可乐定和右美托咪定在危重患者心脏手术后心血管的安全性。

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-05-07 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/4750615
Angelina Grest, Judith Kurmann, Markus Müller, Victor Jeger, Bernard Krüger, Donat R Spahn, Dominique Bettex, Alain Rudiger
{"title":"可乐定和右美托咪定在危重患者心脏手术后心血管的安全性。","authors":"Angelina Grest,&nbsp;Judith Kurmann,&nbsp;Markus Müller,&nbsp;Victor Jeger,&nbsp;Bernard Krüger,&nbsp;Donat R Spahn,&nbsp;Dominique Bettex,&nbsp;Alain Rudiger","doi":"10.1155/2020/4750615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the haemodynamic adverse effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients after cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2769 patients were screened during the 30-month study period. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and norepinephrine requirements were assessed 3-hourly during the first 12 hours of the continuous drug infusion. Results are given as median (interquartile range) or numbers (percentages).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving clonidine (<i>n</i> = 193) were younger (66 (57-73) vs 70 (63-77) years, <i>p</i>=0.003) and had a lower SAPS II (35 (27-48) vs 41 (31-54), <i>p</i>=0.008) compared with patients receiving dexmedetomidine (<i>n</i> = 141). At the start of the drug infusion, HR (90 (75-100) vs 90 (80-105) bpm, <i>p</i>=0.028), MAP (70 (65-80) vs 70 (65-75) mmHg, <i>p</i>=0.093), and norepinephrine (0.05 (0.00-0.11) vs 0.12 (0.03-0.19) mcg/kg/min, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were recorded in patients with clonidine and dexmedetomidine. Bradycardia (HR < 60 bpm) developed in 7.8% with clonidine and 5.7% with dexmedetomidine (<i>p</i>=0.51). Between baseline and 12 hours, norepinephrine remained stable in the clonidine group (0.00 (-0.04-0.02) mcg/kg/min) and decreased in the dexmedetomidine group (-0.03 (-0.10-0.02) mcg/kg/min, <i>p</i>=0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dexmedetomidine and the low-cost drug clonidine can both be used safely in selected patients after cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2020 ","pages":"4750615"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/4750615","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular Safety of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Patients after Cardiac Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Angelina Grest,&nbsp;Judith Kurmann,&nbsp;Markus Müller,&nbsp;Victor Jeger,&nbsp;Bernard Krüger,&nbsp;Donat R Spahn,&nbsp;Dominique Bettex,&nbsp;Alain Rudiger\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/4750615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the haemodynamic adverse effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients after cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2769 patients were screened during the 30-month study period. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and norepinephrine requirements were assessed 3-hourly during the first 12 hours of the continuous drug infusion. Results are given as median (interquartile range) or numbers (percentages).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving clonidine (<i>n</i> = 193) were younger (66 (57-73) vs 70 (63-77) years, <i>p</i>=0.003) and had a lower SAPS II (35 (27-48) vs 41 (31-54), <i>p</i>=0.008) compared with patients receiving dexmedetomidine (<i>n</i> = 141). At the start of the drug infusion, HR (90 (75-100) vs 90 (80-105) bpm, <i>p</i>=0.028), MAP (70 (65-80) vs 70 (65-75) mmHg, <i>p</i>=0.093), and norepinephrine (0.05 (0.00-0.11) vs 0.12 (0.03-0.19) mcg/kg/min, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were recorded in patients with clonidine and dexmedetomidine. Bradycardia (HR < 60 bpm) developed in 7.8% with clonidine and 5.7% with dexmedetomidine (<i>p</i>=0.51). Between baseline and 12 hours, norepinephrine remained stable in the clonidine group (0.00 (-0.04-0.02) mcg/kg/min) and decreased in the dexmedetomidine group (-0.03 (-0.10-0.02) mcg/kg/min, <i>p</i>=0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dexmedetomidine and the low-cost drug clonidine can both be used safely in selected patients after cardiac surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"4750615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/4750615\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4750615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4750615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:本回顾性研究的目的是评估可乐定和右美托咪定对心脏手术后危重患者血流动力学的不良影响。方法:在30个月的研究期间筛选2769例患者。心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)和去甲肾上腺素需要量在连续输注药物的前12小时内每3小时进行评估。结果以中位数(四分位数范围)或数字(百分比)给出。结果:接受可乐定治疗的患者(n = 193)比接受右美托咪定治疗的患者(n = 141)更年轻(66 (57-73)vs 70 (63-77), p=0.003), SAPS II (35 (27-48) vs 41 (31-54), p=0.008)。在药物输注开始时,记录下可乐定和右美托咪定患者的HR (90 (75-100) vs 90 (80-105) bpm, p=0.028)、MAP (70 (65-80) vs 70 (65-75) mmHg, p=0.093)和去甲肾上腺素(0.05 (0.00-0.11)vs 0.12 (0.03-0.19) mcg/kg/min, p < 0.001)。心动过缓(HR p=0.51)。从基线到12小时,可乐定组的去甲肾上腺素保持稳定(0.00 (-0.04-0.02)mcg/kg/min),右美托咪定组的去甲肾上腺素下降(-0.03 (-0.10-0.02)mcg/kg/min, p=0.007)。结论:右美托咪定与低成本药物可乐定均可安全用于选定的心脏术后患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiovascular Safety of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Patients after Cardiac Surgery.

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the haemodynamic adverse effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients after cardiac surgery.

Methods: 2769 patients were screened during the 30-month study period. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and norepinephrine requirements were assessed 3-hourly during the first 12 hours of the continuous drug infusion. Results are given as median (interquartile range) or numbers (percentages).

Results: Patients receiving clonidine (n = 193) were younger (66 (57-73) vs 70 (63-77) years, p=0.003) and had a lower SAPS II (35 (27-48) vs 41 (31-54), p=0.008) compared with patients receiving dexmedetomidine (n = 141). At the start of the drug infusion, HR (90 (75-100) vs 90 (80-105) bpm, p=0.028), MAP (70 (65-80) vs 70 (65-75) mmHg, p=0.093), and norepinephrine (0.05 (0.00-0.11) vs 0.12 (0.03-0.19) mcg/kg/min, p < 0.001) were recorded in patients with clonidine and dexmedetomidine. Bradycardia (HR < 60 bpm) developed in 7.8% with clonidine and 5.7% with dexmedetomidine (p=0.51). Between baseline and 12 hours, norepinephrine remained stable in the clonidine group (0.00 (-0.04-0.02) mcg/kg/min) and decreased in the dexmedetomidine group (-0.03 (-0.10-0.02) mcg/kg/min, p=0.007).

Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine and the low-cost drug clonidine can both be used safely in selected patients after cardiac surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Hemodynamic Management and Postoperative Outcomes After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Prospective Observational Study. Efficacy of COVID-19 Treatments in Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Assessment of Satisfaction Levels Among Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Serum Concentration at 24 h With Intensive Beta-Lactam Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study: Beta-Lactam Blood Levels in Sepsis. Assessing the Impact of Simulation-Based Learning on Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Critical Care Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1