: A total of 105 specialists (aged 40-59 years) completed the two rounds. Participants agreed regarding the consideration of AD as a multifaceted disease and the differences in clinical presentation of AD according to the patient's age. It is recommendable to perform a skin biopsy to exclude early stage T-cell cutaneous lymphoma, psoriasis, or dermatitis herpetiformis, among others (99.1%). Also, consensus was reached regarding the use of the SCORAD index to quantify the severity of the disease (86.7%), the use of wet wraps to increase the effect of topical corticosteroids (90.4%), the usefulness of proactive treatment during follow-up (85.6%) and tacrolimus ointment (91.2%) to reduce new flares, and the fact that crisaborole is not the treatment of choice for severe AD (92.4%). AD was not considered a contraindication for immunotherapy in patients with allergic respiratory diseases (92.4%). In patients with severe AD, the use of immune response modifier drugs (97.6%) or phototherapy (92.8%) does not sufficiently cover their treatment needs. Consensus was also obtained regarding the role of the new biologic drugs (93.6%) targeting cytokines involved in the Th2 inflammatory pathway (92.0%) and the potential role of dupilumab as first-line treatment (90.4%) in moderate-to-severe AD patients.

Conclusion: This study contributes a reference framework to the care of AD patients. There is no diagnostic test or biomarkers to direct treatment or to assess the severity of the disease, and many therapeutic challenges remain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study of Demographic and Clinical Criteria Between Male and Female Patients With Pemphigus Referred to a Referral Hospital in Iran. Morphological and Prognostic Values of Skin Lesions in Patients with COVID-19. Epidemiologic, Clinical and Mycological Profile of Onychomycosis in the Hospital Setting in Benin. Magnitude of Psoriasis and Its Associated Factors, and Quality of Life of Psoriasis Patients among Patients Who Attend Dermatology Clinic at Tibebe Ghion Comprehensive Specialized and Addis Alem Primary Hospitals, North West Ethiopia, 2022: Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Molecular Biological Verification of the Healing Effect of Biphasic Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation in Model Rats of Skin Abrasion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1