生态对比的三位一体:以物种、功能和系统发育多样性测度的丰富昆虫群落为例。

IF 2.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences BMC Ecology Pub Date : 2020-05-10 DOI:10.1186/s12898-020-00298-3
Elia Guariento, Patrick Strutzenberger, Christine Truxa, Konrad Fiedler
{"title":"生态对比的三位一体:以物种、功能和系统发育多样性测度的丰富昆虫群落为例。","authors":"Elia Guariento,&nbsp;Patrick Strutzenberger,&nbsp;Christine Truxa,&nbsp;Konrad Fiedler","doi":"10.1186/s12898-020-00298-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 'classical' concept of species diversity was extended in the last decades into other dimensions focusing on the functional and phylogenetic diversity of communities. These measures are often argued to allow a deeper understanding of the mechanisms shaping community assembly along environmental gradients. Because of practical impediments, thus far only very few studies evaluated the performance of these diversity measures on large empirical data sets. Here, data on species-rich riparian moth communities under different flood regimes and from three different rivers has been used to compare the power of various diversity measures to uncover ecological contrasts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrary to the expectation, classical metrics of species diversity (Hill numbers N1, N2 and N<sub>inf</sub>) and evenness (Buzas-Gibson's E and Pielous's J) turned out to be the most powerful measures in unravelling the two gradients investigated in this study (e.g. flood regime and region). Several measures of functional and phylogenetic diversity tended to depict either only one or none of these contrasts. Rao's Q behaved similarly as species diversity and evenness. NTI and NRI showed a similar pattern among each other but, were different to all the other measures. Functional Divergence also behaved idiosyncratically across the 28 moth communities. The community weighted means of nearly all individual functional traits showed significant ecological patterns, supporting the relevance of the selected traits in shaping assemblage compositions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Species diversity and evenness measures turned out to be the most powerful metrics and clearly reflected both investigated environmental contrasts. This poses the question when it is useful to compile the additional data necessary for the calculation of additional diversity measures, since assembling trait bases and community phylogenies often requires a high work load. Apart from these methodological issues, most of the diversity measures related to communities of terrestrial insects like moths increased in forests that still are subject to flooding dynamics. This emphasizes the high conservation value of riparian forests and the importance of keeping and restoring river dynamics as a means of fostering also terrestrial biodiversity in floodplain areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":9232,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12898-020-00298-3","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures.\",\"authors\":\"Elia Guariento,&nbsp;Patrick Strutzenberger,&nbsp;Christine Truxa,&nbsp;Konrad Fiedler\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12898-020-00298-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 'classical' concept of species diversity was extended in the last decades into other dimensions focusing on the functional and phylogenetic diversity of communities. These measures are often argued to allow a deeper understanding of the mechanisms shaping community assembly along environmental gradients. Because of practical impediments, thus far only very few studies evaluated the performance of these diversity measures on large empirical data sets. Here, data on species-rich riparian moth communities under different flood regimes and from three different rivers has been used to compare the power of various diversity measures to uncover ecological contrasts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrary to the expectation, classical metrics of species diversity (Hill numbers N1, N2 and N<sub>inf</sub>) and evenness (Buzas-Gibson's E and Pielous's J) turned out to be the most powerful measures in unravelling the two gradients investigated in this study (e.g. flood regime and region). Several measures of functional and phylogenetic diversity tended to depict either only one or none of these contrasts. Rao's Q behaved similarly as species diversity and evenness. NTI and NRI showed a similar pattern among each other but, were different to all the other measures. Functional Divergence also behaved idiosyncratically across the 28 moth communities. The community weighted means of nearly all individual functional traits showed significant ecological patterns, supporting the relevance of the selected traits in shaping assemblage compositions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Species diversity and evenness measures turned out to be the most powerful metrics and clearly reflected both investigated environmental contrasts. This poses the question when it is useful to compile the additional data necessary for the calculation of additional diversity measures, since assembling trait bases and community phylogenies often requires a high work load. Apart from these methodological issues, most of the diversity measures related to communities of terrestrial insects like moths increased in forests that still are subject to flooding dynamics. This emphasizes the high conservation value of riparian forests and the importance of keeping and restoring river dynamics as a means of fostering also terrestrial biodiversity in floodplain areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12898-020-00298-3\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00298-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-020-00298-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:近几十年来,物种多样性的“经典”概念被扩展到其他维度,重点关注群落的功能和系统发育多样性。这些措施通常被认为是为了更深入地了解沿着环境梯度形成社区聚集的机制。由于实际的障碍,迄今为止只有很少的研究评估了这些多样性措施在大型经验数据集上的表现。在这里,在不同的洪水制度和三条不同的河流中,物种丰富的河岸飞蛾群落的数据被用来比较各种多样性措施的力量,以揭示生态差异。结果:与预期相反,物种多样性(Hill数N1、N2和Ninf)和均匀度(Buzas-Gibson’s E和Pielous’s J)的经典指标是揭示本研究中研究的两个梯度(如洪水状态和区域)的最有力指标。几种功能和系统发育多样性的测量方法倾向于只描述一种或不描述这些对比。Rao的Q值与物种多样性和均匀度的表现相似。NTI和NRI之间表现出相似的模式,但与所有其他措施不同。功能分化在28个蛾类群落中也表现出特殊的特征。几乎所有个体功能性状的群落加权平均值都显示出显著的生态格局,支持了所选性状在形成群落组成方面的相关性。结论:物种多样性和均匀度测量是最有效的指标,能够清晰地反映两种环境差异。这就提出了一个问题,即什么时候汇编计算额外多样性措施所需的额外数据是有用的,因为收集特征基础和群落系统发育往往需要大量的工作。除了这些方法上的问题外,与飞蛾等陆生昆虫群落有关的大多数多样性措施在仍然受洪水动态影响的森林中有所增加。这强调了河岸森林的高度保护价值,以及保持和恢复河流动态作为促进洪泛区陆地生物多样性的一种手段的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The trinity of ecological contrasts: a case study on rich insect assemblages by means of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity measures.

Background: The 'classical' concept of species diversity was extended in the last decades into other dimensions focusing on the functional and phylogenetic diversity of communities. These measures are often argued to allow a deeper understanding of the mechanisms shaping community assembly along environmental gradients. Because of practical impediments, thus far only very few studies evaluated the performance of these diversity measures on large empirical data sets. Here, data on species-rich riparian moth communities under different flood regimes and from three different rivers has been used to compare the power of various diversity measures to uncover ecological contrasts.

Results: Contrary to the expectation, classical metrics of species diversity (Hill numbers N1, N2 and Ninf) and evenness (Buzas-Gibson's E and Pielous's J) turned out to be the most powerful measures in unravelling the two gradients investigated in this study (e.g. flood regime and region). Several measures of functional and phylogenetic diversity tended to depict either only one or none of these contrasts. Rao's Q behaved similarly as species diversity and evenness. NTI and NRI showed a similar pattern among each other but, were different to all the other measures. Functional Divergence also behaved idiosyncratically across the 28 moth communities. The community weighted means of nearly all individual functional traits showed significant ecological patterns, supporting the relevance of the selected traits in shaping assemblage compositions.

Conclusions: Species diversity and evenness measures turned out to be the most powerful metrics and clearly reflected both investigated environmental contrasts. This poses the question when it is useful to compile the additional data necessary for the calculation of additional diversity measures, since assembling trait bases and community phylogenies often requires a high work load. Apart from these methodological issues, most of the diversity measures related to communities of terrestrial insects like moths increased in forests that still are subject to flooding dynamics. This emphasizes the high conservation value of riparian forests and the importance of keeping and restoring river dynamics as a means of fostering also terrestrial biodiversity in floodplain areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ecology
BMC Ecology ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ecology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on environmental, behavioral and population ecology as well as biodiversity of plants, animals and microbes.
期刊最新文献
Hydrology influences breeding time in the white-throated dipper. Effects of habitat edges on vegetation structure and the vulnerable golden-brown mouse lemur (Microcebus ravelobensis) in northwestern Madagascar. Invasive raccoon management systems and challenges in regions with active control. Effects of tree species and topography on soil and microbial biomass stoichiometry in Funiu Mountain, China. Bioclimatic zonation and potential distribution of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in South Kivu Province, DR Congo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1