COVID-19:对皮质类固醇保持冷静。

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE Pub Date : 2020-06-25 Epub Date: 2020-05-30 DOI:10.2302/kjm.2020-0007-LE
Seitaro Fujishima
{"title":"COVID-19:对皮质类固醇保持冷静。","authors":"Seitaro Fujishima","doi":"10.2302/kjm.2020-0007-LE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, intensive care units and general wards are packed with infected patients whose conditions are often complicated by sepsis, acute respiratory failure, or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Under the current circumstances, in which no established drugs are available, clinicians have been attempting to treat patients with a wide range of existing drugs, including low-to-high doses of corticosteroids, particularly for critically ill patients. Corticosteroid administration often lowers fever and decreases laboratory indices of inflammation; however, these short-term clinical improvements do not necessarily lead to improved long-term outcomes. Because corticosteroids produce a broad spectrum of anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects,1,2 we should be cautious before initiating corticosteroid treatment, especially at a high dose, without the coadministration of antimicrobials for such acute infections. Over the past two decades, corticosteroids have been used to a significant extent to treat patients during epidemics of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)coronavirus (CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV, and H1N1 influenza. In the initial phase of the SARS epidemic, even high-dose pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (≥500 mg/day) was suggested to be effective.3 However, the efficacy of corticosteroids remains unproven, and an increase in viral load was observed in SARS patients.4,5 With regard to acute respiratory failure or ARDS associated with H1N1 influenza, the efficacy of low-to-moderate dose corticosteroids in combination with oseltamivir was suggested in early reports,6,7 but later larger studies and systematic reviews showed either no efficacy or harmfulness for H1N1 infection and H1N1-associated ARDS.8–10 Corticosteroids were also administered to MERS-CoV patients, but its ineffectiveness and resultant delayed viral clearance were revealed in a recent large-scale multicenter study.11 There are conflicting results regarding COVID-19. A singlecenter retrospective study reported the possible efficacy of corticosteroids for COVID-19-associated ARDS by unadjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis.12 In contrast, another larger single-center cohort study suggested the harmfulness of high-dose corticosteroids by Cox proportional hazards analysis, although the definition of high dose was not clear.13 In a recently published systematic review of coronavirus infection, corticosteroid use was associated with higher mortality.14 COVID-19 infections are often associated with sepsis and ARDS, and the efficacy of corticosteroids for these critical conditions has been assessed by multiple randomized controlled trials. High-dose methylprednisolone treatments using either 30 mg/kg/6 h four times or an initial dose of 30 mg/kg followed by 5 mg/kg/h for 9 h were proven ineffective for both sepsis and ARDS.15–18 Although low-dose hydrocortisone is effective for the reversal of shock, its efficacy in improving long-term outcomes has not been established.19,20 Regarding ARDS, the administration of a moderate dose of methylprednisolone over a long period has been tried, but its effectiveness has not been established.21 The recently published positive results of dexamethasone treatment for ARDS patients require further assessment.22 Furthermore, it must be kept in mind that sepsis and ARDS are syndromes with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and that their pathophysiologies are heterogeneous. In fact, atypical features of COVID-19-induced ARDS have been noted.23 Thus, we cannot merely extrapolate the abovementioned results in sepsis and ARDS associated with other illnesses to similar conditions induced by COVID-19. In recently published studies, the blood levels of proinflammatory cytokines in patients with COVID-19, even in those with severe infections, were relatively low compared with those in patients with bacterial infections. These findings do not support the “cytokine storm” hypothesis, which is often cited as the basis for high-dose corticosteroid use.12,24 In summary, routine use or high doses of corticosteroids are not recommended for treating COVID-19 infection. So as not to reduce each patient’s chance of spontaneous recovery, the indication, timing, dosage, and treatment duration of corticosteroids should be assessed cautiously and on an individual basis while considering each patient’s clinical, inflammatory, and immunological conditions and whether putative antiviral drugs are being coadministered. High-dose corticosteroids, in particular, are not recommended. Preferably, steroids should be","PeriodicalId":46245,"journal":{"name":"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2302/kjm.2020-0007-LE","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19: Stay Cool toward Corticosteroids.\",\"authors\":\"Seitaro Fujishima\",\"doi\":\"10.2302/kjm.2020-0007-LE\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, intensive care units and general wards are packed with infected patients whose conditions are often complicated by sepsis, acute respiratory failure, or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Under the current circumstances, in which no established drugs are available, clinicians have been attempting to treat patients with a wide range of existing drugs, including low-to-high doses of corticosteroids, particularly for critically ill patients. Corticosteroid administration often lowers fever and decreases laboratory indices of inflammation; however, these short-term clinical improvements do not necessarily lead to improved long-term outcomes. Because corticosteroids produce a broad spectrum of anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects,1,2 we should be cautious before initiating corticosteroid treatment, especially at a high dose, without the coadministration of antimicrobials for such acute infections. Over the past two decades, corticosteroids have been used to a significant extent to treat patients during epidemics of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)coronavirus (CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV, and H1N1 influenza. In the initial phase of the SARS epidemic, even high-dose pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (≥500 mg/day) was suggested to be effective.3 However, the efficacy of corticosteroids remains unproven, and an increase in viral load was observed in SARS patients.4,5 With regard to acute respiratory failure or ARDS associated with H1N1 influenza, the efficacy of low-to-moderate dose corticosteroids in combination with oseltamivir was suggested in early reports,6,7 but later larger studies and systematic reviews showed either no efficacy or harmfulness for H1N1 infection and H1N1-associated ARDS.8–10 Corticosteroids were also administered to MERS-CoV patients, but its ineffectiveness and resultant delayed viral clearance were revealed in a recent large-scale multicenter study.11 There are conflicting results regarding COVID-19. A singlecenter retrospective study reported the possible efficacy of corticosteroids for COVID-19-associated ARDS by unadjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis.12 In contrast, another larger single-center cohort study suggested the harmfulness of high-dose corticosteroids by Cox proportional hazards analysis, although the definition of high dose was not clear.13 In a recently published systematic review of coronavirus infection, corticosteroid use was associated with higher mortality.14 COVID-19 infections are often associated with sepsis and ARDS, and the efficacy of corticosteroids for these critical conditions has been assessed by multiple randomized controlled trials. High-dose methylprednisolone treatments using either 30 mg/kg/6 h four times or an initial dose of 30 mg/kg followed by 5 mg/kg/h for 9 h were proven ineffective for both sepsis and ARDS.15–18 Although low-dose hydrocortisone is effective for the reversal of shock, its efficacy in improving long-term outcomes has not been established.19,20 Regarding ARDS, the administration of a moderate dose of methylprednisolone over a long period has been tried, but its effectiveness has not been established.21 The recently published positive results of dexamethasone treatment for ARDS patients require further assessment.22 Furthermore, it must be kept in mind that sepsis and ARDS are syndromes with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and that their pathophysiologies are heterogeneous. In fact, atypical features of COVID-19-induced ARDS have been noted.23 Thus, we cannot merely extrapolate the abovementioned results in sepsis and ARDS associated with other illnesses to similar conditions induced by COVID-19. In recently published studies, the blood levels of proinflammatory cytokines in patients with COVID-19, even in those with severe infections, were relatively low compared with those in patients with bacterial infections. These findings do not support the “cytokine storm” hypothesis, which is often cited as the basis for high-dose corticosteroid use.12,24 In summary, routine use or high doses of corticosteroids are not recommended for treating COVID-19 infection. So as not to reduce each patient’s chance of spontaneous recovery, the indication, timing, dosage, and treatment duration of corticosteroids should be assessed cautiously and on an individual basis while considering each patient’s clinical, inflammatory, and immunological conditions and whether putative antiviral drugs are being coadministered. High-dose corticosteroids, in particular, are not recommended. Preferably, steroids should be\",\"PeriodicalId\":46245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2302/kjm.2020-0007-LE\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.2020-0007-LE\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.2020-0007-LE","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19: Stay Cool toward Corticosteroids.
Due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, intensive care units and general wards are packed with infected patients whose conditions are often complicated by sepsis, acute respiratory failure, or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Under the current circumstances, in which no established drugs are available, clinicians have been attempting to treat patients with a wide range of existing drugs, including low-to-high doses of corticosteroids, particularly for critically ill patients. Corticosteroid administration often lowers fever and decreases laboratory indices of inflammation; however, these short-term clinical improvements do not necessarily lead to improved long-term outcomes. Because corticosteroids produce a broad spectrum of anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects,1,2 we should be cautious before initiating corticosteroid treatment, especially at a high dose, without the coadministration of antimicrobials for such acute infections. Over the past two decades, corticosteroids have been used to a significant extent to treat patients during epidemics of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)coronavirus (CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV, and H1N1 influenza. In the initial phase of the SARS epidemic, even high-dose pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (≥500 mg/day) was suggested to be effective.3 However, the efficacy of corticosteroids remains unproven, and an increase in viral load was observed in SARS patients.4,5 With regard to acute respiratory failure or ARDS associated with H1N1 influenza, the efficacy of low-to-moderate dose corticosteroids in combination with oseltamivir was suggested in early reports,6,7 but later larger studies and systematic reviews showed either no efficacy or harmfulness for H1N1 infection and H1N1-associated ARDS.8–10 Corticosteroids were also administered to MERS-CoV patients, but its ineffectiveness and resultant delayed viral clearance were revealed in a recent large-scale multicenter study.11 There are conflicting results regarding COVID-19. A singlecenter retrospective study reported the possible efficacy of corticosteroids for COVID-19-associated ARDS by unadjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis.12 In contrast, another larger single-center cohort study suggested the harmfulness of high-dose corticosteroids by Cox proportional hazards analysis, although the definition of high dose was not clear.13 In a recently published systematic review of coronavirus infection, corticosteroid use was associated with higher mortality.14 COVID-19 infections are often associated with sepsis and ARDS, and the efficacy of corticosteroids for these critical conditions has been assessed by multiple randomized controlled trials. High-dose methylprednisolone treatments using either 30 mg/kg/6 h four times or an initial dose of 30 mg/kg followed by 5 mg/kg/h for 9 h were proven ineffective for both sepsis and ARDS.15–18 Although low-dose hydrocortisone is effective for the reversal of shock, its efficacy in improving long-term outcomes has not been established.19,20 Regarding ARDS, the administration of a moderate dose of methylprednisolone over a long period has been tried, but its effectiveness has not been established.21 The recently published positive results of dexamethasone treatment for ARDS patients require further assessment.22 Furthermore, it must be kept in mind that sepsis and ARDS are syndromes with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and that their pathophysiologies are heterogeneous. In fact, atypical features of COVID-19-induced ARDS have been noted.23 Thus, we cannot merely extrapolate the abovementioned results in sepsis and ARDS associated with other illnesses to similar conditions induced by COVID-19. In recently published studies, the blood levels of proinflammatory cytokines in patients with COVID-19, even in those with severe infections, were relatively low compared with those in patients with bacterial infections. These findings do not support the “cytokine storm” hypothesis, which is often cited as the basis for high-dose corticosteroid use.12,24 In summary, routine use or high doses of corticosteroids are not recommended for treating COVID-19 infection. So as not to reduce each patient’s chance of spontaneous recovery, the indication, timing, dosage, and treatment duration of corticosteroids should be assessed cautiously and on an individual basis while considering each patient’s clinical, inflammatory, and immunological conditions and whether putative antiviral drugs are being coadministered. High-dose corticosteroids, in particular, are not recommended. Preferably, steroids should be
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Intravenous Regeneration-associated Cell Transplantation Enhances Tissue Recovery in Mice with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Warfarin Therapy and Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for a Patient with Atrial Fibrillation and Antithrombin-III Deficiency. Efficacy of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Cognition in Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Robotic Lobectomy with a Single Robotic Stapler from One 12-mm Port: A Multi-institutional Study. Incidence of Radiation-induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Prospective Single-institution Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1