评估儿科患者使用非接触式红外测温仪测量体温的首选部位。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Minerva pediatrica Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-15 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5276.20.05755-2
Saiprasad O Kavthekar, Ashok A Chougule, Swati S Kavthekar, Anil B Kurane, Sachin Verma
{"title":"评估儿科患者使用非接触式红外测温仪测量体温的首选部位。","authors":"Saiprasad O Kavthekar, Ashok A Chougule, Swati S Kavthekar, Anil B Kurane, Sachin Verma","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.20.05755-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate temperature measurement with little or no discomfort that is safe, without risk of hospital-acquired infections or perforations, is the preferred choice of medical professionals in pediatric settings. The objective was to discover the preferable site for body temperature measurement using non-contact infra-red thermometer (NCIT) among pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NCIT measurement at mid forehead (F), right temporal region (T), right side of neck-over-carotid artery area (N), jugular notch (J), sternum (S), umbilical region and sublingual region (U) were compared with digital axillary temperature (DAT) in a single attempt in 500 patients, aged between 2 to 5 years with fever. Data was analyzed using Pearson's correlation, paired t-test and Bland-Altman plot to assess the correlation and agreement between the DAT and NCIT sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean temperature of NCIT-T (38.42±0.64 °C) was more agreeable with DAT (38.42±0.63 °C) compared to other body sites. The minimum mean bias of -0.00480 °C was noted for NCIT-F with 95% CI of -0.164-0.15; however, NCIT-F revealed many outliers as compared to NCIT-J. A strong positive correlation existed between DAT and NCIT sites (r value: 0.99-0.98). However, significant difference was found between DAT and NCIT-N, NCIT-F and NCIT-U (P<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NCIT-J is the most preferable choice for measuring body temperature and can be interchanged with DAT. It will help to deliver fast results with enhanced patient comfort due to its non-invasive nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":18533,"journal":{"name":"Minerva pediatrica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of preferable site for temperature measurement using non-contact infra-red temperature among pediatric patients.\",\"authors\":\"Saiprasad O Kavthekar, Ashok A Chougule, Swati S Kavthekar, Anil B Kurane, Sachin Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5276.20.05755-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate temperature measurement with little or no discomfort that is safe, without risk of hospital-acquired infections or perforations, is the preferred choice of medical professionals in pediatric settings. The objective was to discover the preferable site for body temperature measurement using non-contact infra-red thermometer (NCIT) among pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NCIT measurement at mid forehead (F), right temporal region (T), right side of neck-over-carotid artery area (N), jugular notch (J), sternum (S), umbilical region and sublingual region (U) were compared with digital axillary temperature (DAT) in a single attempt in 500 patients, aged between 2 to 5 years with fever. Data was analyzed using Pearson's correlation, paired t-test and Bland-Altman plot to assess the correlation and agreement between the DAT and NCIT sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean temperature of NCIT-T (38.42±0.64 °C) was more agreeable with DAT (38.42±0.63 °C) compared to other body sites. The minimum mean bias of -0.00480 °C was noted for NCIT-F with 95% CI of -0.164-0.15; however, NCIT-F revealed many outliers as compared to NCIT-J. A strong positive correlation existed between DAT and NCIT sites (r value: 0.99-0.98). However, significant difference was found between DAT and NCIT-N, NCIT-F and NCIT-U (P<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NCIT-J is the most preferable choice for measuring body temperature and can be interchanged with DAT. It will help to deliver fast results with enhanced patient comfort due to its non-invasive nature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva pediatrica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva pediatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.20.05755-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.20.05755-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在儿科环境中,准确测量体温、安全且几乎无不适感、无医院感染或穿孔风险是医务人员的首选。本研究旨在发现儿科患者使用非接触式红外线体温计(NCIT)测量体温的首选部位:方法:在 500 名 2 至 5 岁的发烧患者中,将前额中部 (F)、右颞部 (T)、颈部右侧-颈动脉上方区域 (N)、颈静脉切迹 (J)、胸骨 (S)、脐部和舌下区域 (U) 的非接触式红外体温计测量值与数字腋温 (DAT) 进行一次性比较。采用皮尔逊相关性、配对 t 检验和布兰德-阿尔特曼图对数据进行分析,以评估 DAT 和 NCIT 位置之间的相关性和一致性:结果:与其他身体部位相比,NCIT-T 的平均温度(38.42±0.64 ℃)与 DAT 的平均温度(38.42±0.63 ℃)更为一致。NCIT-F的平均偏差最小,为-0.00480 ℃,95% CI为-0.164-0.15;但与NCIT-J相比,NCIT-F显示出许多异常值。DAT 和 NCIT 点之间存在很强的正相关性(r 值:0.99-0.98)。然而,DAT 与 NCIT-N、NCIT-F 和 NCIT-U 之间存在明显差异(PConclusions:NCIT-J 是测量体温的最佳选择,可与 DAT 互换使用。由于其非侵入性,它将有助于快速得出结果,并提高病人的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of preferable site for temperature measurement using non-contact infra-red temperature among pediatric patients.

Background: Accurate temperature measurement with little or no discomfort that is safe, without risk of hospital-acquired infections or perforations, is the preferred choice of medical professionals in pediatric settings. The objective was to discover the preferable site for body temperature measurement using non-contact infra-red thermometer (NCIT) among pediatric patients.

Methods: NCIT measurement at mid forehead (F), right temporal region (T), right side of neck-over-carotid artery area (N), jugular notch (J), sternum (S), umbilical region and sublingual region (U) were compared with digital axillary temperature (DAT) in a single attempt in 500 patients, aged between 2 to 5 years with fever. Data was analyzed using Pearson's correlation, paired t-test and Bland-Altman plot to assess the correlation and agreement between the DAT and NCIT sites.

Results: The mean temperature of NCIT-T (38.42±0.64 °C) was more agreeable with DAT (38.42±0.63 °C) compared to other body sites. The minimum mean bias of -0.00480 °C was noted for NCIT-F with 95% CI of -0.164-0.15; however, NCIT-F revealed many outliers as compared to NCIT-J. A strong positive correlation existed between DAT and NCIT sites (r value: 0.99-0.98). However, significant difference was found between DAT and NCIT-N, NCIT-F and NCIT-U (P<0.0001).

Conclusions: NCIT-J is the most preferable choice for measuring body temperature and can be interchanged with DAT. It will help to deliver fast results with enhanced patient comfort due to its non-invasive nature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva pediatrica
Minerva pediatrica PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Pediatrica publishes scientific papers on pediatrics, neonatology, adolescent medicine, child and adolescent psychiatry and pediatric surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of pediatric nurses' perception of factors affecting negotiation of care in a Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Unit. The use of analgesics in pediatric patients with body injuries in pre-hospital conditions. Respiratory polygraphy in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective study. Evaluation of factors affecting total nucleated cells in umbilical cord blood collected for the Calabria Cord Blood Bank. Risk factors associated with wheezing in severe pediatric community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1