梗阻性左侧结肠癌:是时候选择合适的手术方式了?

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Minerva chirurgica Pub Date : 2020-08-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-26 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08299-1
Carlo Bergamini, Alessio Giordano, Gherardo Maltinti, Giovanni Alemanno, Fabio Cianchi, Andrea Coratti, Roberto Manetti, Andrea Valeri, Paolo Prosperi
{"title":"梗阻性左侧结肠癌:是时候选择合适的手术方式了?","authors":"Carlo Bergamini,&nbsp;Alessio Giordano,&nbsp;Gherardo Maltinti,&nbsp;Giovanni Alemanno,&nbsp;Fabio Cianchi,&nbsp;Andrea Coratti,&nbsp;Roberto Manetti,&nbsp;Andrea Valeri,&nbsp;Paolo Prosperi","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08299-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) obstruction is frequent but doubts remain on the best treatment. The aim of this study is to analyze the different operative approach used for CRC treatment and evaluate the outcomes for the different cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were collected from January 2014 to December 2019 and divided in four groups: two \"P\" groups, namely the Hartmann's procedure (PH) group and the primary anastomosis (PA) group, and two \"S\" groups, namely the deviating stoma (SD) group and the self-expanding metallic stent (SS) group. The main endpoints were the quality of life and the oncologic safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eight patients were enrolled. The mean follow-up time was 39 months. The stomas were performed less frequently in SS but lasted more in that group. Only 45% underwent reversal surgery. Cumulative operating time was greater in S versus P groups. The rate of major complications was similar. PA had greater overall survival and disease-free survival rates than PH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The various options of treatment should have different indications: primary anastomosis in stable patients, Hartmann in critical cases, SEMS for palliative intent and stoma when neo-adjuvant therapy is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstructive left side colon cancer: time for a tailored operative approach?\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Bergamini,&nbsp;Alessio Giordano,&nbsp;Gherardo Maltinti,&nbsp;Giovanni Alemanno,&nbsp;Fabio Cianchi,&nbsp;Andrea Coratti,&nbsp;Roberto Manetti,&nbsp;Andrea Valeri,&nbsp;Paolo Prosperi\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08299-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) obstruction is frequent but doubts remain on the best treatment. The aim of this study is to analyze the different operative approach used for CRC treatment and evaluate the outcomes for the different cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were collected from January 2014 to December 2019 and divided in four groups: two \\\"P\\\" groups, namely the Hartmann's procedure (PH) group and the primary anastomosis (PA) group, and two \\\"S\\\" groups, namely the deviating stoma (SD) group and the self-expanding metallic stent (SS) group. The main endpoints were the quality of life and the oncologic safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eight patients were enrolled. The mean follow-up time was 39 months. The stomas were performed less frequently in SS but lasted more in that group. Only 45% underwent reversal surgery. Cumulative operating time was greater in S versus P groups. The rate of major complications was similar. PA had greater overall survival and disease-free survival rates than PH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The various options of treatment should have different indications: primary anastomosis in stable patients, Hartmann in critical cases, SEMS for palliative intent and stoma when neo-adjuvant therapy is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08299-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08299-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结直肠癌(CRC)梗阻是常见的,但对最佳治疗方法仍有疑问。本研究的目的是分析用于结直肠癌治疗的不同手术入路,并评估不同病例的结果。方法:选取2014年1月至2019年12月的患者,分为4组:2个“P”组,即哈特曼手术(PH)组和一期吻合(PA)组;2个“S”组,即偏口(SD)组和自膨胀金属支架(SS)组。主要终点为生活质量和肿瘤安全性。结果:108例患者入组。平均随访时间39个月。SS组造口次数较少,但持续时间较长。只有45%的患者接受了逆转手术。S组的累计手术时间大于P组。主要并发症发生率相似。结论:不同的治疗方案应具有不同的适应证:稳定患者采用初级吻合,危重病例采用Hartmann吻合,姑息目的采用SEMS吻合,需要新辅助治疗时采用造口吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Obstructive left side colon cancer: time for a tailored operative approach?

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) obstruction is frequent but doubts remain on the best treatment. The aim of this study is to analyze the different operative approach used for CRC treatment and evaluate the outcomes for the different cases.

Methods: Patients were collected from January 2014 to December 2019 and divided in four groups: two "P" groups, namely the Hartmann's procedure (PH) group and the primary anastomosis (PA) group, and two "S" groups, namely the deviating stoma (SD) group and the self-expanding metallic stent (SS) group. The main endpoints were the quality of life and the oncologic safety.

Results: One hundred and eight patients were enrolled. The mean follow-up time was 39 months. The stomas were performed less frequently in SS but lasted more in that group. Only 45% underwent reversal surgery. Cumulative operating time was greater in S versus P groups. The rate of major complications was similar. PA had greater overall survival and disease-free survival rates than PH.

Conclusions: The various options of treatment should have different indications: primary anastomosis in stable patients, Hartmann in critical cases, SEMS for palliative intent and stoma when neo-adjuvant therapy is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid. Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with end-stage alcohol-related liver disease and severe acute alcohol-related hepatitis: a concise review. Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results. Management of intra- and post-operative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures. A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1